Case law

Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Union No. 1288 v. National Labor Relations Board

390 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1968

We do not enforce the Board’s order as issued, however, because it sweeps too broadly. In Meat and Highway Drivers, Dockmen, etc. v. N. L. R. … B. v.

Bismullah Ex Rel. Bismullah v. Gates

551 F.3d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

Hamdi v. … Hosps. v.

Boyd Leedom, as Chairman and Members of National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108, Afl-Cio, General Cable Corporation v. Boyd Stewart Leedom, Individually and as Chairman and Members of and Constituting National Labor Relations Board

278 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1960

to the union); National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 687 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Kobritz, 1 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 8 , and National Labor Relations Board v.

Gold Coast Restaurant Corporation D/B/A Bryant & Cooper Steakhouse v. National Labor Relations Board

995 F.2d 257 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1993

Corp. v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 967 F.2d 658 (D.C.Cir.1992). Moreover, we owe substantial deference to inferences the Board has drawn from the facts, Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v. … Passaic Daily News v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 1543, 1551 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Board may infer discrimination from both direct and circumstantial evidence, NLRB v.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 223 v. National Labor Relations Board

498 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1974

Duie Pyle, Inc. v. … Another aspect of the Board’s order was set aside in Western Monolithics Concrete Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 446 F.2d 522 (9th Cir. 1971). 39 .

Phillips v. Fulwood

616 F.3d 577 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 6, 2010

Before: GARLAND, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. … Parole Board’s 1972 regulations.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board

511 F.2d 1346 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1975

PER CURIAM: This case was consolidated with United States v. CAB, 167 U.S.App. D.C. 313, 511 F.2d 1315 , decided this date, and arises out of the same factual context. … The applicable law is set out in our prior decisions, each entitled Air Line Pilots Assn. v. CAB, 154 U.S.App. D.C. 320, 475 F.2d 900 (1973) (ALPA I); 161 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 494 F.2d 1118 (1974) (ALPA II); 166 U.S.App.

United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America (Ue), Local 1113 v. National Labor Relations Board

223 F.2d 338 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 1955

See National Labor Belations Board v. Sands Mfg. Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 332, 344 , 59 S.Ct. 508 , 83 L.Ed. 682 . 10 . Phelps Dodge Corp. v. … Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1944, 321 U.S. 332, 337 , 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Mfg. Co., supra, note 9; National Labor Relations Board v.

Pht, Inc., D/B/A Polynesian Hospitality Tours v. National Labor Relations Board

920 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1990

See Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRB, 350 U.S. 270, 278 , 76 S.Ct. 349, 355 , 100 L.Ed. 309 (1956). … See Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 946 , 952 (D.C.Cir.1988).

Leroy Stephens v. United States

271 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 22, 1959

Brinegar v. United States, 1949, 338 U.S. 160, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 . And see Draper v. United States, 1959, 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 . … Maghan v. Jerome, 1937, 67 App.D.C. 9 , 88 F.2d 1001 Any offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year is a felony. All others are misdemeanors. Maghan v. Jerome, supra; see United States v.

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 150-A v. National Labor Relations Board

1 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1993

Compare Retail, Wholesale & Dep’t Store Union v. NLRB, 466 F.2d 380, 390 (D.C.Cir.1972) (applying a five-factor test) with Consolidated Freightways v. … Local 900, Int’l Union of Electrical Workers v.

Local 14055, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

524 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1975

V 31 The Board's position has its persuasiveness. It would be more persuasive were the Board free of Tree Fruits. … See Electrical Workers v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 694 , 71 S.Ct. 954 , 95 L.Ed. 1299 (1951); National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO v.

Laborers' Local Union No. 204, Laborers' International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 715 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1990

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. … See Giant Food Markets, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mar Salle, Inc., D/B/A Mar Salle Convalescent Home

425 F.2d 566 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1970

See NLRB v. Ideal Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co., 330 F.2d 712 (10th Cir. 1964); NLRB v. Lord Baltimore Press, Inc., 300 F.2d 671 (4th Cir. 1962); NLRB v. Dallas City Packing Co., 230 F.2d 708 (5th Cir. 1956); NLRB v. … The board’s summary judgment procedure is new, but its validity has been decided or assumed by every circuit that has considered it. NLRB v. Union Bros., Inc., 403 F.2d 883, 887 (4th Cir. 1968). Accord, NLRB v.

Maschauer v. Downs

289 F. 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1923

Rep. 362; Catlin v. Martin, 69 N. Y. 393 ; Brown v. Mudgett, 40 Vt. 68, 71, 72 ; Sturtevant v. Starin, 19 Wis. 285 . … Harttmann v. Tegart, 12 Kan. 142 ; Brown v. Mudgett, supra. Direct proof that they .were so furnished is not essential.

Synovus Financial Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Southtrust Corporation, Intervenor

952 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1992

Broadcasting Forum v. … See also Citicorp v. Board of Governors of Fed.

Pittsburgh Press Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Pittsburgh Mailers Union Local No. 22, Intervenor

977 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1992

International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 357 v. … Conclusion We are mindful of the deference we owe the Board’s expertise and judgment, see Hammontree v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wilder Mfg. Co., Inc., Textile Workers Union of America, Intervenor

454 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1972

However, the Board contends that since its Supplemental Decision and Order proceeded from this court’s remand order in Textile Workers Union of America v. … Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 67, 68 , 420 F.2d 635, 636 (1969).

Richardson v. Britton

192 F.2d 423 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 1951

We review this case under the rule laid down in O’Leary v. Brown-PacificMaxon, Inc. 5 Whatever may have been the scope and process of review under Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 6 (see Hurley v. … . § 1001 et seq., and the doctrine of Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board 8 apply to these cases.

Harter Tomato Products Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

133 F.3d 934 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1998

HTPC now petitions for review of the Board’s order. The Board cross-applies for enforcement. We review the Board’s factual conclusions for substantial evidence, Universal Camera Corp. v. … Because HTPC failed to present this argument to the Board clearly enough, we cannot consider it now. Consolidated Freightways v.