Case law

United States v. Thomas E. Fench, United States of America v. William H. Blackwell

470 F.2d 1234 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1973

Hardy v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 254 , 335 F.2d 288, 289 (1964). See Harper v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 239 F.2d 945 (1956); Bracey v. … See, e. g., Lewis v.

Building & Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. U.S. Department of Labor Wage Appeals Board Midway Excavators, Inc.

829 F.2d 1186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1987

Citing Securities & Exchange Comm’n v. … of the validity of an argument which the Board itself did not employ in reading its holding.”

Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

99 F.2d 117 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1938

Voorhees v. Noye Manufacturing Co., 1894, 151 U. S. 135 , 14 S.Ct. 295 , 38 L.Ed. 101 ; Vincent v. Vincent, 1884, 3 Mackey 320 , 14 D.C. 320 ; Brown v. Evans, 18 F. 56 , C.C.D.Nev., 1883.” … Co., 170 U.S. 675, 679 , 18 S.Ct. 786 , 42 L.Ed. 1192 ; Memphis v. Brown, 94 U.S. 715 , 24 L.Ed. 244 ; Brockett v. Brockett, 2 How. 238 , 11 L.Ed. 251 ; Payne v. Garth, 8 Cir., 285 F. 301 ; Klein v.

Zink v. Black Star Line, Inc.

18 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1927

It appears that the Shipping Board had incurred expenses to the amount of $875.34 in preparing the ship for delivery under the contract, and after the purchaser’s default the board offered to return the amounts, paid, less … . § 8146%aaa) authorizes the board to make such sales, and section 14 of the act (Comp.

Capital Traction Co. v. Morgan

44 App. D.C. 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1915

The defendant, having taken on more passengers than it could seat, a by no means uncommon occurrence, had no right to move those passengers about as pawns upon a chess board. … Stowe v. Heywood, 7 Allen, 118 ; Brown v. Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. 99 Mo. 319 , 12 S. W. 655 ; Western U. Teleg. Co. v. Adams, 75 Tex. 531 , 6 L.R.A. 844 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 920 , 12 S. W. 857 ; McCoy v.

Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission

931 F.2d 73 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1991

At about the time the Review Board acted, petitioners Hispanic Broadcasting Systems, Inc. … See, e.g., Dettmann v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 802 F.2d 1472 , 1476-77 & n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1986); Power Plant Division, Brown & Root, Inc. v. OSHRC, 673 F.2d 111 (5th Cir.1982); Brown v.

George E. v. Stone v. Board of Examiners and Registrars of Architects of the District of Columbia

249 F.2d 104 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1957

petition for allowance of an appeal from the judgment of the Municipal Court of Appeals entered herein October 23, 1956, of petitioner’s brief, of respondent’s brief, of petitioner’s reply, and of the decision and order of the Board … of Examiners and Registrars of Architects entered herein June 21, 1956, contained in the transcript of record; and it appearing that, although the Board’s sole conclusion was that petitioner “did violate Section 27(a) of

Hayde v. Boynton

26 F.2d 978 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1928

Brown (employees under Boynton in the Shipping Board), Croll, Boynton, and Larson. Subsequently Hayde was made a party. All of these parties, but Hayde and Boynton, have been eliminated. … The Assistant Commissioner affirmed the Board.

Elastic Stop Nut Division Of Harvard Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

921 F.2d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

NLRB v. Bausch and Lomb, Inc., 526 F.2d 817, 821 (2d Cir.1975). The question for the Board to consider is "whether the employer's actions are motivated by anti-union considerations." Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … United States v. L.A.

Berrigan v. Sigler

499 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1974

Zemel v. … See also United States v.

Borgess Medical Center v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell

843 F.3d 497 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 2016

Whitaker, Attorneys.  2 Before: TATEL, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by BROWN, Circuit Judge. … Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelius, 424 F.

Rhozier T. Brown, Jr. v. United States of America, John D. Irby v. United States of America, Robert L. Jones v. United States

375 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1967

In Wong Sun v. … Though the statement implicated Whitmire, the police had already learned of his implication through the statement of Brown. . Smith v. United States and Bowden v.

BellSouth Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

162 F.3d 678 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 1998

See United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). … (quoting United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 448 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965)).

Mortgage Bankers Association v. Seth Harris

720 F.3d 966 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2013

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: The tandem of Paralyzed Veterans of America v. D.C. Arena L.P., 117 F.3d 579 (D.C. Cir. 1997) and Alaska Professional Hunters Ass’n v. … Warshauer v. Solis, 577 F.3d 1330, 1338 (11th Cir. 2009); see also United States v.

Local 28, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Inc., Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Maritime Worrers, Local No. 3, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Inc., Afl-Cio, Ingram Barge Company v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1963

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ASSOCIATED MARITIME WORRERS, LOCAL NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, INC., AFL-CIO, Respondent. INGRAM BARGE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111, at 130 , 64 S.Ct. 851, at 860 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944).

Bufco Corp v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1998

NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir. 1963); see also NLRB v. Laredo Packing Co., 730 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir. 1984); Bagel Bakers Council, 555 F.2d at 305. … do Packing Co., 730 F.2d at 407; NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d at 454; NLRB v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 366 F.2d 809, 813 (5th Cir. 1966).

District of Columbia v. Lloyd

160 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1947

In Blair v. … See also Watkins v. Rives, 75 U. S.App.D.C. 109, 125 F.2d 33 . 8 Brown v. Renshaw, 1881, 57 Md. 67 .

United Food And Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local 150-A, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1989

See also NLRB v. … . v.

Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors

98 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 1996

Cohen v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of the D.C.

311 F. Supp. 3d 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 2018

[is] governed by the Board of Trustees" with the power to sue or be sued); see also Hill v. … Com'rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404-05, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).