Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.34s
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997
("the Board") alleg- ing bad faith bargaining by Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co. … The Board ruled that in order to show fraudulent concealment, IAM had to show an affirmative act of conceal- ment. See Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 321 N.L.R.B. at 924 (citing Richards v. Mileski, 662 F.2d 65, 70 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFood Store Employees Union, Local 347 v. National Labor Relations Board
422 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1969
In exercising this judgment the Board owed no deference to its trial examiner. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 494-496 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. … Workers v. NLRB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 389, 298 F.2d 297 , 303 (1961) cert. denied, Gulf Bottlers Inc. v. NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 , (1962); see also NLRB v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedTCI Cablevision of Montana, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
53 F. App'x 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2002
NLRB v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 379 U.S. 21, 23 , 85 S.Ct. 171 , 13 L.Ed.2d 1 (1964). The Board has held that the employer has the burden of showing an “honest belief that the employee has engaged in serious misconduct.” … , Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAvante at Boca Raton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
54 F. App'x 502 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 2002
JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. … It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED for the reasons stated in the Board’s opinions in Avante at Boca Raton, Inc., 323 NLRB 555 (1997), and Avante at Boca Raton, Inc., 334 NLRB No. 56 (2001).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMi Pueblo Foods v. National Labor Relations Board
453 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 2011
The Board “need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit.” Cleveland Const., Inc. v. NLRB, 44 F.3d 1010, 1013 (D.C.Cir.1995) (emphasis added). … The Court will uphold a bargaining-unit determination so long as the Board’s conclusions are “consistent with its precedent” and its factual findings are “supported by substantial evidence.” RC Aluminum Indus. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOzburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
689 F. App'x 639 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 2016
See Wright Line, 251 N.L.R.B. 1083 , 1089 (1980); see also Chevron Mining, Inc. v. NLRB, 684 F.3d 1318, 1326-28 (D.C. Cir. 2012). … See Fort Dearborn Co. v. NLRB, 827 F.3d 1067, 1072 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLee Lumber And Building Material Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
117 F.3d 1454 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997
Ass'n v. DOT, 105 F.3d 702, 705 (D.C.Cir.1997) (citing NLRB v. … But see NLRB v.
Cited 4 timesPublished569 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 1977
Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … See Brown v. GSA, supra, at 833-34, 96 S.Ct. 1961 . On May 7, 1975 Richardson received the April 25, 1975 decision which was prominently titled “Notice of Final Decision of Agency.”
Cited 41 timesPublishedW. W. Chambers Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
279 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1960
Chambers Co., Inc. asks us to set aside, and the National Labor Relations Board asks us to enforce, an order of the Board. … The Board has jurisdiction because the Company’s undertaking business is “within the District of Columbia”. 29 U.S.C.A. § 152 (6).
Cited 1 timesPublishedInner City Press v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System
130 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997
See, e.g., Syno- vus Financial Corp. v. Board of Governors, 952 F.2d 426, 432 (D.C. … See United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 116 S.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFox River Neighborhood Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board
5 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 2001
JUDGMENT This petition for review was considered on the record from the Surface Transportation Board (STB) and on the briefs of counsel. … See Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, 90 F.3d 580, 588-89 (D.C.Cir.1996).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
386 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1967
NLRB v. Greater New York Broadcasting Corp., 147 F.2d 337, 338 (2d Cir. 1945); NLRB v. Standard Oil Corp., 138 F.2d 885, 889 (2d Cir. 1943) (per L. Hand, J.). … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedChildren's Hospital & Research Center of Oakland, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
793 F.3d 56 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2015
See United Steelworkers of Am. v. … .”); Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. NLRB, 28 F.3d 1243, 1249 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (“It is up to the Board, not the courts, to make labor policy.”).
Cited 14 timesPublishedSheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
989 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1993
See LTV Electrosystems, Inc. v. NLRB, 408 F.2d 1122, 1127 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 337 F.Supp. 381 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. … The Board’s findings are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence and we give “substantial deference to inferences drawn from the facts.” Avecor, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedInvestment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
551 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1977
See Brief for Respondent Board of Governors at 46 n. 17, National Courier Ass’n v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 516 F.2d 1229 (1975). … Agents v. Board of Governors, supra, 160 U.S.App.D.C. at 145-146 , 489 F.2d at 1270-71 . See also Alabama Ass’n of Ins. Agents v.
Cited 125 timesPublishedNational Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Greater Baltimore Committee, Intervenor
300 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1962
Civil Aeronautics Board, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 369-370 , 192 F.2d 417 , 421-422 (1951); Delta Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 247 F.2d 327, 331-332 (5th Cir. 1957). See also National Labor Relations Board v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 254 F.2d 905, 914-915 , 78 A.L.R.2d 1135 (8th Cir. 1958), and cases cited therein. Cf. Law v. National Labor Relations Board, 192 F,2d 236 (10th Cir. 1951); Montgomery Ward & Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished71 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1934
In reaching our conclusion, we have examined the cases of Hill v. Commissioner (C. C. A. 4) 66 F.(2d) 45 ; Commissioner v. Brown (C. C. A. 7) 69 F.(2id) 602, decided March 22, 1984; Robinson v. Commissioner (C. C. … As to those after 1926, the Board having decided such payments were in the peculiar facts shown capital transactions, the court sustained the Board on the ground there was substantial evidence on which the Board’s decision
Cited 29 timesPublishedAndrew Hofer v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission
581 F.2d 975 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 1978
In Richardson v. … . § 1981 , and the Fifth Amendment (emphasis added),” this court held, citing Brown v.
Cited 31 timesPublished23 F.2d 765 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1927
On appeal, the decision of the board was affirmed. … Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612; Kirby v. Clements, 44 App. D. C. 12; Brown v. Tomlinson, 49 App. D. C. 310, 265 F. 460 ; Scott v. Longtin, 52 App. D. C. 102, 281 F. 606 ; In re Levy, 55 App. D.
Cited 2 timesPublished315 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1963
Brown, as Members of the National Labor Relations Board, Appellees. No. 16868. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 15, 1962. … Union v. Brown, 9 Cir., 284 F.2d 619 (1960). cert. denied, 366 U.S. 934 , 81 S.Ct. 1659 , 6 L.Ed.2d 846 (1961); Atlas Life Insurance Company v. Leedom, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 97 , 284 F.2d 231 (1960); Leedom v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna