Case law

Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

68 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1995

We are obliged to defer heavily to Board remedial decisions. See, e.g., NLRB v. … Products Corp. v.

Faic Securities, Inc. v. United States

768 F.2d 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 1985

Brief for Appellant Bank Board at 52. … In Craig v.

12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Bd.

316 F. Supp. 3d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 2018

See, e.g., Ellipso, Inc. v. … Pension Fund v. ZAK Architectural Metal & Glass LLC , 736 F.Supp.2d 35 , 38 (D.D.C. 2010) (citing Armstrong v. Exec. Office of the President , 1 F.3d 1274 , 1289 (D.C. Cir.1993) ).

National Ass'n of Casualty & Surety Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

856 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 9, 1988

Agents v. Board of Governors, 835 F.2d 1452 (D.C.Cir.1987). … See FEC v.

Sprain Brook Manor Nursing Home, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

255 F. App'x 529 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2007

The Board and ALJ explained their findings, which substantial evidence supports. Credibility determinations adopted by the Board receive particular deference. Cadbury Beverages, Inc. v. … Moreover, we give the Board “an especially ‘wide degree of discretion’ ” on questions of representation. Canadian Am. Oil Co. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 469, 473 (D.C.Cir.1996) (quoting NLRB v. A.J.

Local No. 441, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

510 F.2d 1274 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1975

See Greater Boston Television Corp. v. … .”); Retail Store Employees Union, Local 400 v. NLRB, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 362 , 360 F.2d 494 , 496 (1965) (“[T]he place accorded to findings of a trial examiner in Universal Camera Corp. v.

Retail Clerks Union 1059, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

348 F.2d 369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1965

of America v. … National Labor Relations Board, 339 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1964), to support the Board’s claim of right to impute illegal conduct to petitioner, without affording it a chance to rebut that imputation. Cf. Bland v.

12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Bd.

289 F. Supp. 3d 73 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 2018

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. , 555 U.S. 7 , 20, 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) ; accord Cuomo v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n , 772 F.2d 972 , 974 (D.C. … United Life, Inc. v. Burwell , 128 F.Supp.3d 321 , 330 (D.D.C. 2015). Additionally, "[t]he public interest is, no doubt, served by a transparent government." Judicial Watch, Inc. v.

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division v. Surface Transportation Board

200 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2006

See Rainbow/PUSH Coalition v. FCC, 330 F.3d 539, 542 (D.C.Cir.2003) (discussing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992)). … Before the Board, the Union relied upon a series of cases rejecting efforts to seek Board approval for transactions not undertaken for bona fide purposes under § 11323(a) and related statutes. See, e.g., Marin County v.

Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

569 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2009

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … Co. v. STB, 403 F.3d 771, 776-77 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Production Workers Union of Chicago & Vicinity, Local 707 v. National Labor Relations Board

793 F.2d 323 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1986

In NLRB v. … See, e.g., NLRB v.

Amer Pstl Wrkr Un v. NLRB

370 F.3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

They were: Hardy, an MCOA driver; Brown, the president of APWU Local 32; and Grimes, an APWU organizer. … Discrimination The Union argues the Board’s decision is inconsistent with NLRB v.

Wine & Liquor Salesmen & Allied Workers Local Union 195 v. National Labor Relations Board

452 F.2d 1312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1971

NLRB v. Elliott-Williams Company, 345 F.2d 460, 463 (7th Cir. 1965) ; Warner Company v. NLRB, 365 F.2d 435, 437 (3rd Cir. 1966); NLRB v. … Local Lodge No. 1424, I.A.M. v. NLRB, 362 U.S. 411 , 80 S.Ct. 822 , 4 L.Ed.2d 832 (1960). NLRB v.

Sydney O. Hall v. Claude A. Ford

856 F.2d 255 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1988

(quoting Ecker v. Cohalan, 542 F.Supp. 896, 901 (E.D.N.Y.1982), and Elrod, 427 U.S. at 368 , 96 S.Ct. at 2687 ). See also Brown, 787 F.2d at 169-70 . b. … Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v.

Retail Clerks Union, Local 1401, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

463 F.2d 316 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1972

Casting Co. v. … See Riverside Press, Inc. v.

Snowden v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

253 F.3d 725 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2001

See Brown v. I.T.T./Conti- nental Baking Co., 921 F.2d 289, 293 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing Stark v. Washington Star Co., 833 F.2d 1025, 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Stevenson v. Linens of the Week, 688 F.2d 93, 96-97 (D.C. … See, e.g., Stoddard v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 868 F.2d 1308, 1312 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Synovus Fin. Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 952 F.2d 426, 428 (D.C.

Local 28, International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1963

The Board’s “experience in the administration of the statute gives it familiarity with the circumstances and backgrounds of employment relationships in various industries * * National Labor Relations Board v. … See Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 485, 490 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947). For these reasons, in No. 17,193, the Board’s order will be affirmed.

Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. National Labor Relations Board

303 F. App'x 899 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2008

. *900 The Board adopted a reasonable interpretation of section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (c), which we defer to under the second step of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Thus, on remand from this court, the Board did exactly as we instructed, see Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 36, 48 (D.C.Cir.2005), and petitioner’s arguments to the contrary are meritless.

Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal Service

794 F.3d 21 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2015

Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Maritime Subsidy Board, 901 F.2d 1119, 1123 (D.C. Cir. 1990); see also National Rifle Association of America, Inc. v.

Soft Drink Workers Union Local 812 v. National Labor Relations Board

937 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1991

Penello v. … Building Service Employees Int'l Union, Local 262 v.