Case law

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

289 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. McCatron, 9 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 212 , 216. … National Labor Relations Board v. Nabors, 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F.2d 272, 276 , certiorari denied 1953, 344 U.S. 865 , 73 S.Ct. 106 , 97 L.Ed. 671 . Accord, National Labor Relations Board v.

Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

328 F.2d 534 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 1964

Local 1976, United Broth, of Carpenters and Joiners of America Union v. National Labor Relations Board (Sand Door case), *538 357 U.S. 93 , 78 S.Ct. 1011 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1180 (1958); N. L. R. B. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Const. Council, 341 U.S. 675, 692 , 71 S.Ct. 943, 953 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 (1951). 12 .

Avecor, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Intervenor

931 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 3, 1991

“When the Board adopts an AU opinion that is in tension with intervening Board precedent, a duty arises for the Board to explain the significant conflicts.” United Food & Commercial Workers Int’l Union, Local 150-A v. … Plating, Inc. v. NLRB, 912 F.2d 883, 888-89 (6th Cir.1990) (remanding with instructions not to issue bargaining order where Board failed to provide requisite analysis); Montgomery Ward & Co. v.

Local Union No. 391, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

543 F.2d 1373 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1976

In National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass’n. v. … See also American Federation of Television and Radio Artists — Baltimore Local, 185 NLRB No. 26 , at 594 (1970) (Member Brown dissenting). .

Robbins v. Footer

553 F.2d 123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1977

Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963); cf. Canterbury v. … E. g., Smith v. Reitman, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 389 F.2d 303, 304 (1967); Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963). . See W.

Lawrence Niskey v. John F. Kelly

859 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2017

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (quoting President v. Vance, 627 F.2d 353, 362 (D.C. Cir. 1980)); see also id. … See Zipes v.

Local 155 of the International Molders and Allied Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, United States Pipe and Foundry Co., Intervenor. United States Pipe and Foundry Company v. National Labor Relations Board

442 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1971

Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 287 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965), and in NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, supra, at 315-318, 85 S.Ct. 955 ; NLRB v.

Catholic Health Initiatives v. Sebelius

617 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2010

Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Therefore the Board majority treated the provision as “compulsory.” Catholic Health Initiatives v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., PRRB Decision No.2007-D14 (Jan. 24, 2007) (“Board Decision”).

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

522 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 14, 1975

522 F.2d 107 173 U.S.App.D.C. 1 CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, American Airlines, Inc., et al., Intervenors. CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … Air Lines, Inc. v.

Luger v. Browning

21 App. D.C. 201 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1903

TIisey *205 v. Peters, 6 App. D. C. 68; Doyle v. McRoberts, 10 App. D. C. 445; Foster v. Antisdel, 14 App. D. C. 552; Bechman v. Wood, 15 App. D. C. 484; Latham, v. Armat, 17 App. D. C. 345; Austin v. Johnson, 18 App. … The distinction is well pointed out by the board of examiners-in-chief in their opinion filed in this case.

International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Canaveral Port Authority, Intervenors

56 F.3d 205 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1995

Co. v. … Van Lines, Inc. v.

General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, Morris L. Shaller, Intervenor

707 F.2d 1559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1983

See GAO v. GAO Personnel Appeals Board, 698 F.2d 516, 534-36 (D.C.Cir.1983). … (General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, No. 81-2401.)

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

392 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1967

B. v. S. E. … This court has consistently upheld the rule, announced by the Board in N. L. R. B. v.

Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

147 F.3d 999 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1998

That is, the Board’s remedy must be truly remedial and not punitive. See NLRB v. Strong, 393 U.S. 357, 359 , 89 S.Ct. 541 , 21 L.Ed.2d 546 (1969); Republic Steel Corp. v. … Therefore, although a reviewing court must give special respect to the Board’s choice of remedy, NLRB v.

Honolulu Typographical Union No. 37, International Typographical Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

401 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1968

Our starting point is NLRB v. … NLRB v. Salem Bldg. Trades Council, 388 F.2d 987 (9th Cir. 1968). 6 . NLRB v. Salem Bldg. Trades Council, supra note 5 , cf. NLRB v.

Local 833, Uaw-Afl-Cio, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Kohler Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Kohler Company, Kohler Company, a Wisconsin Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

300 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 1962

Co., 286 F. 2d 424 (2d Cir. 1960) 24 O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 507-508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951) 25 93 Cong.Rec. 6677-78 (1947) (remarks of Sen. Taft). Cf. O'Leary v. … Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., supra note 23; Swift & Co. v. United States, 316 U.S. 216 , 62 S.Ct. 948 , 86 L.Ed. 1391 (1942); Allegheny Corp. v.

Kenneth B. Crawford v. Robert E. McLaughlin Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia

286 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1960

Upon the basis of an administrative record consisting of the proceedings before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board and before the appellees as the Board of Commissioners, the District Court granted the appellees … See Bradley v. City of Los Angeles, 1942, 55 Cal.App.2d 592 , 131 P.2d 391 .

International Paper Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Intervenors

115 F.3d 1045 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 1997

Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965) (citing NLRB v. Insurance Agents’ Int’l Union, 361 U.S. 477, 498 , 80 S.Ct. 419, 432 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960)). … See Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 50 F.3d 1041, 1051 (D.C.Cir.1995), aff'd, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2116 , 135 L.Ed.2d 521 (1996).

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

77 F.2d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1935

Life Insurance Company v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 621 , 20 L. *372 Ed. 501 ; Buzard v. Houston, 119 U. S. 347 , 7 S. Ct. 249 , 30 L. Ed. 451 . … Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S. 512, 523 , 9 S. Ct. 355 , 32 L. Ed. 764 ; In re Peterson, 253 U. S. 300, 313 , 40 S. Ct. 543 , 64 L. Ed. 919 .

James H. Christiansen v. National Savings and Trust Company

683 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1982

Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 517 F.2d 1044, 1051 , reh. denied, 521 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 944 , 96 S.Ct. 1685 , 48 L.Ed.2d 188 (1976). … Defendants cite Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 213 U.S. 25 , 29 S.Ct. 404 , 53 L.Ed. 682 (1909), for the proposition that an insurance contract does not create a trust in favor of policyholders.