Case law

Robert H. Mourning v. National Labor Relations Board, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Intervenor

505 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1974

See SEC v. Chenery Corp. (I), 318 U.S. 80, 92 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). 9 . See Bryant Chucking Grinder Co. v. NLRB, 389 F.2d 565, 568 (2d Cir. 1967), applying the dictum in NLRB v. … Since the Labor Board, as other administrative agencies, has no particular expertise in the area of fair procedures, cf. Ridge Radio Corp. v.

Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

629 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1980

Corp. v. … See the sharp criticism leveled at the Board's mechanical issuance of bargaining orders in NLRB v.

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

681 F.2d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1982

E.g., Midwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 434 , 443 (D.C.Cir.1977); Teamsters Local 633 v. NLRB, 509 F.2d 490 , 493-95 (D.C.Cir.1974). … NLRB v.

Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.

173 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 1949

Justice Brown then proceeded to specifically quote with great approval the leading case, Wardell v. Railroad Company, 103 U.S. 651 , 26 L.Ed. 509 . … Brown, 3 Cir., 235 F. 669 . 18 Farmers’ Loan, etc. Co. v. New York, etc. R. Co., 1896, 150 N.Y. 410 , 44 N.E. 1043 , 34 L.R.A. 76 , 55 Am.St.Rep. 689 ; Barr v. N. Y., etc., Co., 1884, 96 N.Y. 444 ; George v.

Newspaper Guild of Greater Philadelphia, Local 10 v. National Labor Relations Board

636 F.2d 550 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 1980

Local 425 v. … However, the final decision with regard to that issue must be made by the Board upon remand in light of the standards laid down herein. . See, Chemical Workers v.

Warehousemen & Mail Order Employees, Local No. 743 v. National Labor Relations Board

302 F.2d 865 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1962

National Labor Relations Board v. Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342, 349 , 78 S.Ct. 718 (1958). . National Labor Relations Board v. … B. v. Katz, 289 F.2d 700 (2 Cir.), cert. granted, 368 U.S. 811 , 82 S.Ct. 53 , 7 L.Ed.2d 20 (1961); and see N. L. R. B. v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5 Cir. 1960). . National Labor Relations Board v.

Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

755 F.3d 980 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2014

Brown also testified he attempted to smuggle marijuana into the Jail the weekend before the June 2006 assault. S.A. 290–91.  6 Brown v. D.C. Dep’t of Corrections, 2006 SC3 014278 (D.C. … Smith v.

George, Diane v. Leavitt, Michael

407 F.3d 405 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2005

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … See Weldon v.

Muñoz v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

427 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 2011

MEMORANDUM Appellant, Emma Muñoz, a tenured professor, sued the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (“UDC”) alleging violations of Title VII, the D.C. Human Rights Act (the “D.C. … Martinez v. Bureau of Prisons, 444 F.3d 620, 623 (D.C.Cir.2006); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668 (D.C.Cir.2004).

City of Oakland Ex Rel. Board of Port Commissioners v. Federal Maritime Commission

724 F.3d 224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 2013

Before: HENDERSON and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Co. v.

Jackson v. Gonzales

496 F.3d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2007

Stewart, *709 352 F.3d at 429 ; see also Browning v. Dep’t of the Army, 436 F.3d 692, 698 (6th Cir.2006) (“Questioning [the employer’s] hiring criteria is not within the province of this court_”). … See Lamb v.

Atlantic Veal & Lamb, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F. App'x 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 2005

unless ... those determinations are ‘hopelessly incredible,’ ‘self-contradictory,’ or ‘patently unsupportable.’ ” Cadbury Beverages, Inc. v. … NLRB, 160 F.3d 24, 28 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. NLRB, 147 F.3d 999, 1004 (D.C.Cir.1998)).

Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (State of Rhode Island, Intervenor)

178 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 1949

scope of the proceeding is plainly within the Board’s discretion. … As the Board points out, “The large number of applications filed with the Board and the fact that they are invariably over-lapping, both as to the areas to be served and the type of services to be performed, necessitates

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Northeast Airlines, Inc., Atlas Corporation, Intervenors

321 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 3, 1963

Co. v. … Further, in City of Pittsburgh v.

Teamsters Local Union 769 v. National Labor Relations Board

532 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1976

Local 289 v. … Schwarzenbach-Huber Co. v.

Hampton Lumber Mills-Washington, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

38 F. App'x 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2002

Material Corp. v. … Hampton failed to make this argument to the Board, however, and, accordingly, the court lacks jurisdiction to consider it now. See Parsippany Hotel Mgmt. Co. v.

Bethel v. Jefferson

589 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1978

Love v. Pullman Co., 404 U.S. 522, 527 , 92 S.Ct. 616, 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 679, 685 (1972); Bell v. Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226, 230 , 557 F.2d 849, 853 (1977); Coles v. … See Bell v. Brown, supra note 54 , 181 U.S.App.D.C. at 230 , 557 F.2d at 853 . . Coles v. Penny, supra note 54 , 174 U.S.App.D.C. at 284 , 531 F.2d at 616 . . Love v.

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

509 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1975

ALPA v. … Such an action does not constitute official action by the Board and the Board could have changed its mind. See Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v.

Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Kramer

44 App. D.C. 154b · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1915

Co. v. Snashall, 3 App. D. C. 420; Harbison v. Metropolitan R. Co. 9 App. D. C. 60, 9 Am. Neg. Cas. 168 ; Brown v. Washington & G. R. Co. 11 App. D. C. 37; Brightwood R. Co. v. Carter, 12 App. D. … V. R. Co. v. Chapman, 26 App. D. C. 472, 6 Ann. Cas. 721; Capital Traction Co. v. Brown, 29 App. D. C. 473, 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 831.

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

789 F.2d 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1986

We, in turn, once again remanded the case to the Board. In Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. … In NLRB v.