Case law

Philip Lawrence v. Patrizio Moi

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 24, 2021

Shane v. … v.

Jorge Alejandro Acosta-Quiroz v. Los Angeles County

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2022

or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party and includes support staff. 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, board … See Kamakana v.

Snow Joe, LLC v. Linemart Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 2022

Stone v. … See Plummer v. Chem. Bank, 668 F.2d 654, 659 (2d Cir. 1982) (holding that provisions of a 27 settlement operate as an injunction); see also Buckhannon Board & Care Home v. W. Va.

Ratliff v. Hedgepeth

712 F. Supp. 2d 1038 · District Court, C.D. California · May 4, 2010

Rich v. … Agurs, 427 U.S. at 103 , 96 S.Ct. at 2397 (footnotes omitted); Hayes v. Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 978 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc); see also Giglio v.

O'CONNOR v. Boeing North American, Inc.

92 F. Supp. 2d 1026 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 2000

See Carey v. … See Cook v.

Xsolla (USA), Inc. v. Aghanim Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2024

See 28 Ashcroft v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Adidas Int., 938 F. Supp. 23 628, 634 (S.D.

Brian Bagwell v. CBS Broadcasting Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 25, 2019

coordination, i.e., the ‘nerve center,’ and not simply an office where the corporation holds its board meetings.” Id. at 93. … Audette v.

Lisa Marie Vergowven v. Social Security Administration

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2019

Smolen v. … Barnhart, 278 F.3d 947, 958 (9th Cir. 2002); Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 9 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015).

Jerald Friedman v. AARP Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2019

Ashcroft v. 17 Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. … See 21 Clayworth v.

Karl Augustus v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2022

affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on 15 behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 16 2.12 Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 17 boards … See Kamakana v.

Bilal Muhammad v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2024

See Kamakana v. City and County of 28 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … See Pintos 12 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010).

Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. v. TCT Mobile (US) Inc. and TCT Mobile Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 19, 2023

Following proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, WPI filed a motion to lift the stay (Doc. No. 1 U.S. Patent Nos. 6,381,211; 8,274,991; 8,565,256; and 9,125,051. 2 Pl.’s Compl., Doc. … V.

Ron Sarfaty v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2020

See Rosebrock v. … Council 4) of the Blind v. Paulson, 525 F.3d 1256, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 2008); see also >| Disabled in Action v. Board of Elections in the City of New York, 752 F.3d 2?

In re Debtor L. Scott Apparel, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 13, 2020

Debtor did not hold board or 13 shareholder meetings on an annual basis. … Smith v. Clark Cty. Sch.

Jane D.M. Doe v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2022

Doe v. … See Kamakana v.

Dana Tompkins Barnett v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 4, 2021

Sprewell v. … Wishum v. Brown, No. 14-cv-01491-WHO, 2015 WL 1408095, at *2 17 (N.D. Cal.

Jacque McDaniel v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 2019

Massachi v. … Kapitanski, a Board Certified Psychiatrist, issued a summary report 1 of her complete psychiatric evaluation of plaintiff. [AR at 465-69.]

Ashley Blackmon v. City of Beverly Hills

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 11, 2022

See Pintos v. … See Kamakana v.

Jimmie Carter v. J. Castelo

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2020

Frost v. … Jan. 14, 2019) (“To state a colorable constitutional violation, slippery 5 floors normally must be alleged in conjunction with some other exacerbating 6 condition.”); Brown v.

Gilbert Salazar v. M.E. Spearman

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2020

Frost v. … Jan. 14, 2019) (“To state a colorable constitutional violation, slippery 5 floors normally must be alleged in conjunction with some other exacerbating 6 condition.”); Brown v.