Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.53s
594 F.3d 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 2010
Before: HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. … Osuagwu v.
Cited 49 timesPublishedLocal Union 219, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
265 F.2d 814 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1959
National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co., 1957, 352 U.S. 282, 288 , 77 S.Ct. 330, 334 , 1 L.Ed.2d 331 . … See also National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co., supra, 352 U.S. at page 289 , 77 S.Ct. at page 334 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedTeamsters Local Union No. 515 v. National Labor Relations Board
906 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1990
The Board's interpretation of the Act on this point is a permissible one, to which we must defer. See, e.g., NLRB v. … Brief for Board at 43. The Board then cites as supporting authority Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLaurie L. Abraham v. Graphic Arts International Union
660 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 1981
Appellant also filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board. This was rejected. App. 29, 25, 86. The Board’s action was challenged in the District Court, but was summarily dismissed. … Appellant says Beryl Brown told her that a temporary replacement would be hired. App. 249.
Cited 61 timesPublished426 F.2d 1243 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1970
426 F.2d 1243 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Zanoff, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 22,911 and respondent in No. 22,797. Mr. Roy E. Browne, Akron, Ohio, for respondent in No. 22,911.
Cited 61 timesPublishedLocal Union No. 9735, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
258 F.2d 146 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1958
The Board, in support of the proposition that a strike to modify a collective bargaining agreement without complying with section 8(d) is an unfair labor practice under section 8(b) (3), cites N.L.R.B. v. … And also Burns v. Thomas Cook & Sons, 317 Mass. 398 , 58 N.E. 2d 150, 152 ; Pick Industries, Inc., v. Gebbard-Berghammer, Inc., 262 Wis. 498 , 56 N.W.2d 97, 99 , 57 N.W.2d 519 ; Levy v.
Cited 7 timesPublished420 F.2d 1296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1969
Brown Hill Boswell, Charlotte N.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. J. W. … NLRB v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWarner & Swasey Co. v. Board of Directors, Reconstruction Finance Corp.
170 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1948
Adjustment Board. … Motors, Inc. v. Jesse H. Jones et al., 80 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 153 F.2d 134 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedRadio Officers’ Union, C. T. U.-A. F. of L. v. National Mediation Board
181 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 10, 1950
The Board is given the power to conduct elections. … Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 1943, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . 4 . General Committee of Adjustment of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. R.
Cited 12 timesPublishedTeamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board
863 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1988
See Southwest Regional Joint Bd. v. … See NLRB v.
Cited 0 timesPublished753 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1985
History suggests that they were jointly responsible for the revolution in civil rights that led to and has been epitomized by the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … In a hostile reaction to Brown v.
Cited 55 timesPublished116 F.2d 937 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 14, 1940
For example, Patty v. … Com’r of Internal Revenue, 32 B.T.A. 1075 ; Id., 7 Cir., 84 F.2d 431 [no need for contraction]; Brown v. Com’r of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 73 [business continued at a profit].
Cited 82 timesPublishedJ.W. Kaempfer v. Philip J. Brown
872 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1989
Brown, et al. v. … The Browns filed a "myriad of motions," a majority of which "have simply lacked merit." Kaempfer v. Brown, 684 F.Supp. 319, 324 (D.D.C.1988).
Cited 4 timesUnpublished344 F.2d 171 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1965
Its ensuing order against the Company, however, had been denied enforcement in Cross Company v. NLRB, 286 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1961). … excluded from returning to or remaining at work that, notwithstanding the absence of anti-union animus, the Company’s application of the “three day rule” was an improper penalty for protected activity, relying upon NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
931 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1991
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: The Board of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners of the City of Dalton, Georgia (hereinafter “Dalton”) challenged before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission certain of the costs included … In support of its position that Dalton may challenge the propriety of Southern Natural’s passing the minimum bill payments through its PGA in a § 4 rate case, the Commission relies upon Associated Gas Distributors v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n v. Federal Express Corp.
402 F.3d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 2005
Brown. Before: RANDOLPH, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. … AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986), quoting United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 582 (1960).
Cited 12 timesPublished413 F.2d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 1969
In Electrical Workers v. … The Court also quoted from N.L.R.B. v. Local 294, Int.
Cited 12 timesPublished357 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 1965
The Board petitions for enforcement of the same order. The proceedings before the Board were the usual type under Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. … The petition of the IBEW will therefore be denied and the order of the Board will be enforced. It is so ordered. 1 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedNoble v. United States Parole Commission
194 F.3d 152 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 1999
Board of Parole to the U.S. Parole Commission. See National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-33, s 11231(a)(1), 111 Stat. 712, 745; Franklin v. … See Tyler v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedLotus Suites, Inc., D/B/A Embassy Suites Resort v. National Labor Relations Board
32 F.3d 588 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 23, 1994
Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 280 (D.C.Cir.1988). … NLRB v. Fant Milling Co., 258 F.2d 851 , 854 n. 6 (5th Cir.1958) rev’d, NLRB v. Fant Milling Co., 360 U.S. 301 , 79 S.Ct. 1179 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1243 (1959).
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna