Case law

United States v. Brown

505 F.2d 476 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 17, 1974

S. v. Brown 72-1049, 73-1815 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 9/17/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED 2 --------------- * The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment.

United States v. Brown

495 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1974

S. v. Brown 73-1424 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 4/22/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

United States v. Brown

486 F.2d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1973

S. v. Brown 73-1309 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 11/9/73 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED * * The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment.

United States v. Brown, Monte

374 F.3d 1326 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 2004

United States v. Brown, 261 F. Supp. 2d 1, 4-6 (D.D.C. 2003). The search of the trunk was another matter. Id. at 6-10. … United States v. Rocky Brown, 334 F.3d 1161, 1170 (D.C. Cir. 2003); see also United States v. Turner, 119 F.3d 18, 20 (D.C.  4 Cir. 1997).

FedEx Home Delivery v. National Labor Relations Board

849 F.3d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 2017

Symphony Orchestra v. … Bankers of America v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 195 F.3d 28, 34 (D.C.

Mueller, Douglas J. v. England, Gordon R.

485 F.3d 1191 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 2007

Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 538 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1989)); see Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … As we explained in Cone v.

Brown v. Selfridge

34 App. D.C. 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 1910

Pickford v. Hudson, 32 App. D. C. 480-486. … Slater v. Taylor, 31 App. D. C. 104.

Brown v. Bliss

13 App. D.C. 279 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 1898

Chief Justice Alvey delivered the opinion of .the Court : The bill in this case was filed by the appellant, David Brown, to obtain an injunction against Hon. Cornelius N. … Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Smith, 165 U. S. 28 .

Brown v. Bradley

6 App. D.C. 207 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1895

S. 544 ; Muller v. Ehlers, 91 U. S. 249 , and United States v. Breitling, 20 How. 253 , do not support the contention of the petitioners. … first and last of these cases the judgments were rendered at the same terms at which the trials were had; and no such question arose, or could arise, as *224 is here presented to us ; and in the other case, that of Muller v.

Brown v. Gottschalk

484 F.2d 813 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1973

This court in Comm'n of Patents v. … Schindler v. Comm'n of Patents, 269 F.Supp. 630 (D.C.D.C. 1967); Monsanto Co. v. Kamp, 269 F.Supp. 818 (D.C.D.C.1967).

Brown v. Macfarland

19 App. D.C. 525 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1902

These instances are referred to, in the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Bauman v. Ross, 167 U.

Brown v. Mukasey

298 F. App'x 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008

See Wayte v. U.S., 470 U.S. 598, 607 , 105 S.Ct. 1524 , 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985). Such discretionary decisions are not generally subject to judicial review. See Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v.

Brown v. Suter

298 F. App'x 15 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 2008

Moreover, appellant’s damages claims are barred by Heck v. … See also Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 , 117 S.Ct. 1584 , 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

50 F.3d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1995

Fibre-board Paper Prods. Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 211 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 402 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964). … Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 821 F.Supp. 20 (D.D.C.1993), reprinted in J.A. 2911. Finally, on March 1, 1994, the District Court awarded the Players’ counsel $1,744,-578.41 in attorney’s fees. Brown v.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

146 F.R.D. 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1992

See, e.g., Genden v. … See, for instance, Newberry v. Washington Post Co., 71 F.R.D. 25 (D.D.C.1976); Ralston v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 61 F.R.D. 427 (W.D.Mo.1973).

Gorman v. National Transportation Safety Board

558 F.3d 580 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2009

National Transportation Safety Board Steven A. … Bowman v.

Brown v. Roberts

298 F. App'x 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008

Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (quoting Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv., 753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir. 1985) (other quotations omitted)). … (per curiam) (denying mandamus petition against Clerk of Supreme Court for lack of jurisdiction), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 844 , 113 S.Ct. 131 , 121 L.Ed.2d 85 (1992); Panko v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

493 F. App'x 110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2012

We hold that, in light of the circumstances of and arguments made in this case, Brown was required to demonstrate constructive discharge to receive front pay and back pay. Clark v. … We have also reviewed the trial record and conclude that the district court’s determination that Brown failed to demonstrate constructive discharge was not clearly erroneous. Fogg v.

Brown v. Commercial Fire Insurance

21 App. D.C. 325 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1903

Brown v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394. *339 Substantially tbe same rule prevails in Massachusetts. King v. State Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 7 Cush. 1 , 6; Fogg v. Middlesex Ins. Co., 10 Cush. 337 , 346; Palmer Sav. … King v. State Mut. Ins. Co., I Cush. 1, 6; Brown *341 v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394; Cone v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 60 N. Y. 619, 624 .

Fields, Beverly v. Off Eddie Johnson

459 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 2006

Relying on Browning v. Clerk, U.S. … Brewster, 408 U.S. at 528 , 92 S.Ct. 2531 ; see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408, 415 (D.C.Cir.1995).