Case law

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

237 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1956

In Swift’s petition for rehearing we are again urged to hold that the Board erred in refusing to pass upon the legality of the appeals made at the Union’s meetings, or to remand to the Board to require it to decide this issue … Under the circumstances here presented we do not think the statute made such a decision mandatory upon the Board, or that we are required to remand the case for such a decision by the Board.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen, Local Union 576 v. National Labor Relations Board

516 F.2d 1244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 1, 1975

Gissel *319 Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969), and this court’s decision in Local 195, Wine & Liquor Salesmen v. NLRB, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 452 F.2d 1312 (1971). … In Local 347, Meat Cutters v.

Adirondack Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

740 F.3d 692 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 2014

Raab, Attorney.  2 Before: ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge. … (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000))). With that in mind, we turn to the Hospitals’ argument.

Laborers' Local Union No. 204, Laborers' International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 715 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1990

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. … See Giant Food Markets, Inc. v.

Faic Securities, Inc. v. United States

768 F.2d 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 1985

Brief for Appellant Bank Board at 52. … In Craig v.

Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade Commission

543 F.2d 903 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1976

See also NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965); United States v. Carlo Bianchi Co., 373 U.S. 709, 715-718 , 83 S.Ct. 1409, 1413-1415 , 10 L.Ed.2d 652, 657-660 (1963); SEC v. … State Bar of California, 71 Cal.2d 535 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 696 , 455 P.2d 800, 810 (1969); Bar Assoc. of Baltimore City v. Marshall, 269 Md. 510 , 307 A.2d 677, 681 (1973); State Board v.

Carpenters, Local Union 2471 v. National Labor Relations Board

481 F.3d 804 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

Thus, where the record evidence is in conflict, the substantial evidence test requires the Board “to take account of contradictory evidence,” Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983)). Our review of the Board’s refusal to pierce A.J.

Pruitthealth-Virginia Park, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

888 F.3d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2018

See NLRB v. Furnas Elec. … Univ. v. NLRB, 807 F.3d 308, 313 (D.C.

Central Bank v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System of U. S

593 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1979

593 F.2d 1370 193 U.S.App.D.C. 216 Central Bank v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System of U. S. No. 77-1937 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/2/79 1 Fed. Res. Sys. AFFIRMED

Central Bank v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System of U. S

589 F.2d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 1978

589 F.2d 1115 191 U.S.App.D.C. 212 Central Bank v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System of U. S. No. 77-1937 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 11/21/78 1 Fed. Res. Sys. 2 REMANDED *

Miller v. Mayor of Washington

2 Hay. & Haz. 241 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1857

the Board of Aldermen for said office, to which nomination the Board refused to consent, by which I understand, and it is admitted in the argument of the case agreed, he was rejected by the Board of Aldermen; that from time … An officer rejected by the Board of Aldermen on the Mayor’s nomination cannot, I think, be re-appointed by the Mayor in the recess of the same Board.

Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. Bank

105 F.2d 796 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1939

Its board of directors consisted of about twenty members, and its executive com-' mittee of about eight members. … Brown v. Slocum, 30 App.D.C. 576 .

General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 886 v. National Labor Relations Board

247 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1957

Rabouin v. National Labor Relations Board,' 2 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 906, 912 . … See also Meier & Pohlmann Furniture Co. v. Gibbons, 8 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 296 ; Id., .D.C.1953, 113 F.Supp. 409 ; Madden v. Local 442, D.C.W.D.Wis.1953, 114 F.Supp. 932 .

Ollie M. Darby and William Gonzales v. Internal Revenue Service and Merit Systems Protection Board

672 F.2d 192 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 1982

In Drew v. … DA043009003 (Feb. 11, 1981); Wells v.

Robert C. Fielding v. John Henry Brebbia

399 F.2d 1003 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 1968

For example, in Goodrum v. … Brown v. Coates, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 302, 304, 253 F.2d 36, 38, 40 , 67 A.L.R.2d 943 (1958). 5 . See, e.g., McFail v. Braden, 19 Ill.2d 108 , 166 N.E.2d 46, 51, 52 (1960); Kukla v.

Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board, Honolulu Typographical Union No. 37, Intervenor

274 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1959

In the second place, a similar argument was made to this court in Milwaukee County and Vicinity of the Carpenters District Council, etc. v. N. L. R. B. 3 and was rejected. … We find no merit in the Board’s contention that Section 24(c) of this contract is merely a savings clause of the type found ineffectual in Red Star Express Lines of Auburn v.

Local Union 1395, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

797 F.2d 1027 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1986

In reviewing the Board’s orders, courts customarily defer to the Board’s exercise of its “special function of applying the general provisions of the Act to the complexities of industrial life.” NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Bernhard-Altmann Texas Corporation

280 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1960

280 F.2d 616 INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. BERNHARD-ALTMANN TEXAS CORPORATION, Respondent. … B. v.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Britton

188 F.2d 674 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 5, 1951

O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 1951, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 ; Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 330 U.S. 469, 477 , 67 S.Ct. 801 , 91 L.Ed. 1028 ; Norton v. … It is their contention that the payments of Ivor were not dependency contributions but were payments for rent and board.

Vestal v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

152 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1945

Petitioner next contends that the decision of the then Board of Tax Appeals in Chilhowee Mills v. Commissioner, supra, is res judicata of the issues here involved. … We think that the doctrine of United States v. Brown, 6 Cir., 1936, 86 F.2d 798 , is sound and should apply in this case. In that case a corporation was dissolved and its assets distributed.