Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
0.88s
661 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 1987
State of New York v. Shore Realty Corporation, 759 F.2d 1032, 1044 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Cauffman, *1061 21 ERC 2167 (1984); United States v. Wade, 577 F.Supp. 1326, 1333 (E.D.Pa. 1983). … Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Company v. United States, 250 U.S. 123, 125 , 39 S.Ct. 407, 408 , 63 L.Ed. 889 (1919). See also, Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1487, 1491 (9th Cir.1983); United States v.
Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Stringfellow, 911 F.2d 225 (1990)Cited 46 timesPublishedJonathan Club v. City of Los Angeles
680 F. Supp. 1405 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 1988
In Mobil Oil Corp. v. … Agricultural Labor Relations Board, 805 F.2d 1353, 1355 (9th Cir.1986), an injunction was sought to enjoin proceedings before a state administrative law judge for the Agricultural Labor Relations Board.
Cited 3 timesPublished6 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 1933
Since plaintiff thus sought to restrain the execution of an order of an administrative board acting under the statutes of the state, the application for interlocutory injunction was heard by three judges. 28 USCA § 380. … The same jurisdictional question is decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit in Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Railroad Commission, 47 F.(2d) 8 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedStoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.
513 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 1981
The workmen’s compensation benefits were paid pursuant to the direction of the Texas Industrial Accident Board. … In his order certifying the class, however, Judge Stephens stated that the government had supplied the court with a list of all those on board the plane, that 24 civilian and military personnel were on board the plane, that
Cited 34 timesPublished298 F.R.D. 460 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2014
Thiel College, 296 F.3d 184, 191 (3d Cir.2002)); Brown v. … (citing Brown v. Fifth Third Bank, 730 F.3d 698, 699 (7th Cir.2013)); Brown v. Recktenwald, No. 13-2028, 550 Fed. Appx. 96 , 97 n. 2, 2013 WL 6439653 , *2 n. 2 (3d Cir.
Cited 69 timesPublishedMirzai v. Kolbe Foods, Inc. (In Re Mirzai)
271 B.R. 647 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2001
See id. at 846-847 ; see also Williams v. … was again relieved of suspension by the Franchise Tax Board on December 13, 2000.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCurtiss-Wright Flow Control Corp. v. Z & J Technologies GmbH
563 F. Supp. 2d 1109 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 2007
See Nystrom v. TREX Co., 424 F.3d 1136 , 1144 (Fed.Cir.2005) (consistency of language in specification is acceptable basis for claim construction). Nystrom concerned a patent on boards used for outdoor decking. … The issue in Nystrom was whether the term “board” was limited to conventional wooden boards cut from a log. Id. at 1142.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMarilyn Gladle v. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2020
Brown, Ms. Weldon, or Mr. Love. Sec. SUF No. 81. … See e.g., Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 (1976): Vinieratos v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 939 F.2d 762, 773-75 (9th Cir. 1991).
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States of America v. California Institute of Technology
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 28, 2019
Brown v. Celgene Corp., No. 2:10- cv-3165-GHK-SS, 2014 WL 3605896, at *2 (C_D. Cal. July 10, 2014) (emphasis added). … Stolper served as Chair of both the JCAP 1 Board of Directors and the JCAP 2 Governance Board. Compl. 4 9.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNorthland Casualty Co. v. Wescal Yachts, Inc.
60 F. Supp. 2d 1027 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 13, 1999
See Newman v. Universal Pictures, 813 F.2d 1519, 1521-22 (9th Cir.1987). … See North Star Int’l v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, 720 F.2d 578, 581 (9th Cir.1983).
Cited 1 timesPublished278 F. Supp. 3d 1146 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2017
Chamness v. … See Munro v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJ.C. ex rel. R.C. v. Beverly Hills Unified School District
711 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 2010
In support of her argument, Plaintiff cites the Second Circuit case Thomas v. Board of Educ., 607 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir.1979). … Plaintiff also cites Porter v. Parish School Board, 393 F.3d 608 (5th Cir.2004), in support of her position.
Cited 12 timesPublishedVanya S. P. v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2026
Brown-Hunter, 806 20 F.3d at 489. … .”); Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 2021 28 WL 4078015, at *17 (E.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRalphs Grocery Co. v. Meat Cutters Union Local No. 421
360 F. Supp. 548 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 1973
As so succinctly stated in Direct Transit Lines v. … Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2022
Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (internal citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDORNES BY AND THROUGH LOPEZ v. Lindsey
18 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 1998
On May 25, 1996, the district’s Board of Education accepted the recommendation of the hearing panel and expelled plaintiff. … Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Org., 441 U.S. 600, 617 , 99 S.Ct. 1905 , 60 L.Ed.2d 508 (1979). V.
Cited 2 timesPublished316 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 15, 1968
The Board of Inquiry voted to deny plaintiff admission but the ruling of the Board was reversed on appeal and plaintiff was admitted to the United States. The record of proceedings had April 22-26, 1932 [Defts.’ Ex. … Lew Moon Cheung v. Rogers, 272 F.2d 354, 362-363 (9 C.A.1959); and Lee Hong Lung v. Dulles, 261 F.2d 719, 724 (9 C.A. 1958).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2021
Starr v. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan 23 Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAm. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker
758 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 1991
It traces the historical duties of the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, and the FSLIC. … The bank was subsequently closed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and FSLIC filed suit in its capacity as receiver.
Cited 30 timesPublishedCareau Group v. United Farm Workers of America
716 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 1989
Wirtz v. Tyson’s Poultry, Inc., 355 F.2d 255 (8th Cir.1966); Sweetlake Land & Oil Co. v. NLRB, 334 F.2d 220 (5th Cir.1964). … V. ANALYSIS In general, courts have ruled that summary judgment is an inappropriate vehicle for raising a question concerning the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. O’Donnell v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna