Case law

David Noble, Jr. v. National Association of Letter Carriers

103 F.4th 45 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 2024

Brown, 498 U.S. 466 (1991). … Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 498 U.S. 466, 467 (1991). A union may deny a candidate’s distribution request if it is not reasonable.

National Automobile Dealers Association, Inc. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

571 F.2d 674 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1978

571 F.2d 674 187 U.S.App.D.C. 240 National Automobile Dealers Association, Inc. v. … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System No. 76-2021 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/21/78 Bd. of Governors AFFIRMED

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

394 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1968

The Board made similar findings. … The Board also found that the economic strike which began in November, 1964, was never converted into an unfair labor practice strike, because the Company engaged in no conduct violative of the Act. . NLRB v.

Dallas Mailers Union, Local No. 143 and International Mailers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

445 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1971

We therefore enforce the order of the National Labor Relations Board insofar as it adopts sections 1(e) and 2(a), (b), (c) and (e) of the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner. 4 (J.A. 47-48.) … By confusing excuse for reason Weimar Cantrell eventually made his case the topic of letters and the concern of a trial examiner and later the National Labor Relations Board.

Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade Commission

543 F.2d 903 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1976

See also NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965); United States v. Carlo Bianchi Co., 373 U.S. 709, 715-718 , 83 S.Ct. 1409, 1413-1415 , 10 L.Ed.2d 652, 657-660 (1963); SEC v. … State Bar of California, 71 Cal.2d 535 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 696 , 455 P.2d 800, 810 (1969); Bar Assoc. of Baltimore City v. Marshall, 269 Md. 510 , 307 A.2d 677, 681 (1973); State Board v.

Directsat U.S. LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

925 F.3d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 2019

We review the Board’s determination of a constitutional issue de novo. See J.J. Cassone Bakery, Inc. v. NLRB, 554 F.3d 1041, 1044 (D.C. Cir. 2009). … KLB Indus. v. NLRB, 700 F.3d 551, 556 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (citation omitted).

United Packinghouse, Food and Allied Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Farmers' Cooperative Compress, Intervenor. Farmers' Cooperative Compress v. National Labor Relations Board, United Packinghouse, Food and Allied Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

416 F.2d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 10, 1969

In its historic decision in Brown v. … This circumstance does not gainsay the Supreme Court's finding in Brown v.

Chicago Local No. 458-3M, Graphic Communications International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

206 F.3d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 2000

In order for the court properly to review the Board's decision, it "must be able to discern the rationale" underlying the Board's conclusions. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Int'l Union v. NLRB, 46 F.3d 82, 90 (D.C. … In order to make NLRB v.

Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of Transportation

821 F.3d 19 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 2016

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge and WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judges. … Opinion of the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN: BROWN, Circuit Judge: With the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, Congress created Amtrak, a for-profit corporation indirectly controlled by the President of the United

Robert J. Jones v. Civil Aeronautics Board and Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency

332 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1964

The Board’s order was based on findings made after hearings and procedures in which we find no error. … But we must recognize the special competence and responsibility of the Board in administering the safety regulations referred to and we find no basis for judicial repudiation of the conclusion reached on the basis of Board

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

435 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1970

This obviously does not warrant undercutting the Board’s findings and conclusions. … The Company was entitled to fair notice of the issues, and of the need for pertinent evidence to be developed for consideration by the Board. The Board’s petition for enforcement is granted.

Ralph J. Alvey v. United Air Lines, Inc

494 F.2d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1974

Alvey had as carry-on baggage a pasteboard folder and a small package wrapped in brown paper. He stood in line waiting to be searched. … She “stated a man that had boarded the plane was acting irrationally, and he had upset a few of the other passengers on the plane.”

Acme Die Casting, a Division of Lovejoy Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

93 F.3d 854 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1996

Daily News of Los Angeles v. NLRB, 73 F.3d 406 , 412 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1996). … We noted that any reasonable rule adopted by the Board would, under the familiar principles of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

International Union of Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

343 F.2d 327 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 1965

The Union petitions for writ of mandamus to require the National Labor Relations Board to file with this court the record of proceedings before the Board which eventuated in an order on December 16, 1964. … Upon the basis of all data supplied to the Board on the issue we accept the factual finding of the Board that neither Union nor employer can be said to bave filed before the other.

Albra v. Bd. of Trs. of Miami Dade Coll.

296 F. Supp. 3d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 2018

The plaintiff has *183 sued MDC's Board of Trustees and the United States Department of Education ("DOE") under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. § 706 . 1 Pending are MDC's Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to … See Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Moreover, in evaluating subject matter jurisdiction, the court "may consider materials outside the pleadings." Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

237 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1956

In Swift’s petition for rehearing we are again urged to hold that the Board erred in refusing to pass upon the legality of the appeals made at the Union’s meetings, or to remand to the Board to require it to decide this issue … Under the circumstances here presented we do not think the statute made such a decision mandatory upon the Board, or that we are required to remand the case for such a decision by the Board.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board

363 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 10, 1966

363 F.2d 272 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., DISSTON DIVISION-DANVILLE WORKS, Petitioner, v. … Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 398 , 66 S.Ct. 203, 216 , 90 L.Ed. 145 (1945)

Tim Foley Plumbing Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

68 F. App'x 206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 2003

Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion, we uphold the Board on this matter. Casino Ready Mix, Inc. v. NLRB, 321 F.3d 1190, 1195 (D.C.Cir.2003). … Substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusions to the contrary and we give deference to its expertise on this question. Timsco Inc. v.

Advanced Life Sys. Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

898 F.3d 38 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2018

§ 160(e); Stephens Media, LLC v. … So the Board is entitled to summary enforcement of that uncontested portion of its order. See Allied Mech. Servs. v. NLRB, 668 F.3d 758, 765 (D.C.

In Re Aiken County

645 F.3d 428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2011

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … See Cobell v.