Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

0.68s

  • Nicholas Green v. Board of Regents of the University of California

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 2022

    See Kamakana v. City and FI 13 || County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Z 14 || Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … DEFINITIONS ay dl 2.1 Action: Nicholas Green v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re McDermott

    298 F. Supp. 2d 905 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 13, 2003

    Automotive Products, Inc. v. … Miller v. California Pacific Medical Center, 19 F.3d 449, 461 (9th Cir.1994) (“[i]f the Board demonstrates that it is likely to prevail on the merits, we presume irreparable injury.”); see also United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Frances Fisher v. Screen Actors Guild American Federation of Television and Radio Artists

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2022

    Trustee; and Brown served as a Union-appointed Health Plan Trustee and as a member of the SAG-AFTRA National Board. Id. 4] 30-38. … Powell and Brown represented the Union and membership in voting as National Board members to approve the 2019 Commercials, 2019 Netflix and 2020 TV/Theatrical CBAs. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chad Industries, Inc. v. Automation Tooling System, Inc.

    938 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 1996

    Because Markman v. … Markman v. Westview, supra, 52 F.3d at 983 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Masters v. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    996 F. Supp. 2d 872 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2014

    Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 , 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008); Am. Trucking Ass’ns v. … But just because a particular analysis was worth considering by the board does not mean that it is material to a reasonable investor. See Wayne Cnty. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co.

    208 F.R.D. 617 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 19, 2002

    See, e.g., Hickman v. … For instance, in New York Times Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. United States

    911 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 27, 1995

    Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), was another 9-0 decision, and yet, it was obviously a new rule, given that it overruled Plessy v. … Brown, 347 U.S. at 494-95 , 74 S.Ct. at 691-92 . Nor was Austin dictated by Halper. Hal-per provided a new framework for determining whether a given sanction constitutes punishment or remediation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Guven Uzun v. Medical Board of California, et al.

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2026

    No. 3 10 MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 11 … Myers v. Bennett L.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Urbino v. Orkin Services of California, Inc.

    882 F. Supp. 2d 1152 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2011

    Opp. at 21 (citing Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 500 , 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 854 (2011); Plows v. Rockwell Collins, Inc., 812 F.Supp.2d 1063, 1069-70 , 2011 WL 3501872, at *5-6 (C.D.Cal.2011)).) … As the PAGA arbitration waiver in the Agreement is sufficient for finding the Agreement unconscionable under Franco v. Athens *1168 Disposal Co. and Brown v.

    Vacated by Urbino v. Orkin Servs. of California, Inc., 726 F.3d 1118 (2013)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. California Air Resources Board

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2025

    X Corp. v. … See Zamani v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sirhan v. Galaza

    76 F. Supp. 3d 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 5, 2015

    v. … See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1208 (9th Cir.2012); Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744-745 (9th Cir.2002); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. California Air Resources Board

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2025

    RANDOLPH, in her official 18 capacity as Chair of the California Air Resources Board, STEVEN S. … See 18 19 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), 20 Phillips v. Gen.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Countrywide Financial Corp. Derivative Litigation

    554 F. Supp. 2d 1044 · District Court, C.D. California · May 14, 2008

    Guttman v. … Desaigoudar v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • United States v. City of Los Angeles

    336 F. Supp. 1014 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 18, 1972

    The City counterclaimed against the State of California, Franchise Tax Board, and requested the Court to order the Government and the State of California, Franchise Tax Board to inter-plead their respective claims. … United States v. Acri, 348 U.S. 211 , 75 S.Ct. 239 , 99 L.Ed. 264 (1955); United States v. Liverpool etc., 348 U.S. 215 , 75 S.Ct. 247 , 99 L.Ed. 268 (1955); United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Hershey

    310 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 18, 1969

    . § 1361 1 for reasons set forth in Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 297 F.Supp. 252 , Dist. of Conn. February 13, 1969, unless the action is barred by § 10(b) (3) of the Act. 50 U.S.C. App. § 460(b) (3). … March 1969) ; Dickens v. United States, 308 F.Supp. 1124 (S.D.Iowa February 1969). But see Carey v. Local Board No. 2, 297 F.Supp. 252 (D.Conn. 1969); Bowen v. Hershey, 410 F.2d 962 (1st Cir.); Foley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Guven Uzun v. Medical Board of California, et al.

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 2026

    10 MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. … See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1406(a); 19 || Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Figueroa v. Gates

    207 F. Supp. 2d 1085 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 11, 2002

    Acosta v. … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Frances Fisher v. Screen Actors Guild American Federation of Television and Radio Artists

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2022

    McGuire, John Carter Brown, and Linda Powell. Dkt. 1. … Powell and Brown voted as Union National Board members to approve the 2019 Commercials, 2019 Netflix and 2020 TV/Theatrical CBAs. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Catalina Cruises, Inc.

    930 F. Supp. 1384 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 1996

    Rainey v. Paquet Cruises, Inc., 709 F.2d 169, 172 (2nd Cir.1983); see also Monteleone v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc., 838 F.2d 63, 65 (2nd Cir.1988). … Smith v. Southern Gulf Marine Co. No. 2, Inc., 791 F.2d 416, 421 (5th Cir.1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Academic Games Leagues of America, Inc.

    831 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 1993

    Comm’n v. … Raley Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.