Case law

Crown Cork & Seal Company v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

36 F.3d 1130 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1994

Council v. … There is therefore no apparent basis *1143 for a remand to the Board. Chemical Manufacturers Ass’n v.

Equitable Paper Bag Co. v. Coe

70 F.2d 735 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 1934

In re Brown, 58 App. D. C. 285, 29 F.(2d) 873 ; Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co. (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 1006 . … Oval Wood Dish Co. v. Sandy Creek, N. Y., Wood Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 60 F. 285 . Counsel have cited Dunn Wire-Cut Lug Brick Co. v. Toronto Fire Clay Co. (C. C.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

381 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1967

In District 50, United Mine Workers v. … And in Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v.

Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis, D/B/A Suburban Yellow Taxi Company v. National Labor Relations Board

721 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 1983

In the past 10 years, the Board has been overruled in 12 independent contractor cases. Diamond Cabs, supra; Air Transit, Inc. v. NLRB, supra; NLRB v. Tri-State Transp. Corp., 649 F.2d 993 (4th Cir.1981); NLRB v. A. … The Board exceeds its authority when it refuses to apply the controlling law to cases that are not materially distinguishable. . NLRB v. HMO Int’l, 678 F.2d 806, 812 (9th Cir.1982); Ithaca College v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. National Labor Relations Board, the Udylite Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. The Udylite Corporation, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervenor

455 F.2d 1357 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1971

P 12,284 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. The UDYLITE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The UDYLITE CORPORATION, Respondent.

King Electric, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 8, Intervenor

440 F.3d 471 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 2006

The Board has never applied that doctrine, which sometimes justifies an employer’s petition for relief from a continuing obligation to bargain with an incumbent union, see Brooks v. … See Freund Baking Co., 165 F.3d at 931. rv Based on the foregoing, we grant King’s petition for review and deny the Board’s cross-application for enforcement. 1 . See, e.g., Cogburn Health Ctr., Inc. v.

Business Roundtable v. Securities & Exchange Commission

647 F.3d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2011

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. … Chamber of Commerce v. SEC, 412 F.3d 133, 143 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury

477 F.2d 1223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 1973

See Garcia v. Schwartz, 283 F.Supp. 157 (D.Colo.1968), and the cases cited therein. Cf. Goldwasser v. Brown, supra, 417 F.2d at 1174 . … Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 417 F.2d 1169 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970); Scott v.

Local 900, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

727 F.2d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 1984

reviewing court with the Board’s views, see NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

390 F. Supp. 3d 46 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2019

To that end, "the RLA establishes a mandatory arbitral mechanism for 'the prompt and orderly settlement' of two classes of disputes-'major disputes' and 'minor disputes.' " Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. … See Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. , 254 F.3d 654 , 661 (7th Cir. 2001). Because the plaintiff's race and gender discrimination claims involve both state and federal law, preemption and preclusion are both at issue here.

Perdue Farms, Inc., Cookin' Good Division, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

144 F.3d 830 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1998

Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). Our review of the Board’s factual conclusions is “highly deferential.” LCF, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

103 F.3d 151 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1997

(“NLRB” or “Board”). … NLRB v.

Metal Processors' Union Local No. 16, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Poray, Inc., Intervenor

337 F.2d 114 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1964

B. v. … N.L.R.B. v.

Michelle Thompson v. DC

967 F.3d 804 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2020

Thompson III, 832 F.3d at 342 n.2 (quoting Davis v. … Thompson, 2018 WL 4705787, at *8 (quoting Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).

Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Local 478 v. National Labor Relations Board

503 F.2d 192 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1974

We reaffirm that approach, see Southern Steamship Co. v. … See also Gulf States Utilities Co. v. FPC, 411 U.S. 747, 757-760 , 93 S.Ct. 1870 , 36 L.Ed.2d 635 (1973); McLean Trucking Co. v.

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States of America

615 F.2d 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 1980

Fisher v. Renegotiation Board, 355 F.Supp. 1171 (D.D.C.1973). The information in question meets the final requirement of exemption 4 in that it is privileged or confidential. … Brown et al., 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 , states “that Congress had not intended the FOIA exemptions be mandatory bars to disclosure.”

International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 474, Afl-Cio, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

814 F.2d 697 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1987

Chenery, as applied to the Board in our recent decision in Prill v. NLRB. … Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102, 118 , 100 S.Ct. 2051, 2061 , 64 L.Ed.2d 766 (1980); accord Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1722 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

Steve Milone, Lawrence T. Smith, a Member of the Board of Monitors v. John F. English

282 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1960

Smith is a Monitor who was appointed by the District Court on *833 nomination of plaintiffs as provided in the Consent Decree entered January 31, 1958, approved as modified in the parent action of English v.

George E. Evans v. Boyd Leedom, Individually and as Members of the National Labor Relations Board

265 F.2d 125 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1959

This suit, like Jones v. Summerfield, 1959, 105 U.S.App.D.C. -, 265 F.2d 124 , is based on the decision in Cole v. Young, 351 U.S. 536 , 76 S.Ct. 861 , 100 L.Ed. 1396 (1956). … Jones v. Summerfield, supra. He urges that he is protected by this court's decision in Duncan v. Summerfield, 102 U.S.App. D.C. 185, 251 F.2d 896 (1957). But the situation here is quite different from that in Duncan.

Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor For

104 F.3d 1354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1997

v. … Engineers v.