Case law

United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Florida Steel Corporation, Intervenor. Florida Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor

646 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 1981

P 12,590 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Florida Steel Corporation, Intervenor. FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … Just as that is a vital consideration in determining the validity of a no-solicitation rule, see Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, at 797-798 ( 65 S.Ct. at 985 ); Labor Board v.

United States v. James Otis Brown, A/K/A Steven Brown

990 F.2d 1377 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1993

UNITED STATES of America v. James Otis BROWN, a/k/a Steven Brown, Appellant. No. 92-3018. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 30, 1993. … See United States v. Gibbs, 904 F.2d 52, 57 (D.C.Cir.1990); United States v. Zabalaga, 834 F.2d 1062, 1065 (D.C.Cir.1987).

Duru v. Dist. of Columbia

303 F. Supp. 3d 63 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 2018

Hairsine v. … Brown's infraction and chose not to discipline her. See Isse v. Am.

John Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2026

Fund v. Pub. Co. Acct. Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 485 (2010). The Board promulgates accounting standards, initiates investigations, conducts disciplinary adjudications, and issues sanctions. See id. … Doe v. Pub. Co. Acct. Oversight Bd., 2024 WL 3954189, at *2 (D.D.C. Aug. 2, 2024).

Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLC

569 F.3d 485 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2009

Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. … Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Capitol Hill Group (CHG) filed suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia against its former

Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 1057 v. National Labor Relations Board

567 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1977

NLRB v. … NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965); Lubrizol Corp. v. EPA, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 300 , 562 F.2d 807, 819 (1977).

Thomas, Oscar v. Principi, Anthony

394 F.3d 970 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 2005

In Price v . … Zuspann v. Brown, 60 F.3d 1156, 1161 (5th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Sugrue v. Derwinski, 26 F.3d 8, 12-13 (2d Cir. 1994).

Eddie M. Harrison v. United States of America, Orson G. White v. United States

387 F.2d 203 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 1, 1967

See Brown v. United States, supra note 28, 375 F.2d at 318 (concurring opinion). . Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338, 341 , 60 S.Ct. 266 , 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939). . See supra, note 1; Harrison v. … See also Inge v. United States, 123 U.S. App.D.C. 6, 356 F.2d 345 (1966); Johnson v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 69 , 344 F.2d 163 (1964); Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 338 F. 2d 543 (1964). .

Mawakana v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of the D.C.

315 F. Supp. 3d 189 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 2018

."); *200 Brown v. George Washington Univ. , 802 A.2d 382 , 385 (D.C. 2002), quoting Loebl v. New York Univ. , 255 A.D.2d 257 , 257, 680 N.Y.S.2d 495 (N.Y. App. … Brown v. Sessoms , 774 F.3d 1016 , 1021 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Section 1981 can encompass employment discrimination claims. Olatunji v. Dist. of Columbia , 958 F.Supp.2d 27 , 31 (D.D.C. 2013), citing Rivers v.

Russell, Lisa K. v. Principi, Anthony J.

257 F.3d 815 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2001

In Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999), the court rejected the argument that "poor perfor- mance evaluations are necessarily adverse actions." … The Department also urges us to rely on Rabinovitz v. Pena, 89 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1996), a case cited with approval in Brown.

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tiidee Products, Inc., Intervenor(two Cases). Tiidee Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (Two Cases)

502 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 29, 1974

Porter Co. v. … Hall v. Cole, supra, at 4-5 .

Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union

503 F.2d 177 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1974

. § 2000e, et seq., against the Hotel, Waitresses Local 507, the Joint Executive Board, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union (Joint Board), the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International … v.

Keenan (William) v. Benefits Review Board, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

831 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1987

831 F.2d 312 265 U.S.App.D.C. 311 Keenan (William) v. Benefits Review Board, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S.

American Forest Resource Council v. United States

77 F.4th 787 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2023

The ASQ has fluctuated over time, starting at 500 million board feet in 1937 and peaking at 1.2 billion board feet in 1972. See Murphy, 65 F.4th at 1127. … LLC v. Bernhardt, 417 F. Supp. 3d 22, 27–28 & n.4 (D.D.C. 2019). The minimum timber volume the BLM must sell annually, then, is 123 million board feet and the maximum is 287 million board feet.

Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. N. L. R. B

559 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

P 10,147 Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B. No. 76-1592 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/24/77 1 N.L.R.B.

Jones v. Bernanke

557 F.3d 670 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2009

Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008). The Supreme Court long ago held in United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. … Contrary to the Board’s second argument, Clark County School District v.

Teamsters Local Unions 745, 47, 886, 523, 270, 5, 568, 667 & 891 v. National Labor Relations Board

370 F.2d 226 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 14, 1966

V. Braswell, all herein referred to as Bras-well. The latter would have us set aside the order based on the Board’s decision that Braswell had violated Section 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. … Petitions for review are denied, and Order of the Board is enforced.

United Mine Workers of America v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Carbon Fuel Co., Intervenor

581 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1978

of the Board is properly the subject of this review. … Belford, 417 U.S. 642, 650 , 94 S.Ct. 2431, 2436 , 41 L.Ed.2d 374, 381 (1974), citing Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 194 , 15 L.Ed. 595, 599 (1857). 34 . See, e. g., First Nat’l Bank v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. National Van Lines, Inc.

613 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 1979

Brown-Pacifíc-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. Kemp, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 91-92 , 533 F.2d 1224, 1226-1227 (1976); Associated Indemnity Corp. v. … But see Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc., supra note 20, 587 F.2d at 628-629 . . The facts of Boughman are set out in the Board’s opinion, Ekar v.

Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

307 F.2d 197 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1962

Local 705 and its agents petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued February 20, 1961 ( 130 NLRB 558 ). The Board cross-petitions for enforcement. … The evidence supports the Board’s findings and the findings support the order. It is undisputed that picketing had continued more than 30 days.