Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

0.88s

  • United States v. Stringfellow

    661 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 1987

    State of New York v. Shore Realty Corporation, 759 F.2d 1032, 1044 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Cauffman, *1061 21 ERC 2167 (1984); United States v. Wade, 577 F.Supp. 1326, 1333 (E.D.Pa. 1983). … Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Company v. United States, 250 U.S. 123, 125 , 39 S.Ct. 407, 408 , 63 L.Ed. 889 (1919). See also, Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1487, 1491 (9th Cir.1983); United States v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Stringfellow, 911 F.2d 225 (1990)Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Jonathan Club v. City of Los Angeles

    680 F. Supp. 1405 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 1988

    In Mobil Oil Corp. v. … Agricultural Labor Relations Board, 805 F.2d 1353, 1355 (9th Cir.1986), an injunction was sought to enjoin proceedings before a state administrative law judge for the Agricultural Labor Relations Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Betts v. Railroad Commission

    6 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 1933

    Since plaintiff thus sought to restrain the execution of an order of an administrative board acting under the statutes of the state, the application for interlocutory injunction was heard by three judges. 28 USCA § 380. … The same jurisdictional question is decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit in Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Railroad Commission, 47 F.(2d) 8 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.

    513 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 1981

    The workmen’s compensation benefits were paid pursuant to the direction of the Texas Industrial Accident Board. … In his order certifying the class, however, Judge Stephens stated that the government had supplied the court with a list of all those on board the plane, that 24 civilian and military personnel were on board the plane, that

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Sanchez v. Rodriguez

    298 F.R.D. 460 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2014

    Thiel College, 296 F.3d 184, 191 (3d Cir.2002)); Brown v. … (citing Brown v. Fifth Third Bank, 730 F.3d 698, 699 (7th Cir.2013)); Brown v. Recktenwald, No. 13-2028, 550 Fed. Appx. 96 , 97 n. 2, 2013 WL 6439653 , *2 n. 2 (3d Cir.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Mirzai v. Kolbe Foods, Inc. (In Re Mirzai)

    271 B.R. 647 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2001

    See id. at 846-847 ; see also Williams v. … was again relieved of suspension by the Franchise Tax Board on December 13, 2000.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corp. v. Z & J Technologies GmbH

    563 F. Supp. 2d 1109 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 2007

    See Nystrom v. TREX Co., 424 F.3d 1136 , 1144 (Fed.Cir.2005) (consistency of language in specification is acceptable basis for claim construction). Nystrom concerned a patent on boards used for outdoor decking. … The issue in Nystrom was whether the term “board” was limited to conventional wooden boards cut from a log. Id. at 1142.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marilyn Gladle v. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2020

    Brown, Ms. Weldon, or Mr. Love. Sec. SUF No. 81. … See e.g., Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 (1976): Vinieratos v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 939 F.2d 762, 773-75 (9th Cir. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States of America v. California Institute of Technology

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 28, 2019

    Brown v. Celgene Corp., No. 2:10- cv-3165-GHK-SS, 2014 WL 3605896, at *2 (C_D. Cal. July 10, 2014) (emphasis added). … Stolper served as Chair of both the JCAP 1 Board of Directors and the JCAP 2 Governance Board. Compl. 4 9.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Northland Casualty Co. v. Wescal Yachts, Inc.

    60 F. Supp. 2d 1027 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 13, 1999

    See Newman v. Universal Pictures, 813 F.2d 1519, 1521-22 (9th Cir.1987). … See North Star Int’l v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, 720 F.2d 578, 581 (9th Cir.1983).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • De La Fuente v. State

    278 F. Supp. 3d 1146 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2017

    Chamness v. … See Munro v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • J.C. ex rel. R.C. v. Beverly Hills Unified School District

    711 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 2010

    In support of her argument, Plaintiff cites the Second Circuit case Thomas v. Board of Educ., 607 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir.1979). … Plaintiff also cites Porter v. Parish School Board, 393 F.3d 608 (5th Cir.2004), in support of her position.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Vanya S. P. v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2026

    Brown-Hunter, 806 20 F.3d at 489. … .”); Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 2021 28 WL 4078015, at *17 (E.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Meat Cutters Union Local No. 421

    360 F. Supp. 548 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 1973

    As so succinctly stated in Direct Transit Lines v. … Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sandra Perez v. Andrew Saul

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2022

    Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (internal citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DORNES BY AND THROUGH LOPEZ v. Lindsey

    18 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 1998

    On May 25, 1996, the district’s Board of Education accepted the recommendation of the hearing panel and expelled plaintiff. … Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Org., 441 U.S. 600, 617 , 99 S.Ct. 1905 , 60 L.Ed.2d 508 (1979). V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lim v. Clark

    316 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 15, 1968

    The Board of Inquiry voted to deny plaintiff admission but the ruling of the Board was reversed on appeal and plaintiff was admitted to the United States. The record of proceedings had April 22-26, 1932 [Defts.’ Ex. … Lew Moon Cheung v. Rogers, 272 F.2d 354, 362-363 (9 C.A.1959); and Lee Hong Lung v. Dulles, 261 F.2d 719, 724 (9 C.A. 1958).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • John Cephas Young v. Levert

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2021

    Starr v. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan 23 Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker

    758 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 1991

    It traces the historical duties of the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, and the FSLIC. … The bank was subsequently closed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and FSLIC filed suit in its capacity as receiver.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Careau Group v. United Farm Workers of America

    716 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 1989

    Wirtz v. Tyson’s Poultry, Inc., 355 F.2d 255 (8th Cir.1966); Sweetlake Land & Oil Co. v. NLRB, 334 F.2d 220 (5th Cir.1964). … V. ANALYSIS In general, courts have ruled that summary judgment is an inappropriate vehicle for raising a question concerning the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. O’Donnell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.