Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.08s
969 F.2d 1263 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1992
Printing Div. v. NLRB, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2215, 2223-24 , 115 L.Ed.2d 177 (1991), citing Local Union 1395, IBEW v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027 , 1030-31 (D.C.Cir.1986); see The Idaho Statesman v. … See e.g., Carey Canada, Inc. v.
Cited 27 timesPublished837 F.2d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1988
HARALSON and Ben Milam Savings & Loan Association, Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, et al. John B. HARALSON and Mercury Savings Association of Texas, Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, et al. … HARALSON, et al., Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, et al. John B. HARALSON, et al., Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, et al. Nos. 86-5363, 86-5364, 86-5671 and 86-5672.
Cited 1 timesPublishedInterstate Natural Gas Ass'n of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
494 F.3d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 2007
Before: ROGERS, GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 469 F.2d 130, 139 (D.C. Cir. 1972); Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FPC, 467 F.2d 361, 366 (D.C. Cir. 1972); accord Texaco, Inc. v. FPC, 412 F.2d 740, 745 (3d Cir. 1969).
Cited 9 timesPublished405 F.2d 1373 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 1968
405 F.2d 1373 132 U.S.App.D.C. 103 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … V 14 The union petitions for review of the Board's order on three points.
Cited 8 timesPublished440 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1970
That is the teaching of Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106 , 60 S.Ct. 444 , 84 L.Ed. 604 (1940), and Girouard v. … Blair v. Freeman, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 207 , 370 F.2d 229 (1966). Certainly our ruling would be applicable to any subsequent 10 (k) decision, for the Board would be on notice of the infirmity. See Zuber v.
Reversed on other grounds by National Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79, 404 U.S. 116 (1971)Cited 7 timesPublishedSan Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. N. L. R. B
509 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1975
(BNA) 2843 , 166 U.S.App.D.C. 204 San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, v. N. L. R. B. No. 73-2259 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 1/29/75 1 N.L.R.B. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublished663 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 31, 1980
P 12,478 AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 576, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Sam & Ed's, Inc., Clinton Foods, Inc., Intervenors. … Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. NLRB, 586 F.2d 1300, 1304 (9th Cir. 1978). See also NLRB v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTeamsters Local 20 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
610 F.2d 991 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 1979
We, like the Second Circuit, recognize that “the Board knows the facts of life in the labor world better than we ever can.” NLRB v. … We defer to the Board’s “expert knowledge of labor relations” and “ ‘its appraisal of normal conditions about industrial establishments.’ ” NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCharles Coles Diggs v. Civil Aeronautics Board, South African Airways, Intervenor
516 F.2d 1248 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1975
PER CURIAM: Petitioners, members of the House of Representatives and four associations who represent the interests of black Americans, appeal from an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB), which authorized South African … Petitioners place their principal reliance on American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 120 , 348 F.2d 349 (1965), and Pan American World Airways, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished281 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1960
We think the Board has properly construed the Act. … Capital, however, has never put forward an alternate proposal and, on the facts of this case, we think the remedy falls well within the Act and the Board’s discretionary authority. See Jacob Siegel Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished316 F.2d 371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1963
National Labor Relations Board, supra; and that other employees are available to handle the work, Los Angeles Mailers Union v. … United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 60 , 64, 294 F.2d 256, 260 (1961). Communications Workers of America v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedManchester-Tower Grove Community Organization/acorn v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System
607 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 1979
607 F.2d 494 197 U.S.App.D.C. 180 Manchester-Tower Grove Community Organization/Acorn v. … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System No. 78-1898 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 10/29/79 1 Fed. Res. Sys. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn F. English v. Board of Monitors and Kirkland Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz and Masters
282 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1960
Upon consideration whereof, it is Ordered by the court that payment by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters of the sum of $18,585.43, to the law firm of Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, employed by the Board … should subsequent consideration of this appeal result in disallowance by this court of any part of said amount the part so disallowed shall be credited upon the amount of fees due for approved legal services rendered to the Board
Cited 0 timesPublished188 F.2d 980 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1951
Barrett v. Commercial Credit Co., supra. This clearly provides that reacquired possession revivifies the remedy — an idle provision if the lien itself has not survived. … Brown v. Petersen, 1905, 25 App.D.C. 359, 363 . In this case Gordon repossessed the automobile without tumult, so his taking and retention were lawful unless some other person had a superior right to possession.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHelvering v. South Penn Oil Co.
68 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1933
Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 , 51 S. Ct. 140 , 75 L. Ed. 343 ; Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co., 282 U. S. 295 , 51 S. Ct. 137 , 75 L. Ed. 349 . … In Fleitmann v. Burnet, 62 App. D.
Cited 8 timesPublished424 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1970
Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603-604 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 166-167 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878). 12 This principle has been repeatedly applied. … In re Jenison, 267 Minn. 136, 137 , 125 N.W.2d 588, 589 (1963). 39 See also Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516 , 65 S.Ct. 315 , 89 L.Ed. 430 (1945); West Virginia State Board of Education v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMurphy v. Internal Revenue Service
493 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 3, 2007
Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. … See Brown v.
Cited 31 timesPublished47 App. D.C. 384 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1918
Mills v. Duryee, 7 Cranch, 481, 482 , 3 L. ed. 411, 412; Hilton v. Buyot, 159 U. S. 113, 182 , 40 L. ed. 95, 114, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 139. … “Alimony decreed to a wife in a divorce of separation from bed and board is as much a debt of record, until the decree has been recalled, as any other judgment for money is.” Barber v.
Cited 6 timesPublished285 F.2d 277 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 1960
As we held with respect to exemptions in Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App. D.C. 331, 185 F.2d 426 , so here, the procedure the Board followed met the requirement of the Act. … Peoples Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 78 , 209 F.2d 286 .
Cited 5 timesPublished494 F.2d 1136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1974
TAMM, Circuit Judge: In Associated Press v. NLRB, 160 U. S.App.D.C.-, 492 F.2d 662 (1974), we endorsed the Labor Board’s Spielberg doctrine. … See Local Union No. 2188, IBEW v. NLRB, 161 U.S. App.D.C. -, at-, 494 F.2d 1087 , at 1090 (1974). 6 . 198 NLRB No. 3 at 5.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna