Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.74s
952 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1992
Broadcasting Forum v. … See also Citicorp v. Board of Governors of Fed.
Cited 37 timesPublishedKenneth B. Crawford v. Robert E. McLaughlin Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia
286 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1960
Upon the basis of an administrative record consisting of the proceedings before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board and before the appellees as the Board of Commissioners, the District Court granted the appellees … See Bradley v. City of Los Angeles, 1942, 55 Cal.App.2d 592 , 131 P.2d 391 .
Cited 6 timesPublished394 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1968
The Board made similar findings. … The Board also found that the economic strike which began in November, 1964, was never converted into an unfair labor practice strike, because the Company engaged in no conduct violative of the Act. . NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublished443 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971
P 11,261 LOCAL 153, INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MARIE PHILLIPS, INC., Respondent. … Stevens & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 417 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1969), which demonstrates what the Board considers to be an appropriate case for such relief.
Cited 1 timesPublished206 F.3d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 2000
In order for the court properly to review the Board's decision, it "must be able to discern the rationale" underlying the Board's conclusions. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Int'l Union v. NLRB, 46 F.3d 82, 90 (D.C. … In order to make NLRB v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedInternational Ass'n of Machinists, Local Lodge No. 311 v. National Labor Relations Board
289 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1961
And see United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329 , 80 S.Ct. 759 , 4 L.Ed.2d 768 . . Board’s brief. . Penn Oil Co. v. … United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329 , 80 S.Ct. 759 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 768 , reversing N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished616 F.3d 577 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 6, 2010
Before: GARLAND, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. … Parole Board’s 1972 regulations.
Cited 29 timesPublished198 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1952
Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 309 U.S. 350 at page 363, 60 S.Ct. 569 , 84 L.Ed. 799 . See, also, Shields v. … Brophy, 1940, 71 App.D.C. 299 , 110 F.2d 539 , 9 A.L.R.2d 1 , and in Brown v. Christman, 1942, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 210 , 126 F.2d 625, 632 .
Cited 23 timesPublished765 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1985
NLRB v. … United Steelworkers v.
Cited 1 timesPublished661 F.2d 959 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 1981
Nasem v. Brown, 193 U.S.App.D.C. 416, 421 , 595 F.2d 801, 806 (1979), quoting Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 68.1(c) (Tent. Draft No. 4, 1977). … See Kennedy v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedLocal Union No. 391, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
543 F.2d 1373 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1976
In National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass’n. v. … See also American Federation of Television and Radio Artists — Baltimore Local, 185 NLRB No. 26 , at 594 (1970) (Member Brown dissenting). .
Cited 3 timesPublishedTim Foley Plumbing Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
68 F. App'x 206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 2003
Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion, we uphold the Board on this matter. Casino Ready Mix, Inc. v. NLRB, 321 F.3d 1190, 1195 (D.C.Cir.2003). … Substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusions to the contrary and we give deference to its expertise on this question. Timsco Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLoucka v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co.
334 F. Supp. 3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 7, 2018
The court in Brown v. Fed. Express Corp. also took judicial notice of the CDC's webpages about Lyme-testing. 62 F.Supp.3d 681 , 687 (W.D. Tenn. 2014). So too here. 2 Mr. Loucka's arguments to strike Mr. … Brown v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co. , 12 F.Supp.3d 88 , 98 (D.D.C. 2014). Certainly, Mr.
Cited 8 timesPublished355 F.2d 842 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1966
Where good faith bargaining has not resolved a key issue and where there are no definite plans for further efforts to break the deadlock, the Board is warranted, see American Ship Building Co. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Intracoastal Terminal, Inc., 286 F.2d 954 (5th Cir. 1961), to make a determination that an impasse existed.
Cited 1 timesPublished17 F.3d 1502 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1994
Allison v. DOT, 908 F.2d at 1029 . … Communities, Inc. v.
Cited 67 timesPublished497 F.2d 608 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 20, 1973
497 F.2d 608 162 U.S.App.D.C. 21 DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Continental Air Lines, Inc., et al., Intervenors. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. … EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Continental Air Lines, Inc., et al., Intervenors. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAyanna Blue v. District of Columbia Public
811 F.3d 14 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 2015
Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 (1997). … Owens v. District of Columbia, 993 A.2d 1085, 1088 (D.C. 2010) (quoting, respectively, Pitts v. District of Columbia, 391 A.2d 803, 807 (D.C. 1978), and Brown v. District of Columbia, 853 A.2d 733, 736 (D.C. 2004)).
Cited 125 timesPublishedAlbra v. Bd. of Trs. of Miami Dade Coll.
296 F. Supp. 3d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 2018
The plaintiff has *183 sued MDC's Board of Trustees and the United States Department of Education ("DOE") under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. § 706 . 1 Pending are MDC's Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to … See Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Moreover, in evaluating subject matter jurisdiction, the court "may consider materials outside the pleadings." Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRetail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Union No. 1288 v. National Labor Relations Board
390 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1968
We do not enforce the Board’s order as issued, however, because it sweeps too broadly. In Meat and Highway Drivers, Dockmen, etc. v. N. L. R. … B. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBismullah Ex Rel. Bismullah v. Gates
551 F.3d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008
Hamdi v. … Hosps. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna