Case law

David J. K. Granfield v. The Catholic University of America, a District of Columbia Corporation. Joseph A. Broderick v. The Catholic University of America, a District of Columbia Corporation

530 F.2d 1035 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1976

Board of Regents v. … Provident Tradesmens Bank and Trust Co. v. Paterson, 390 U.S. 102, 111 , 88 S.Ct. 733 , 19 L.Ed.2d 936 (1968); Brown v. Christman, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 126 F.2d 625 , 631--632 (1942); Boles v.

Darlene BUTLER, Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary, Department of the Army, Appellee

164 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 8, 1999

See Brown, v. General Servs. … “permits simultaneous adjudication of a mixed case appeal before the Board and a United States District Court.”); Connor v.

William H. Young v. Director, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Vito. J. Rossello v. United States Board of Parole

367 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1966

Phillips v. United States Board of Parole, supra, 122 U.S.App.D.C. at 240, 352 F.2d at 716. … In Phillips v.

Cornucopia Inst. v. Agric. Mktg. Serv.

285 F. Supp. 3d 217 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 2018

AMS oversees the Board. … Cotton v. Heyman , 63 F.3d 1115 , 1120 (D.C. Cir. 1995), quoting Fenster v. Brown , 617 F.2d 740 , 744 (D.C. Cir. 1979). As already discussed, the litigation spurred the agency to produce responsive records.

Dorsey v. Kingsland

173 F.2d 405 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1949

The so-called Board (spoken of in ap-pellee’s brief as sacrosanct) especially disclaimed any controlling influence from the decision of the Supreme Court in Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. … , and yet. so vague and indefinite as this.” 11 This court quoted with approval the statement of the court in People use of State Board of Health v.

Metropolitan Police Retiring Association, Inc. v. Walter N. Tobriner, Board of Commissioners for the District of Columbia

306 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1962

See, e. g., Helvering v. Le Gierse, 312 U.S. 531, 539-540 , 61 S.Ct. 646 , 85 L.Ed. 996 ; Jordan v. Group Health Ass’n, 71 App.D.C. 38, 43-44 , 107 F.2d 239, 244-245 ; Home Title Ins. Co. v. … Jordan v. Group Health Ass’n, supra.

California State Board of Optometry v. Federal Trade Commission, National Association of Optometrists and Opticians, Intervenor

910 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 28, 1990

BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge: The American Optometric Association, the California Optometric Association, and several States or state boards of optometry challenge a Federal Trade Commission rule that declares certain state laws … In Garcia v. San Antonio Metro.

Perez v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service

680 F.2d 779 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 1982

Id. § 1206; see generally Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 672 F.2d 150 (D.C.Cir.1982). … Fully persuaded that no provision allows the Board to entertain such appeals, we affirm its dismissals of them. It is so ordered. . Perez v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, No. 80-2472; Walters v.

American Freight System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Philip O. McArthur Southern Conference of Teamsters, Intervenors

722 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1983

According to the Board, if McArthur had a “good faith” belief that his truck was unsafe, his refusal to drive constituted protected concerted activity under the Board’s Interboro doctrine. See NLRB v. … See City Disposal Systems, Inc. v.

Local 57, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Garwin Corporation, S'agaro, Inc., Joseph Winkelman and Milton Mirsky, Intervenors. Garwin Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

374 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1967

It is the Board, not the courts, which is authorized to make these judgments. See NLRB v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., supra; Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, supra. … See Mount Hope Finishing Co., 106 N.L.R.B. 480 (1953), enforcement denied, 211 F.2d 365 (4th Cir. 1954); Brown Truck & Trailer Mfg.

Production Workers Union Of Chicago And Vicinity, Local 707, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

793 F.2d 323 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1986

In NLRB v. … See, e.g., NLRB v.

General Electric Company v. National Labor Relations Board, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America, Intervenor

117 F.3d 627 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1997

See Daily News v. NLRB, 979 F.2d 1571 , 1576 (D.C.Cir.1992) (where Board appeared to have “altered course” from prior precedent without explanation, court remanded to Board for further consideration). … Workers v. NLRB, 593 F.2d 1155 , 1164 (D.C.Cir.1978) (Board’s determination that no violation of Act occurred must be upheld “ ‘unless it has no rational basis’ ”) (quoting ILGWU v.

American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service

940 F.2d 704 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1991

See Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 834-35 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … The appellants might also have sought reinstatement before the Merit Systems Protection Board. See 39 U.S.C. § 1005 (c); 5 U.S.C. § 8151 ; 5 C.F.R. § 353 ; see also Roche v. USPS, 828 F.2d 1555, 1557 (Fed.Cir.1987).

L.R. Willson and Sons, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. L.R. Willson and Sons, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

698 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1983

Browne. … Willson & Sons v.

San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, (Two Cases). San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, McDonald System of California, Inc., Intervenor

501 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1974

P 10,127 SAN FRANCISCO LOCAL JOINT EXECUTIVE BOARD OF CULINARY WORKERS et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent (two cases). … NLRB v.

Armstrong v. Federal Aviation Administration

515 F.3d 1294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 2008

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … The emergency determination also prevented Armstrong from obtaining a stay of the order while he appealed it to the National Transportation Safety Board. Id. § 44709(e)(2).

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

676 F.2d 826 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1982

See NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 747-48 , 82 S.Ct. 1107, 1113-14 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962); NLRB v. … See Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 425 v. NLRB, supra, at 321, 323. Cf. Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. v.

Hatch, Donald J. v. DC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 1999

See Brown v. Plaut, 131 F.3d 163, 170 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (identifying "a number of unsettled questions about how to apply Sandin"). … Blankenship, 100 F.3d 640, 642 (8th Cir. 1996); Dominique v. Weld, 73 F.3d 1156, 1160 (1st Cir. 1996). We too faced this issue in Brown v.

Ernestine Hirshfeld, of the Estate of Sam H. Hirshfeld v. District of Columbia

254 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 1958

City of Owensboro, Ky.1955, 282 S.W.2d 628 ; Huntington v. City of Calais, 1909, 105 Me. 144 , 73 A. 829 ; Brown v. Town of Winthrop, 1931, 275 Mass. 43 , 175 N.E. 50 ; Braun v. … Wayne County, 1942, 303 Mich. 454 , 6 N.W.2d 744 ; Aronson v. City of St. Paul, 1934, 193 Minn. 34 , 257 N.W. 662 ; Board of County Com’rs of San Miguel County v. Pierce, 1892, 6 N.M. 324 , 28 P. 512 ; Lewis v.

Local Union No. 47, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations Board

927 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1991

NLRB v. United Techs. Corp., 884 F.2d 1569 , 1575 (2d Cir.1989); see Local 1395, IBEW v. … See Teamsters Local 175 v.