Case law

National Labor Relations Board Union, Local 6 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

842 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1988

However, as the BATF v. … Sebold v. Sebold, 444 F.2d 864 (D.C.

Lodges 1746 & 743, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

416 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1969

Dismissing this factor as an unreliable barometer of employee sentiment, the Board cites NLRB v. … See NLRB v. John S. Swift Co., 302 F.2d 342 (7 Cir. 1962). . Stoner Rubber Co., supra note 2, at 1445; accord, NLRB v. John S. Swift Co., supra note 3. . See cases cited in note 4 supra. . NLRB v.

NCRNC, LLC v. NLRB

94 F.4th 67 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 2024

Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67–68 (2008). … Corp v. NLRB, 995 F.2d 257, 266 (D.C.

Flaherty v. Ross

373 F. Supp. 3d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 9, 2019

In Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board , 482 F.2d 710 , 715 (D.C. … Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown , 910 F.Supp. 1138 , 1157-59 (E.D. Va. 1995). In fact, the D.C. Circuit in Dong specifically cited J.H.

Bender v. Jordan

623 F.3d 1128 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 22, 2010

Griffin V. Canada Jr. entered an appearance.  2 Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, and EDWARDS and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judges. … Bender v. Jordan, 515 F.

Cazada G. D. Saylor v. United States Board of Parole, R. A. Chappell, Chairman

345 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1965

This issue was raised in the District Court by a civil complaint for declaratory relief against the members of the United States Board of Parole, which action was dismissed pursuant to a grant of defendants’ motion for summary … upon the demand of the law violator alone, entail any sacrifice by the federal government of its right to exact full satisfaction of the penalties imposed for crimes against it, seems to us to be the teaching of Jenkins v.

Foster v. Massey

407 F.2d 343 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1968

See Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 330 U.S. 469 , 67 S.Ct. 801 , 91 L.Ed. 1028 (1947); Voehl v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 288 U.S. 162 , 53 S.Ct. 380 , 77 L.Ed. 676 (1933); Clark v. Commercial Casualty Ins. … O’Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman and Grylls Associates, 380 U.S. 359 , 85 S.Ct. 1012 , 13 L.Ed.2d 895 (1965); O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

Local Union No. 2188, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

494 F.2d 1087 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1974

In No. 72-1994, Local 2188, IBEW v. NLRB and Western Electric Co. and No. 72-1995, Local 1974, IBEW v. … The Collyer doctrine has been applied by the Board in numerous subsequent cases and has received judicial approval in the Second Circuit. Nabisco, Inc. v. NLRB, 479 F.2d 770 (2d Cir. 1973).

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Brandt Airflex Corporation and U. S. Fire Insurance Company and John F. Delinski, John F. Delinski v. Brandt Airflex Corporation, Employer/respondent, and U. S. Fire Insurance Company, Carrier/respondent, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Brandt Airflex Corporation, Employer, and U. S. Fire Insurance Company, Carrier v. John F. Delinski, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

645 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1981

Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, 104 F.2d 227, 228 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 640 , 59 S.Ct. 1033 , 83 L.Ed. 1521 (1939); cf. Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. … O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951).

Anita Smith v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Paul R. Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy

435 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 28, 1970

Neumeyer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 187 Pa.Super. 321, 328 , 144 A.2d 606, 609 (1958). … See Constantopoulos v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security, 107 N.H. 400 , 223 A.2d 418 (1966).

United States Department of State v. Coombs

482 F.3d 577 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 2007

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 844 (1984). But State argues that the phrase “falsely prejudicial” is in no way susceptible to the Board’s interpretation. … State relies heavily on Brown v.

James Brown, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Secretary of the Army, Appellant/cross-Appellee

86 F.3d 225 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1996

’s fees is not to be applied retroactively, see 78 F.3d 645 (D.C.Cir.1996), is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Irwin v. … Recall that the Congress enacted the interest provision in direct response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Library of Congress v.

Robert O. Clouser, as Members of the Board of Zoning Adjustment v. King David

309 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1962

The Board denied a variance and the plaintiff filed a complaint for injunctive relief against the Board. … Such facts alone do not bring a case within the Board’s authority to allow a variance.

Laborers' District Council Of Georgia And South Carolina v. National Labor Relations Board

501 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1974

A.F. of L. v. NLRB, 308 U.S. 401, 410 , 60 S.Ct. 300, 304 , 84 L.Ed. 347 (1940). The Board has been entrusted with complete control of election proceedings. Excelsior Laundry v. … There is a broad presumption in favor of the remedy chosen by the Board. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 845 (1941); NLRB v. Rutter Rex Mfg.

Sheet Metal Workers, Local Union No. 91 v. National Labor Relations Board

905 F.2d 417 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1990

Workers v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027 , 1030 (D.C.Cir.1986) (quoting NLRB v. … Workers v.

Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

202 F.2d 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1953

National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 1939, 306 U.S. 240, 255 , 59 S.Ct. 490, 496 . 10 . National Labor Relations Board v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Power Co., 1941, 314 U.S. 469, 479-480 , 62 S.Ct. 344 , 86 L.Ed. 348 ; Continental Oil Co. v.

United States v. Karen R. Young and Nathaniel J. Pugh

598 F.2d 296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1979

Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 172-73, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949); Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); United States v. … See United States v. Davis, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 400 , 458 F.2d 819 (1972); United States v. Hall, 187 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 535 F.2d 857 (1976); United States v.

Microimage Display Division of Xidex Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 619, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Local 619, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

924 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1991

Brown, 380 U.S. at 287-88 , 85 S.Ct. at 985-87 ; see also NLRB v. … Brown, 380 U.S. at 286 , 85 S.Ct. at 985 ; see also Radio Officers' Union v. NLRB, 347 U.S. 17, 42-44 , 74 S.Ct. 323, 336-338 , 98 L.Ed. 455 (1954).

Post Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 2009

The employer contends the Board’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence. In accord with our “highly deferential” standard of review, Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., v. … relationship,” NLRB v.

St. Francis Federation of Nurses & Health Professionals v. National Labor Relations Board

729 F.2d 844 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1984

International Union v. … Some courts indeed have imposed a duty on the Board to inquire into subsequent developments before issuing a bargaining order. See, e.g., NLRB v.