Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

1.60s

  • James Camper v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 2024

    DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: James Camper v. City of Los Angeles, et al. … See Kamakana v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chaim S. Setareh v. United Airlines, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 21, 2023

    It is alleged that Plaintiff and his family took a four-hour shuttle to Denver to board a flight from Denver to Los Angeles, with a stop in Las Vegas. Id. ¶ 15. … Boschetto v. Hansing, 539 F.3d 1011, 1020 (9th Cir. 2008); see also Harris Rutsky v. & Co. Ins. Servs. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allergan USA, Inc. v. Prescribers Choice, Inc.

    364 F. Supp. 3d 1089 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2019

    Cleary v. News Corp. , 30 F.3d 1255 , 1263 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing Meta-Film Assocs., Inc. v. MCA, Inc. , 586 F.Supp. 1346 , 1362 (C.D. … According to Defendants, their customers comprise a sophisticated group of licensed and board-certified dermatologists, not one of whom would believe that Defendants are operated by the FDA. Id.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Toyota Motor Corp.

    785 F. Supp. 2d 883 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 8, 2011

    Ex. 1 at v; Ex. 2 at v.) … Dupont de Nemours & Co., 431 F.3d 353 , 361 (9th Cir.2005) (quoting Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir.1996)).

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Wallisa v. City of Hesparia

    369 F. Supp. 3d 990 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2019

    See Hope v. … Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kimberly Witham v. Nancy A. Berryhill

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2019

    Brown- 23 Ramos, a vocational expert. Id. at 51-54. On April 7, 2017, the ALJ denied 24 plaintiff’s claim for benefits. … Massachi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ramirez v. Almager

    619 F. Supp. 2d 881 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2008

    Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. at 72 , 112 S.Ct. 475 ; Clark v. Brown, 450 F.3d 898, 904 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1027 , 127 S.Ct. 555 , 166 L.Ed.2d 423 (2006). … Willard v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Porco v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

    682 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2010

    See Silver v. … In Opeta v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Heather Parker v. Lendmark Financial Services, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 16, 2024

    Co. v. … Fritsch v. Swift Transp.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • San Bernardino County v. The Insurance Company of The State of Pennsylvania

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2024

    In 1990, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region issued a Cleanup and Abatement Order directing the County to take certain actions with respect to groundwater contamination allegedly emanating … Since the 1990 abatement order, the Control Board has issued two more abatement orders—one in 2008 and another in 2017—that directed the County to take further actions. Id. 3.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bradley K.B. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 31, 2026

    Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2008) 17 (quoting Thomas v. Barnhart, 278 F.3d 947, 958 (9th Cir. 2002)); see Brown- 18 Hunter v. … Rollins v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Troy Angelo Gonzalez v. R. Johnson

    District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2020

    (People v. … . § 2254(a); McGuire, 16 502 U.S. at 67; see also Brown v. Curry, 451 F. App’x 693 (9th Cir. 2011) 17 (“state law sentencing errors, if any, are not cognizable on habeas review”); 18 Rhoades v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lloyd George Kenney v. J. Carp

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 2, 2019

    See generally Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations v. 27 Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 923 (2011) (for a federal court to exercise personal 28 jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, the defendant must have at least 1 “minimum … Costlow v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Automobile Club v. Mellon Bank (DE) National Ass'n

    299 F. Supp. 2d 1032 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2003

    (See, Auto Club v. … Derwell Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • LaPrece Delamar v. Kilolo Kijakazi

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2020

    H. v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 3104615, at *5 (C.D. Cal. 8 June 21, 2018) (quoting Hoffman v. Berryhill, 2017 WL 3641881, at *4 (S.D. … See Brown-Hunter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • U.S. Legal Support, Inc. v. Michelle Beverly

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 25, 2025

    Steel Corp v. 5 U.S., 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 (Fed Cir. 1984); see also Brown Bag Software v. … See Kamakana v. 11 City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. 12 Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • E.S.S. Entertainment 2000, Inc. v. Rock Star Videos, Inc.

    444 F. Supp. 2d 1012 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 28, 2006

    See Cliffs Notes, Inc. v. … See, e.g., ETW Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Taracy Evan Ward v. Kilolo Kijakazi

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2024

    Andrews v. … Berryhill, 880 F.3d 1041, 1046 (9th Cir. 2017); Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 23] (9th Cir. 2015); Burrell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Holland v. United States

    311 F. Supp. 422 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 1970

    himself and the company was pursuant to an understanding between himself and the President of the company, and he further testified that in order to maintain his status position and appropriate image with the company’s Board … Klein, 25 T.O. 1045, 1052 (1956) ; Schmidlapp v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 96 F.2d 680 (1938) ; Albert L. Sanders, 26 T.C.Memo 87 (1957). See also Revenue Ruling § 57-502. .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gabriel Ralphie Menchaca v. Pfieffer

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 2024

    Board of Prison Terms, 405 F.App’x 263, 264 (9th Cir. 2010.)1 1 To the extent petitioner contends that his FAP is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 2241, he is incorrect. … See Ferguson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.