Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.86s
721 F.2d 1355 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1983
Kuhn v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 183 F.2d 839, 842 (D.C.Cir.1950). … V.
Cited 70 timesPublishedA. P. Desanno & Son, Inc. v. Mary Grace Brown, A. P. Desanno & Son, Inc. v. Donna Elaine Wooster
313 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1963
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn Cunningham v. John F. English
269 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1959
C., for Board of Monitors. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for Board of Monitors. Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit Judges. … Brown, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1945, 64 F.Supp. 168, 178 ; 3 Moore, Federal Practice, par. 23.24, at 3549 (2d ed. 1948); 2 Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 570, at 185 (Rules ed. 1950). 8 While the Rule must be given
Cited 12 timesPublishedBusiness Roundtable v. Securities & Exchange Commission
647 F.3d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2011
Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. … Chamber of Commerce v. SEC, 412 F.3d 133, 143 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Cited 30 timesPublished759 F.3d 91 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2014
See, e.g., Blassingame v. Sec’y of Navy, 811 F.2d 65, 71 (2d Cir. 1987) (claim challenging correction board decision accrues on date of decision); Dougherty v. BCNR, 784 F.2d 499, 501-02 (3d Cir. 1986) (same); Smith v. … Compare Martinez, 333 F.3d at 1303-04 (Tucker Act suit challenging service member’s discharge accrues on date discharge is finalized, notwithstanding subsequent correction board decision) with Chambers v.
Cited 57 timesPublishedRobert H. Davis v. Board of Parole of the Department of Justice of the United States
306 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1962
and be considered for parole, a position which the Board has declined to entertain. … The subject was recently discussed in the opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. Rickover, 369 U.S. 111 , 82 S.Ct. 580 , 7 L.Ed.2d 604 .
Cited 3 timesPublished486 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1973
B. v. … See, e.g., NLRB v. Southern Calif. Dist. Council of Laborers, 443 F.2d 220 (9 Cir. 1971) 13 Cf. NLRB v. Dover Tavern Owners' Ass'n, 412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969) 14 See, e. g., Douds v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIrving Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury
477 F.2d 1223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 1973
See Garcia v. Schwartz, 283 F.Supp. 157 (D.Colo.1968), and the cases cited therein. Cf. Goldwasser v. Brown, supra, 417 F.2d at 1174 . … Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 417 F.2d 1169 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970); Scott v.
Cited 81 timesPublished275 F.2d 646 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1960
We think the Board’s order is correct except that it goes too far in directing reimbursement of the dues and fees paid to the union by all casual employees. National Labor Relations Board v. … As so modified, the Board’s order will be enforced. It is so ordered. . We have considered the opinion of the Seventh Circuit in National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 28 timesPublished304 F. Supp. 3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2015
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Thomas Adamski is a former soldier in the United States Army who has spent decades trying to get the Army to modify his military records. … . at 24 (citing Mullen v.
Cited 10 timesPublished379 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1967
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … In Ferro v.
Cited 17 timesPublished449 F.2d 1046 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1971
See Brown, for and on Behalf of NLRB, v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 218 F.2d 542, 544 (9th Cir. 1954) (denial of § 10(j) injunction reversed) ; Lebus, for and on Behalf of NLRB v. … See also NLRB v. Heck’s, Inc., 390 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1968) (§ 10(e) relief denied because Board’s claim had already been decided adversely to it). .
Cited 4 timesPublished36 F.3d 1130 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1994
Council v. … There is therefore no apparent basis *1143 for a remand to the Board. Chemical Manufacturers Ass’n v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedUnited States v. Muhammad Abdul-Saboor
85 F.3d 664 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1996
Chimel v. … See United States v.
Cited 53 timesPublished500 F.2d 772 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1974
The Supreme Court has construed the corresponding NLRA provision broadly: in NLRB v. … Decision of Board, in App. at 37. . Id. at 39. This has been the position of the Board in another case which is presently before this court, Munsey v. Morton, No. 72-2095. .
Cited 43 timesPublished395 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1968
We begin by noting the deference a court gives to a Board finding of impasse. See Dallas General Drivers etc. v. … Drivers etc. v. NLRB, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 417, 420 , 355 F.2d 842 , 845 (1966); NLRB v.
Cited 56 timesPublished450 F.2d 1322 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 24, 1971
P 12,075 JOINT COUNCIL OF TEAMSTERS NO. 42 et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. ASSOCIATED INDEPENDENT OWNERS-OPERATORS, Petitioners, v. … II 13 Our review of the Board's determination must begin with the Supreme Court's opinion in N.L.R.B. v.
Disagreed with by United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 564 F.2d 271 (1977)Cited 17 timesPublished144 F.3d 830 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1998
Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). Our review of the Board’s factual conclusions is “highly deferential.” LCF, Inc. v. … Co. v.
Cited 41 timesPublished725 F.2d 1416 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1984
P 10,750 FUGAZY CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Tanaka Construction, Inc. v. NLRB, 675 F.2d 1029, 1035 (9th Cir.1982); NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublished414 F.2d 1194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1969
Store Union v. NLRB, 128 U.S.App.D.C. at 45, 385 F.2d at 305 11 NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 380 U.S. at 443, 85 S.Ct. at 1064 12 See Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. … NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 906 ; NLRB v. Frisch's Big Boy Ill-Mar, Inc., 356 F.2d 895 (7th Cir. 1966); NLRB v. Davis Cafeteria, supra, 358 F.2d 98 ; NLRB v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna