Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
2.56s
Estate of Rosendo Olivio v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 21, 2023
party or are affiliated with a law firm that has 17 appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 18 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 19 boards … See Kamakana v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSean Sullivan v. Ashley Furniture Industries, LLC.
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 13, 2022
Celotex Corp. v. … I am not an officer or member of the board of directors of AFI or Stoneledge.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWorld Wide Rush LLC v. City of Los Angeles
605 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2009
See Younger v. … Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v.
Reversed by World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, 606 F.3d 676 (2010)Cited 4 timesPublishedMireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
845 F. Supp. 2d 1034 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2012
The decree purportedly states that various federal agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC, and the Office of Thrift Supervision, found that Wells Fargo had engaged in “unsafe or … See Daro v.
Cited 118 timesPublishedGary Gibson v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 2021
Such confidential and 9 proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential 10 submissions to the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) regarding strategies 11 for onboard diagnostics … See Kamakana v. City and 13 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors 14 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRosalinda Higdon v. Andrew Saul
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 26, 2021
Laborin v. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 10 2015) (as amended) (citing Lingenfelter, 504 F.3d at 1036); 11 Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Feb 16, 2021
White v. … An advancement of Petitioner’s parole review date provides only “a ticket to get in 1 the door of the parole board” and “will in no way guarantee parole or necessarily shorten 2 [his] prison sentence[] by a single day.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownSteven Walpert v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 2021
Action: Steven Walpert v. City of Los Angeles, et al. … See Kamakana v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJarron Edmond v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 15, 2021
Stevenson, Crtm. 580, 5th 13 v. … See Kamakana v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownArutyun Darakchyan v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 2026
Plaintiff argues that he exhibited the allegedly damaged window by submitting photos of the broken window, photos of the boarded-up window, photos of text messages demonstrating the cost of window replacement, and the … Cline v. Yamaga, 97 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownStacy Lee Hernandez v. Nancy Berryhill
District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2020
Trevizo v. … Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 5 2008) (citation omitted); see Brown-Hunter v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Aug 3, 2020
Keates v. … A plaintiff cannot file a lawsuit until the written claim has been acted 26 upon, or deemed rejected, by the board of the public entity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTimothy Murphy v. Viad Corporation
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 1, 2021
See Beydoun v. … He is currently 3 See, e.g., Lanier v. American Board of Endodontics, 843 F.2d 901, 911 (6th Cir. 1988). disabled. (Id. Page ID.89.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownJesus Guillermo Martinez v. Neil McDowell
District Court, C.D. California · May 28, 2020
Jackson, 443 U.S. at 326; McDaniel v. Brown, 11 558 U.S. 120, 133 (2010). … (People v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRobyn Lynn Felmley v. Nancy A. Berryhill
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 2020
Reddick v. … See Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 495 (9th Cir. 2015) (remanding for 5 an award of benefits is appropriate in rare circumstances).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · May 20, 2020
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 25 2015) (as amended) (citing Lingenfelter, 504 F.3d at 1036); 26 Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. … Orteza v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2025
See Kagan v. … Browning v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 549 F. Supp. 3d 996, 1004 (N_D. Cal. 2021). In these circumstances, incorporation-by-reference is inappropriate.
Cited 0 timesUnknown162 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2001
Kidron v. … See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316-17 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). As the court noted in Agnew v.
Cited 84 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 2019
See Kamakana v. City 13 and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. 14 Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 27 2010).
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Wholesale Fireworks Corporation
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 2024
Picot v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna