Case law

Schackman v. Arnebergh

258 F. Supp. 983 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 1966

Moss v. Hornig, 214 F.Supp. 824 , 330-331 (D.Conn.1962); North American Iron and Steel Co. v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 723, 724 (E.D.N.Y. 1955); Hibben v. … Smith v. California (9 Cir. 1964) 336 F.2d 530, 534 ; Pierre v. Jordan (9 Cir. 1964) 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 ; Blue and. Gold Stamps-U-Save Premium Co. v.

Millan v. MARSHAL

677 F. Supp. 2d 1217 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 28, 2009

On December 6, 2005, a panel of the Board of Parole Hearings (“Board”) conducted a parole suitability hearing for petitioner, and denied petitioner parole for two years, effective April 5, 2006. 1 Lodgment no. 1. … Koerner v. Grigas, 328 F.3d 1039, 1046 (9th Cir.2003) (citation omitted); Davis v. Silva, 511 F.3d 1005, 1009 (9th Cir.2008).

Harper v. United States

314 F. Supp. 360 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 19, 1970

“(V) Plaintiff was never an employee of Graybar, and held no Gray-bar stock after the redemption in 1955. She performed no services for Graybar at any time. … In the case of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. v.

Rodney Lewis v. Moki Doorstep Corp.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 19, 2019

Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992). … Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Keith v. Volpe

960 F. Supp. 1448 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 10, 1997

In Hook v. … V.

Padilla v. AT & T CORP.

697 F. Supp. 2d 1156 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 21, 2009

.”); see also Exxon Mobil Corp. v. … Weil & Brown, Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ. Pro. Before Trial (Rutter 2009), *1158 ¶ 2:206. But even a bad strategy is not necessarily a sham.

In re Syncor Erisa Litigation

229 F.R.D. 636 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 6, 2005

Syncor’s Board of Directors (“Board”) had final decision-making authority regarding all aspects of plan administration. … The Board members included: Monty Fu, Syn-cor’s co-founder and chairman of the Board; Robert Funari, Syncor’s chief executive officer, president, and Board member; George Oki; Benard Puckett; Ronald Williams; Steven Gerber

Arno Kuigoua v. Loretta Melby, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 8, 2026

See, e.g., Alexander v. Brown, 2025 WL 2678426, 28 at *7 (C.D. Cal. … See 11 Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 465 U.S. at 102-06; Coal. to Defend 12 Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133-34 (9th Cir. 2012).

UNITED ALLOYS, INC. v. Baker

797 F. Supp. 2d 974 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 22, 2011

See Wickland Oil Terminals v. … See Vill. of Milford v.

Goodson-Todman Enterprises, Ltd. v. Kellogg Company

358 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 1973

Judge Browning wrote: “The critical distinction between ‘idea’ and ‘expression’ is difficult to draw. ... … As Judge Browning observed in Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry *1248 Corp. v.

Rubio v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.

572 F. Supp. 2d 1157 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 2008

Pt. 226 (“Regulation Z”) promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board (“Board”) pursuant to statutory authority. … In light of Congress’ explicit delegation of authority to the Board, courts must defer bróadly to the Board’s interpretation of the' statute and its own regulations. See Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Aziz v. AIR INDIA LTD.

658 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 1, 2009

See Fulop v. … In Twardowski v.

Dunn v. Gaiam, Inc.

166 F. Supp. 2d 1273 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 7, 2001

The FAC also substitutes five new named Defendants for what had previously been Does 1 to 5: GAIAM INTERNATIONAL ("Gaiam Int’l”), LYNN POWERS ("Powers”), WILLIAM BROWN ("Brown”), FIROZ JIM-AL ("Jimal”), and JANE PEMBERTON … See, e.g., Prize Frize, Inc. v. Matrix (U.S.)

Jeglin Ex Rel. Jeglin v. San Jacinto Unified School District

827 F. Supp. 1459 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 28, 1993

This case calls for the Court to decide whether portions of a dress code imposed by a school board and its agents violates the First Amendment rights of the students affected. … The teachings of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969) and Karp v.

Williams v. Canon, Inc.

432 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 26, 1977

Takeshi Mitarai is chairman of the board of Canon, chairman of the board of Canon U.S.A. and a director of CBM. … Gilson v.

Ward v. News Group International, Ltd.

733 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 22, 1990

The allegedly defamatory statements were made by the defendants NEWS GROUP, BROWN, and HARMER who are parties to the controversy. … The republication by GLOBE and RIGBY accurately restated the statements from the NEWS GROUP, BROWN, and HARMER.

Varjabedian v. Emulex Corp.

152 F. Supp. 3d 1226 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 13, 2016

on the Board and demanding “wholesale change at the Board level”,. … pursue Board change.

Adams Insulation Co. v. Orange County District Council of Carpenters

541 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 29, 1982

Section 158 (e); Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra. 8. … Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra. 9.

Stoller v. Tennant

448 F. Supp. 712 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 1978

In Lupo v. … See, Dye v. United States Parole Commission, 558 F.2d 1376 (10th Cir. 1977).

AMERICAN ASS'N OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES v. Shelley

324 F. Supp. 2d 1120 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 6, 2004

See Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 365-68 , 121 S.Ct. 955, 963-64 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001). Defendant’s decisions were based on the following findings: 1. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974).