Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.94s
485 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1973
FOR YEARS AT THE EMPORIUM BLACK, BROWN, YELLOW, AND RED PEOPLE, HAVE WORKED AT THE LOWEST JOBS, AT THE LOWEST LEVELS. … B. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd., 349 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965). 45 For these reasons the decision and order of the Board are reversed and remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Cited 12 timesPublishedInternational Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
353 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1965
National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221, 236 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963). … In National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedJames H. Neal v. District of Columbia and John Lattimore
131 F.3d 172 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1998
WALD, Circuit Judge: This is a companion case to Brown v. Plaut, 131 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997). … We find that, under the analysis mandated by Sandin v.
Cited 7 timesPublished420 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1969
See United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 265 , 66 S.Ct. 1062 , 90 L.Ed. 1206 (1946) and Griggs v. Allegheny County, supra. … United States v. 15,909 Acres, 176 F.Supp. 447, 448 (S.D.Cal.1958). 7 . The final opinion of the Board appears in the Joint Appendix of the parties in the ease of National Capital Airlines v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRoad Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board
600 F.2d 918 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1979
NLRB, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 113, 115 , 362 F.2d 943, 945-46 (1966); see also Midwest Regional Joint Board v. NLRB, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 413 , 417, 564 F.2d 434 , 438 (1977). … No distinction exists between the effect of the Board’s theory and use of the waiver standard in this court’s earlier cases. In International Union, UAW v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEmerson Emory v. Secretary of the Navy
819 F.2d 291 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1987
See, e.g., Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534, 539-40 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953); Reaves v. Ainsworth, 219 U.S. 296, 306 (1911). … Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733 , 94 S.Ct. 2547 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1974). It is precisely the role of the courts to determine whether those rights have been violated. Dillard v. Brown, 652 F.2d 316, 320 (3d Cir.1981).
Cited 37 timesPublishedUnited Steelworkers of America, Local Union 14534 v. National Labor Relations Board
983 F.2d 240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1993
Recently, however, the Board has adopted a more restrictive reading of the Truitt disclosure requirements. The Board’s change of heart apparently resulted from NLRB v. Harvstone Mfg. … The Board contends that the Union did not thereby render its offer conditional. See Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished564 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977
We are to sustain the Board's determinations if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S 278, 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Universal Camera Corp. v. … NLRB v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 287 , 85 S.Ct. 980 ; Mueller Brass Co. v. NLRB, supra, 544 F.2d at 819 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedDasisa v. University of District of Columbia Board of Trustees
279 F. App'x 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 2008
See Allen v. … .”); Apotex, Inc. v. FDA 393 F.3d 210, 217-18 (D.C.Cir.2004) (barring further claims based on the same “nucleus of facts”). Appellant filed another case arising from the same set of circumstances. See Dasisa v.
Cited 0 timesPublished114 F.2d 599 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1940
Young v. United States, 5 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 490 : People v. Vick, 1926, 235 Mich. 475 , 209 N.W. 584 [with which compare People v. Redman, 1930, 250 Mich. 334 , 230 N.W. 196 ]; Mitchell v. … United States, 9 Cir., 1926, 15 F.2d 168 ; Miller v. United States, 7 Cir., 1931, 53 F.2d 316 ; Beard v. United States, 8 Cir., 1932, 59 F.2d 940 ; Love v. United States, 9 Cir., 1935, 74 F.2d 988 ; United States v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedAlbrecht v. Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits System
357 F.3d 62 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 2004
Cir. 2002) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … See, e.g., Woodbury v.
Cited 78 timesPublishedWorld Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenor
447 F.2d 377 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 1971
American Airlines v. CAB, 98 U.S.App. D.C. 348, 354, 235 F.2d 845 , 851 (1956). … Petitioner in its brief relies on Pan American World Airways v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGreensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board
262 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1958
262 F.2d 689 GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Intervenors. No. 14382. … PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board entered after the Board had completed proceedings undertaken as a result of our order of remand in Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v
Cited 0 timesPublishedRaymond F. Kravis Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
550 F.3d 1183 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 2008
BPH & Co. v. NLRB, 333 F.3d 213, 217 (D.C. … ’s decision in NLRB v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedInternational Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers v. Subversive Activities Control Board
353 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1965
American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 380 U.S. 503 , 85 S.Ct. 1148 , 14 L.Ed.2d 39 (1965); and Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. … These eases, and Brown in particular, may or may not represent, as petitioner claims, significant variations in the Supreme Court’s thinking from Communist Party of United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublished388 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1967
SMITH, Appellant, v. .hugh RIVERS, Chairman, District of Columbia Board of Parole et al., Appellees. Elbert Henry WHITE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE et al., Appellees. John L. JACOBS, Appellant, v. … Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, No. 20591, infra. 3 2.
Cited 12 timesPublishedFerro-Co Corporation v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board
248 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1957
Maritime Comm. v. California Eastern Line 6 would apply, and there would be an end to the matter. … Trace v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 21 T.C. 303 (1953). 8 . See. 3, 66 Stat. 753 . 9 . S.Rep.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board Union, Local 6 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
842 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1988
However, as the BATF v. … Sebold v. Sebold, 444 F.2d 864 (D.C.
Cited 1 timesPublished416 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1969
Dismissing this factor as an unreliable barometer of employee sentiment, the Board cites NLRB v. … See NLRB v. John S. Swift Co., 302 F.2d 342 (7 Cir. 1962). . Stoner Rubber Co., supra note 2, at 1445; accord, NLRB v. John S. Swift Co., supra note 3. . See cases cited in note 4 supra. . NLRB v.
Cited 25 timesPublished94 F.4th 67 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 2024
Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67–68 (2008). … Corp v. NLRB, 995 F.2d 257, 266 (D.C.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna