Case law

Manor Care of Easton, PA., LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

661 F.3d 1139 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 22, 2011

The Board is entitled to summary enforcement of these uncontested findings. Flying Food Grp., Inc. v. NLRB, 471 F.3d 178, 181 (D.C. … We therefore conclude that substantial evidence supports the  4 Board’s Wright Line determination. See, e.g., Tasty Baking Co. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 114, 126-27 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. First National S. S. Co.

119 F.2d 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 1941

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation v. … Fleet Corporation v.

George L. Abell v. Samuel Spencer, President, Board of Commissioners, District of Columbia

225 F.2d 568 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1955

Ex parte Collett, 1949, 337 U.S. 55, 61 , 69 S.Ct. 944 , 93 L.Ed. 1207 ; Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1947, 330 U.S. 485, 492 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1043 ; Gemsco v.

Andrew Burinskas v. National Labor Relations Board, Ferrell-Hicks Chevrolet, Inc., Intervenor. Ferrell-Hicks Chevrolet, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

357 F.2d 822 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 1966

357 F.2d 822 123 U.S.App.D.C. 143 Andrew BURINSKAS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Ferrell-Hicks Chevrolet, Inc., Intervenor. FERRELL-HICKS CHEVROLET, INC., Petitioner, v. … Burinskas v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

487 F.2d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1973

General Industrial Employees Union, Local 42, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

951 F.2d 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 1991

See, e.g., Teamsters Local Union No. 515 v. … See 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v.

Juanita Kirkland v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation

70 F.3d 629 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1996

.”); Kuhn v. … In Rosden v.

Maurice Schick v. George J. Reed, Chairman of the United States Board of Parole

483 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 1, 1973

The United States Board of Parole has declined to consider him for parole although in the absence of the condition attached to the President’s commutation he would be eligible for such consideration. … Schick filed this action in the District Court, seeking a declaration of his eligibility for consideration for parole pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4202 , and an order directing the members of the' Board promptly to consider him

735 Putnam Pike Operations, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

474 F. App'x 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 2012

The Board’s decision will not be disturbed on appeal if the factual findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record, id. § 160(e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), and the Board acts in accordance with its precedent, Manhattan Ctr. Studios, Inc. v. NLRB, 452 F.3d 813, 816 (D.C.Cir.2006).

Susquehanna International Group, LLP v. Securities & Exchange Commission

866 F.3d 442 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 2017

or to a committee of the Board. … Brown, Executive Vice President, OCC, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, SEC at 6 n.10 (Feb. 23, 2015) (J.A. 85 n.10).

Physicians & Surgeons Ambulance Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

477 F. App'x 743 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 2012

Bus Co., Inc. v. … Contrary to PSAS’s urging, however, the Board’s “interpretation of its own precedent is entitled to deference.” Ceridian Corp. v. NLRB, 435 F.3d 352, 355 (D.C.Cir.2006) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

Price, John A. v. Bernanke, Ben

470 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 2006

Wheatley, Associate General Counsel.  2 Before: GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. … The district court granted the Board’s Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment, Price v. Greenspan, 374 F.

District No. 9, International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

315 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1962

This case falls in the same general category as Los Angeles Mailers Union No. 9 v. N. L. R. B., 114 U.S.App.D.C.-, 311 F.2d 121 , recently decided by this court. … Our judgment is that the order of the Board is enforced. 1 . The Greater St.

Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 71 v. National Labor Relations Board

553 F.2d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1977

The legislative history clearly reflects, and the early Board cases recognized, 1 that § 9(b)(3) marks an extremely narrow exception to the National Labor Act’s general policy of employee free choice. 2 In adopting this exception … The Board’s rationale would even apply to delivery-men: The danger of divided loyalty which Congress sought to eliminate may not be quite so far-reaching in the case of armored-car guards, but it is, nevertheless, present

District of Columbia v. Straus

590 F.3d 898 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 8, 2010

Brown, and Roger A. … The district court denied an award of fees on the ground that the District failed to qualify as a “prevailing party” under the IDEA as defined by the Supreme Court in Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.

Williams Enterprises, Inc., a Division of Williams Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

956 F.2d 1226 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1992

Agnes, 871 F.2d at 147 ; see also Avecor Inc. v. … The Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1466 v. National Labor Relations Board

795 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1986

In NLRB v. … Lewis, Inc. v.

Air New Zealand Limited v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenor

726 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1984

V 1981). The Board may grant an exemption from this requirement when it finds that would be in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. § 1386 (b) (1976 & Supp. V 1981). … V 1981).

Piersall, Charles v. Winter, Donald C.

435 F.3d 319 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 2006

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. … We have many times reviewed the decisions of boards for correction of military records “in light of familiar principles of administrative law.” See, e.g., Kreis v.

Paul Wendel v. Samuel Spencer, President, Board of Commissioners

217 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1954

examining board in naturopathy. … See Perkins v. Elg, 1939, 307 U.S. 325 , at pages 349-350, 59 S.Ct. 884 , 83 L.Ed. 1320 .