Case law

Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership v. City of Los Angeles, California

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 24, 2021

Defendant offers no legal authority to 1 establish that only voice, text messaging, and email services qualify as “personal 2 wireless services” or “commercial mobile services” under § 332(c)(7), or that the 3 TCA … A remand would also conflict with 9 Congress’s clearly stated intent that effective prohibition claims be heard and decided 10 on an expedited basis.

Orange County Coastkeeper v. Griswold Industries

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 27, 2024

Investigate and document the ultimate receiving waters for stormwate1 22 discharges from all portions of the Facility, and clearly incorporate Cla- 23 Val’s findings into the Facility … During the Term of this Consent Decree and thereafter in 24 compliance with the Storm Water Permit, Cla-Val shall collect samples 25 from at least four (4) Qualifying Storm Events

Paul Andrew Rentsch v. Andrew M. Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2023

Barnhart, 400 F.3d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted). 22 || The Commissioner has the burden of proof at step five — i.e., establishing that the 23 || claimant could perform other work in the national economy. … An ALJ must clearly identify each subjective 22 statement being rejected and the particular evidence in the record which 23 purportedly undermines the statement.

Pro Water Solutions, Inc. v. Angies List, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 21, 2021

Agreements are between Angie’s List and 12 Pro Water (not between Angie’s List and customers), any term in an Advertising 13 Agreement limiting what Angie’s List could do with customer information would need 14 to be clearly … Pro Water does 14 not dispute this legal principle and instead argues that the advertising services Angie’s 15 List provides qualify as a “good” under the IUCC.

John L. Miller v. Daniel Sanchez

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 3, 2020

is required to 23 dismiss the case at any time if it concludes the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to 24 state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a 25 defendant who is immune … Cry, 584 F.3d 14 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009), and a prisoner’s “right of meaningful access to the courts 15 extends to established prison grievance procedures.” Bradley v.

Abira Medical Laboratories v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 2025

Particularly given the sheer volume of Insureds Defendant Anthem 5 serves, the Court concludes that the case was not clearly removable from initial 6 pleadings, such that Section 1446(b)(3) applies. … “Medicare 17 coverage determinations by MAOs are made pursuant to criteria established by the 18 CMS.” Id.

Darnelle Cheri Mason v. Andrew M. Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 28, 2021

The 2 || Commissioner has the burden of proof at step five — i.e., establishing that the 3 || clarmant could perform other work in the national economy. Id. … An ALJ must clearly identify each subjective 19 || statement being rejected and the particular evidence in the record which 20 || purportedly undermines the statement.

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2020

, and plaintiff's established place in the market.” … Hyperkin asserts that “an award of attorneys’ fees is appropriate” because Atari Interactive’s “claims are deceptive and untenable, qualifying as an “exceptional case’ under the Lanham Act.” Mot. at 21.

Casa Libre Freedom House v. Alejandro Mayorkas

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 2023

The purpose of the SIJ classification is to 14 help alleviate “hardships experienced by some dependents of United States juvenile 15 courts by providing qualified aliens with the opportunity to apply for special … The statutory deadline is clearly drafted and 6 there is no suggestion or implication of any exceptions.

Long Beach Unified School District v. Santa Catalina Island Company

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 27, 2023

Id. at 19 322 (“Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and 20 upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an 21 … nuisance was not caused by 6 any of their actions or failure to act; and (2) that they did not act negligently or unreasonably. 7 Separately, Defendants argue that the nuisance is not abatable, and therefore does not qualify

United States v. Donn

584 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 1982

These allegations are not clearly — ” “ — not clearly without merit.” There is that double negative business that a lot of courts use when they can’t figure out how to decide a case. … COHEN, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting official court reporter for the United States District Court, Central District of California.

Lisa Van Marocco v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 23, 2022

Barnhart, 400 F.3d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted). 16 || The Commissioner has the burden of proof at step five — i.e., establishing that the 17 || claimant could perform other work in the national economy. … An ALJ must clearly identify each subjective 10 || statement being rejected and the particular evidence in the record which 11 || purportedly undermines the statement.

Jacobson v. Schwarzenegger

650 F. Supp. 2d 1032 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 2009

. *1044 Summary judgment is appropriate when the nonmoving party “fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of … Neither party disputes the existence of adverse action; plainly, plaintiffs removal from the attorney appointment list qualifies as an adverse action.

Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Hughes Brothers Aircrafters, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2022

Within ninety (90) calendar days of the Dismissal Date, all forklifts 10 operating outside of the Facility’s designated industrial areas shall be clearly marked 11 “OUTSIDE USE” and equipped with low zinc tires, such … Hughes shall collect and analyze storm water samples from at least four (4) 15 Qualifying Storm Events (“QSEs” as defined in the Industrial General Permit) during 16 each Reporting Year per General Permit section XI.B

Rhonda Evelyn Gonzalez v. Andrew M. Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 3, 2021

Davidson, M.D., prepared a qualified medical 10 evaluator’s (“QME”) report for Plaintiff’s workers’ compensation case. AR 1249. 11 Plaintiff told Dr. … Thus, the ALJ implicitly found that the time 28 required for Plaintiff’s bathroom breaks would not exceed the work-preclusive 1 limits established by the VE’s testimony.

D.D., a minor v. Garvey School District

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2021

Student qualified under the 8 IDEA for special education and related services under the primary eligibility of 9 intellectual disability, with a secondary eligibility of autism. (AR 222.) … ‘clearly result in the denial of a [FAPE].’” Timothy O., 27 822 F.3d at 1118 (quoting Amanda J., 267 F.3d at 892).

Tasche Estrada v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California · May 20, 2020

The ALJ was not qualified to draw such a conclusion from these sparse references in 5] the voluminous medical record. … Berryhill, 880 F.3d 1041, 1044 (9th Cir. 2017) (reversal with a directive for the immediate 3] calculation of benefits is a “rare and prophylactic exception to the well-established

Moses Choi v. 8th Bridge Capital, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 25, 2020

“The intention of the parties to extinguish the prior obligation and to substitute a new agreement in its place must clearly appear.” Hunt v. Smyth, 25 Cal. App. 3d 807, 818 (1972). … “Only after that lability is established is it appropriate to evaluate defensive setoffs.” Id.

Robert Jack Zeller v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 2020

The opinion of “other sources” cannot establish the existence 27 of a medically determinable impairment. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1513(a), … linens 28 and clothes used by employees of logging, construction, mining, or other 1 camp, or washes uniforms, aprons, and towels in establishments

Sara Muncy v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 23, 2022

The 2 || Commissioner has the burden of proof at step five — i.e., establishing that the 3 || clarmant could perform other work in the national economy. Id. 4 B. … An ALJ must clearly identify each subjective 22 || statement being rejected and the particular evidence in the record which 23 |} SMa 74 “Social Security Rulings reflect the Social Security Administration’s (“