Case law

Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n

663 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 12, 1981

E. g., Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 , 81 S.Ct. 523 , 5 L.Ed.2d 464 (1961). … See generally Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943).

Skyline Distributors, a Division of Acme Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

99 F.3d 403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1996

In NLRB v. … The Board continues to ignore these admonitions and, thus, has faced a string of reversals in this circuit. See, e.g., Somerset Welding & Steel, Inc. v. NLRB, 987 F.2d 777 (D.C.Cir.1993); Caterair Int’l v.

Teamsters National United Parcel Service Negotiating Committee v. National Labor Relations Board

17 F.3d 1518 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1994

See id. at 326-30 (Board Order); see also International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union v. … Both the Company and the Union attack the Board’s holding as contrary to Board precedent and therefore arbitrary and capricious. See International Union of Petroleum & Industrial Workers v.

Waukesha State Bank and Wabank & Co. v. National Credit Union Administration Board

968 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1992

As the Supreme Court noted in Langley v. … (quoting Heckler v.

Patricia A. Smith v. Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia

380 F.2d 632 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1967

And it is urged that this is especially true of suits arising under the Civil Rights Act, as witness McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). … In Powell v.

Fruit And Vegetable Packers And Warehousemen Local 760 v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963

316 F.2d 389 114 U.S.App.D.C. 388 FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PACKERS AND WAREHOUSEMEN LOCAL 760 Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner, v. … by the Board on this issue contravenes the spirit, if not the precise holding, of National Labor Relations Board v.

The Union National Bank of Clarksburg, a Corporation v. Home Loan Bank Board

233 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1956

Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 278, 225 F.2d 924, 929 . Cf. First National Bank of McKeesport v. Home Loan Bank Board, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 194 , 225 F.2d 33 . Affirmed. 1 . … Mitchell v. Cohen, 333 U.S. 411, 417 , 68 S.Ct. 518 , 92 L.Ed. 774 . 3 . 77 Cong.Rec. 2480, 2481, 2506, 4987.

Independent Community Bankers of America v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

195 F.3d 28 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1999

.”); NRDC v. … In Securities Industries Ass’n v. Board of Governors of the Fed.

Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor

147 F.3d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1998

The Board issued the first of its orders on remand from our decision in Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. NLRB, 28 F.3d 1243 (D.C.Cir.1994). … v.

United Steel, Paper & Forestry v. National Labor Relations Board

179 F. App'x 61 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 2006

Although we give deference to Board decisions, we cannot uphold a decision that is inconsistent with controlling precedent. Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs, Local 147, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 294 F.3d 186, 188 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Because the Board’s conclusion that the lockout was lawful is inconsistent with the controlling precedent the Supreme Court set forth in NLRB v.

Cummings v. Department of the Navy

279 F.3d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 2002

Approximately seven months after Cummings’s Hornet training began, the Navy convened a Field Naval Aviator Evaluation Board (Evalua *1053 tion Board) to assess her flying skills and potential. … In Bois v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors

309 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1962

Templeton Brown, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Robert L. … Part 302 2 Procedural Regulations, Part 300.2 3 We are advised that the Board's Regulations have since been clarified 4 WKAT, Inc. v.

Hellenic Lines Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of America

295 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1961

The carriers and conferences contend that the respective orders directed to them are invalid for substantially the same reasons presented in Montship Lines, Ltd. v. … of the Board’s regulatory duties under that Act, the Board needs the reports, accounts, records, rates, charges and memoranda of facts and transactions hereinafter described * * *.

Pontiac Nursing Home, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

173 F. App'x 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 2006

The Board has “broad discretion to assess the propriety and results of representation elections.” AOTOP, L.L.C. v. NLRB, 331 F.3d 100 , 103 (D.C.Cir.2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Randell Warehouse of Ariz., Inc. v.

McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and Its Related Divisions v. National Labor Relations Board

59 F.3d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1995

NLRB v. … , SEC v.

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

502 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1974

Hall v. Cole, supra, at 4-5 . … Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 745 v. NLRB, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 500 F.2d 768 (1974); West Texas Utilities Co. v.

Boeing Airplane Co. v. Coggeshall

280 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1960

Rosseau v. Langley, supra. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills, 3 Cir., 1939, 106 F.2d 263, 267 ; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United States, 1958, 157 F.Supp. 939 , 141 Ct.Cl. 38 ; Zacher v.

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

440 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1970

This is the second time within the year that Tiidee has been before this court on charges of unfair labor practice by the Board. See IUERMW [Tiidee Products] v. … The Board’s application for enforcement of the order as issued is granted.

Boeing Airplane Company v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board v. Boeing Airplane Company, Boeing Airplane Company, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Cross-Appellee

280 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1960

280 F.2d 654 BOEING AIRPLANE COMPANY, Appellant v. Thomas COGGESHALL, Chairman, The Renegotiation Board, Appellee. Thomas COGGESHALL, Chairman, The Renegotiation Board, Appellant v. BOEING AIRPLANE COMPANY, Appellee. … v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Associates, Inc.

607 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1979

App. 98-101 (ALJ’s Decision and Order); App. 115-20 (Benefits Review Board Decision). . Banks v. … .”); O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, supra, 340 U.S. at 508 , 71 S.Ct. at 472 (“the findings are to be accepted unless they are unsupported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.”). . App. 105. .