Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.92s
414 F.2d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1969
Implement Wkrs. v. … Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished278 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1960
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd„ 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 493 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 . . National Labor Relations Board v. … International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1951, 341 U.S. 694, 701 , 71 S.Ct. 954 , 95 L.Ed. 1299 ; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedInternational Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
254 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 1958
The petition to set aside the Board’s order in No. 14,015 should be denied and the Board’s petition for enforcement in No. 14,093 should be granted in accordance with the opinion of the National Labor Relations Board, 118 … We do not necessarily adopt all of the reasoning of the Board, particularly that regarding the liability of the International Union. We do, however, agree with the results reached. Petition denied in No. 14,015.
Cited 1 timesPublished795 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1986
"wages"), with NLRB v. … Lewis, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished273 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1959
The Board seeks enforcement of the order. The material facts are not in dispute. … If they are raised, they should be dealt with in the first instance by the [Board].” Federal Broadcasting System v. Federal Commun. Comm’n, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 293 , 298, 231 F.2d 246, 251 .
Cited 1 timesPublished85 F.3d 646 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1996
When the Board is faced with a dispute “between two or more groups of employees over which is entitled to do certain work for an employer,” it is a dispute within the Board’s jurisdiction under section 10(k). NLRB v. … See, e.g., USCP-WESCO, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCaldwell v. Employees' Comp. Appeals Bd.
285 F. Supp. 3d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 2018
Caldwell filed an appeal of his disability compensation decision with the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board ("ECAB"). See Complaint at 8, 11. Apparently unhappy with ECAB's decision, Mr. … CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board's motion to dismiss Mr. Caldwell's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChauffeurs, Teamsters And Helpers, Local 633 Of New Hampshire v. National Labor Relations Board
509 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1974
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 73--1704. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 31, 1974. Decided Dec. 23, 1974. Angelo V. Arcadipane, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles P. … This Court refused to accept the Board's position based on its loss in NLRB v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. National Labor Relations Board
303 F. App'x 899 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2008
. *900 The Board adopted a reasonable interpretation of section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (c), which we defer to under the second step of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Thus, on remand from this court, the Board did exactly as we instructed, see Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 36, 48 (D.C.Cir.2005), and petitioner’s arguments to the contrary are meritless.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGwynne A. Wilcox v. Donald J. Trump
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 2025
But to enforce its orders, the Board must petition a federal court of appeals. Id. § 160(e); see also Dish Network Corp. v. … See Order, Trump v. Cook, No. 25A312 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2025) (member of the Federal Reserve Board); Order, Blanche v. Perlmutter, No. 25A478 (U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFast Food Workers Committee v. NLRB
31 F.4th 807 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 2022
And it is the Board, not an ALJ, that sets labor policy in accordance with the National Labor Relations Act. See Beth Israel Hosp. v. … relations policy and its effect on the economy” and the imposition of “unprecedented new joint bargaining obligations” on entities deemed joint employers) (overruling BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris
Cited 1 timesPublished150 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1945
Seeley, 30 App.D.C. 191, 193 , 12 Ann.Cas. 1058; In re Adoption of a Minor, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 191 , 144 F.2d 644, 652 ; see Brown v. Brown, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 73, 75 , 134 F.2d 505, 507 . 6 Seeley v. … In re Adoption of a Minor, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 191 , 144 F.2d 644 ; Overholser v. Treibly, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 147 F.2d 705 . 12 Brown v.
Cited 48 timesPublishedFederal Home Loan Bank Board v. John W. Rowe, John B. Hoadley v. John W. Rowe
284 F.2d 274 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1960
to Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Agnew, 1947, 329 U.S. 441, 444 , 67 S.Ct. 411 , 91 L.Ed. 408 ; and see Kansas City Power & Light Company v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedLocal 155 of the International Molders & Allied Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board
442 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1971
NLRB v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc., supra, at 34 , 87 S.Ct. at 1798 . The question for the Board was whether the Company’s conduct was inherently prejudicial to Union interests, or as stated in NLRB v. Brown, 380 U. … The Board’s position we think is not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s warning that the Board may not make labor policy beyond the scope of the Act, see American Ship Bldg. Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished131 F.3d 1026 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 1997
Indeed, the Board’s opinion expresses the tentative view that under NLRB v. … See Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 518 U.S. 231 , 116 S.Ct. 2116 , 135 L.Ed.2d 521 (1996); Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for N. Cal. v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMcKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
672 F.3d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 2012
Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, TATEL and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 539 F.3d 485, 489 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (“McKesson V”).
Cited 32 timesPublishedThe City of Houston, Texas and the Houston Chamber of Commerce v. Civil Aeronautics Board
317 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1963
The Board's reliance on Eastern Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Bd. 12 is misplaced. … In Braniff Airways, Inc. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished465 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 1972
McCulloch v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 131 U.S. App.D.C. 190, 191, 403 F.2d 916 (1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1016 , 89 S.Ct. 618 , 21 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969); Boire v. … NAW-CAS-GUILD assert, however, that the Board deprived them of procedural due process and rely upon Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2 Cir. 1949). As this court said in McCulloch v.
Cited 6 timesPublished203 F.3d 41 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2000
under Communications Workers of America v. … Because it did not, we think the Board’s decision reflects a classic case of lack of reasoned decisionmaking. See Macmillan Publishing Co. v.
Cited 19 timesPublished785 F.3d 671 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 2015
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS. BROWN, Circuit Judge. … SunRise was governed by a Board of Directors, which, at various times, consisted of SunRise’s principal, teachers, employees, and Emor’s family members. Emor was the one constant on SunRise’s Board.
Cited 50 timesPublished
Ask Donna