Case law

Whitney v. Hay

15 App. D.C. 164 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1899

See, also, Warren v. Warren, 105 Ill. 568, 574 ; Brown v. Sutton, 129 U. … Take the case of Brown v.

Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381, Affiliated With the Retail Clerks International Associations, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association

348 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1965

INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Brown et al., 85 S.Ct. 980 , the order of the Board insofar as applicable to No. 17790 is modified by deleting therefrom in paragraph 1(a) the requirement that the employers involved cease and desist from 'engaging in a lock-out

United States Overseas Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

222 F.2d 303 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1955

In Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, No. 11118, and in Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. … Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1952, 344 U.S. 825 , 73 S.Ct. 25 , 97 L.Ed. 642 ; Chicago. & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v.

Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board

302 F.2d 897 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 1962

302 F.2d 897 HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS, LOCAL 107, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 16429. … Local 1424, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B.

Frederick B. Pfister v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

675 F.2d 1314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1982

Walton Manufacturing Co., 369 U.S. 404, 408 , 82 S.Ct. 853, 855 , 7 L.Ed.2d 829 (1962); O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508-509 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). … Pfister v. Benefits Review Board, No. 80-1081 (D.C.Cir. March 11, 1982) (order denying motion for disqualification).

Granfield v. Catholic University of America

530 F.2d 1035 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1976

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 566, n. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2703 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). . … Provident Tradesmens Bank and Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102, 111 , 88 S.Ct. 733 , 19 L.Ed.2d 936 (1968); Brown v. Christman, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 126 F.2d 625, 631-632 (1942); Boles v.

Local Union No. 519, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices v. National Labor Relations Board

416 F.2d 1120 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1969

Ill, 1965-67); Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. NLRB, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 371 F.2d 740 (1966) ; International Union UAW v. NLRB, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 196 , 392 F.2d 801 (1967); Braniff Airways, Inc. v. … Meadowmoor Dairies, 312 U.S. 287 , 61 S.Ct. 552 , 85 L.Ed 836 (1941); NLRB v. Local 3, IBEW, 317 F.2d 193 (2d Cir. 1963); Dunn v.

Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers v. National Labor Relations Board

518 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1975

Local 1912, International Association of Machinists v. … Eng. v. NLRB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 294, 297 , 480 F.2d 1186, 1189 (1973). . What this court said in Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board

363 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 10, 1966

363 F.2d 272 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., DISSTON DIVISION-DANVILLE WORKS, Petitioner, v. … Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 398 , 66 S.Ct. 203, 216 , 90 L.Ed. 145 (1945)

Building Material & Construction Teamsters Union Local No. 216 v. National Labor Relations Board

520 F.2d 172 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1975

See Enterprise Ass’n, Local 638 v. N.L. R.B., No. 73-1764, 172 U.S.App.D.C. -, 521 F.2d 885 , decided July 1, 1975; Meat & Highway Drivers, Local 710 v. … As the Supreme Court said in N.L.R.B. v.

Air Line Pilots Association International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc. Air Line Dispatchers' Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc.

502 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1974

P 10,315 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, American Airlines, Inc., et al. AIR LINE DISPATCHERS' ASSOCIATION et al., Petitioners, v. … National Aviation Trades Ass'n v.

Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of Transportation

821 F.3d 19 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 2016

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge and WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judges. … Opinion of the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN: BROWN, Circuit Judge: With the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, Congress created Amtrak, a for-profit corporation indirectly controlled by the President of the United

Elastic Stop Nut Division of Harvard Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

921 F.2d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

NLRB v. Bausch and Lomb, Inc., 526 F.2d 817, 821 (2d Cir.1975). The question for the Board to consider is “whether the employer’s actions are motivated by anti-union considerations.” Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … As we have previously noted, “the critical inquiry is whether the objections made before the Board were adequate to put the Board on notice that the issue might be pursued on appeal.” Consolidated Freightways v.

Robert B. Thompson, Jr. v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia

299 F.2d 920 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1962

By an order of September 1, 1944, the Board of Education raised the Phelps institution to the level of a senior high school,, and shortly thereafter the Board “transferred” Thompson from the Phelps Vocational School to the … The Board and the Superintendent moved to dismiss the complaint as failing to state a claim upon which relief could he granted. The District Court granted the motion on that ground. Thompson appeals.

Retail Clerks Local 588, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

565 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1977

See, e. g., Smith Steel Workers v. A. O. … Boire v.

Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board, Honolulu Typographical Union No. 37, Intervenor

274 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1959

In the second place, a similar argument was made to this court in Milwaukee County and Vicinity of the Carpenters District Council, etc. v. N. L. R. B. 3 and was rejected. … We find no merit in the Board’s contention that Section 24(c) of this contract is merely a savings clause of the type found ineffectual in Red Star Express Lines of Auburn v.

Pruitthealth-Virginia Park, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

888 F.3d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2018

See NLRB v. Furnas Elec. … Univ. v. NLRB, 807 F.3d 308, 313 (D.C.

Pa. State Corr. Officers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

894 F.3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 2018

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB , 340 U.S. 474 , 488, 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). We will affirm the legal conclusions of the Board so long as they are not arbitrary and capricious. See Mail Contractors of Am. v. … The Board argues, following Alden Leeds, Inc. v. NLRB , 812 F.3d 159 , 167-68 (D.C.

International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union v. National Labor Relations Board, Sea-Land Service, Inc., Intervenor

884 F.2d 1407 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 5, 1989

Contractors Inc. v. … Section 10(k) requires that the Board resolve all jurisdictional disputes in favor of one or the other parties. See NLRB v.

Miller v. Mayor of Washington

2 Hay. & Haz. 241 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1857

the Board of Aldermen for said office, to which nomination the Board refused to consent, by which I understand, and it is admitted in the argument of the case agreed, he was rejected by the Board of Aldermen; that from time … An officer rejected by the Board of Aldermen on the Mayor’s nomination cannot, I think, be re-appointed by the Mayor in the recess of the same Board.