Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.05s
646 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 1981
P 12,590 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Florida Steel Corporation, Intervenor. FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … Just as that is a vital consideration in determining the validity of a no-solicitation rule, see Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, at 797-798 ( 65 S.Ct. at 985 ); Labor Board v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedThomas, Oscar v. Principi, Anthony
394 F.3d 970 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 2005
In Price v . … Zuspann v. Brown, 60 F.3d 1156, 1161 (5th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Sugrue v. Derwinski, 26 F.3d 8, 12-13 (2d Cir. 1994).
Questioned by Broudy v. Mather, 366 F. Supp. 2d 3 (2005)Cited 553 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1998
NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir. 1963); see also NLRB v. Laredo Packing Co., 730 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir. 1984); Bagel Bakers Council, 555 F.2d at 305. … do Packing Co., 730 F.2d at 407; NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d at 454; NLRB v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 366 F.2d 809, 813 (5th Cir. 1966).
Cited 0 timesPublished880 F.2d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1989
See also NLRB v. … . v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedAmerican Forest Resource Council v. United States
77 F.4th 787 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2023
The ASQ has fluctuated over time, starting at 500 million board feet in 1937 and peaking at 1.2 billion board feet in 1972. See Murphy, 65 F.4th at 1127. … LLC v. Bernhardt, 417 F. Supp. 3d 22, 27–28 & n.4 (D.D.C. 2019). The minimum timber volume the BLM must sell annually, then, is 123 million board feet and the maximum is 287 million board feet.
Cited 11 timesPublished657 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1981
See Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658 , 83 S.Ct. 984 , 10 L.Ed.2d 50 (1963); United States v. SCRAP, 412 U.S. 669 , 93 S.Ct. 2405 , 37 L.Ed.2d 254 (1973); Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. … See, e. g., Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern R. Co., 372 U.S. 658, 671 , 672 n.24, 83 S.Ct. 984, 991 , 10 L.Ed.2d 50 (1963); United States v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCohen v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of the D.C.
311 F. Supp. 3d 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 2018
[is] governed by the Board of Trustees" with the power to sue or be sued); see also Hill v. … Com'rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404-05, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).
Cited 5 timesPublished518 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1975
Eng. v. NLRB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 294, 297 , 480 F.2d 1186, 1189 (1973) 14 What this court said in Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C. … NLRB v.
Cited 2 timesPublished567 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1977
NLRB v. … NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965); Lubrizol Corp. v. EPA, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 300 , 562 F.2d 807, 819 (1977).
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. District of Columbia
654 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1981
Brown v. Neeb, 25 Fair Empl. … In Brown v.
Cited 26 timesPublished221 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1955
It is not for us to insist that the Board should have followed some other course if, legally, it was authorized to do what it did. Brodie v. Young, 1943, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 169 , 133 F.2d 406 ; Gray v. … La Forest v. Board of Commissioners, 1937, 67 App.D.C. 396 , 92 F.2d 547 , certiorari denied, 1937, 302 U.S. 760 , 58 S.Ct. 367 , 82 L.Ed. 588 ; cf. generally, Nulter v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTheodore L. Lombard v. United States of America
690 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 14, 1982
United States v. Brown, supra, 348 U.S. at 113 , 75 S.Ct. at 145 . Thus, in Henry v. … See also Laswell v. Brown, supra, 683 F.2d at 269 .
Cited 68 timesPublished396 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1968
See e. g., National Packing Co. v. NLRB, 377 F.2d 800 (10th Cir. 1967); Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. … The Board relies *683 most heavily on this court’s decision in in Centralia Bldg. and Constr. Trades Council v.
Cited 24 timesPublished503 F.2d 177 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1974
. § 2000e, et seq., against the Hotel, Waitresses Local 507, the Joint Executive Board, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union (Joint Board), the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International … v.
Cited 140 timesPublishedA. Eugene Ramey v. Charles Bowsher, Comptroller of the United States
915 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1990
See Ramey v. GAO, 1 PAB R & D 102, 115-19 (Oct. 19, 1981), reproduced in part at Joint Appendix (“J.A.”) at 333. Accordingly, the Appeals Board awarded Ra-mey the requested within-grade salary increase. … See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (Title VII “provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment”). B.
Cited 24 timesPublished114 F.3d 206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1997
The Board’s approach is consistent with this scholarship and with the Commission’s precedents, see Coal Trading Corp. v. … V We turn finally to Burlington Northern’s claim that the Board dictated the railroad’s terms of service under the rate prescribed in the Board’s order.
Cited 20 timesPublished652 F.2d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1981
B. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., 396 U.S. 258, 263 , 90 S.Ct. 417, 420 , 24 L.Ed.2d 405 (1969). The Board-imposed remedy does not fit within this category. … An award of backpay is within the authority of the Board and in keeping with the policies of the Act. N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedTutt v. Federal Aviation Administration
173 F. App'x 843 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 2006
This appeal was considered on the record from the National Transportation Safety Board and on the briefs of the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. … The Board’s decision affirming Petitioner’s violations of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) is supported by substantial evidence. See Chritton v. NTSB, 888 F.2d 854 , 856 (D.C.Cir.1989).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. N. L. R. B
559 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977
P 10,147 Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B. No. 76-1592 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/24/77 1 N.L.R.B.
Cited 0 timesPublished244 F.2d 783 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1957
244 F.2d 783 100 U.S.App.D.C. 335 Rafael RIVERA, Appellant, v. James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of the Employees' Compensation Bureau, Appellees. No. 13680.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna