Case law

DTA Corp. v. J & J Enterprises

715 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 28, 1988

See In re Smith, 714 F.2d at 1134 (Fed.Cir.1983) (citing City of Elizabeth v. … See In re Smith, 714 F.2d at 1135 (citing Robbins, Co. v. Lawrence Mfg.

Lewis v. Los Angeles City Unified School District

429 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 1977

Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484, 496-497 , 94 S.Ct. 2485 , 41 L.Ed.2d 256 (1974); Cleveland Board of Education v. La Fleur and Cohen v. … Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484, 496-497 , 94 S.Ct. 2485 , 41 L.Ed.2d 256 (1974); Cleveland Board of Education v. La Fleur and Cohen v.

Kass v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.

431 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 18, 1977

Kauder v. United Board & Carton Corporation, 199 F.Supp. 420, 423 (S.D.N.Y., 1961). … In Bosche v.

United States v. Cordoba

991 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 1998

The general rule in the Ninth Circuit at that time was set forth in Brown v. … Brown v. Darcy, 783 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir.1986), was decided when admissibility of scientific evidence, was governed by Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923). 3 .

California Teachers Ass'n v. Newport Mesa Unified School District

333 F. Supp. 436 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 1971

Block v. Hirsh, 256 U.S. 135 , 41 S.Ct. 458 , 65 L.Ed. 865 (1921); Marcus Brown Holding Co. Inc. v. Feldman, et al., 256 U.S. 170 , 41 S.Ct. 465 , 65 L.Ed. 877 (1921); Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. … The Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall serve as adviser to the Council.

Alberto-Culver Co. v. Trevive, Inc.

199 F. Supp. 2d 1004 · District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2002

Plaintiff claims that as a result of prior litigation *1006 between the parties before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), see Alberto-Culver Co. v. … ’s mark and the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s decision. 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (d); see also CAE, Inc. v.

J.G. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District, Board of Education

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 2021

Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Ferdik 10 v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992). … See Henderson 11 v.

Nano-Second Technology Co. v. Dynaflex International

944 F. Supp. 2d 855 · District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2013

KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 406 , 127 S.Ct. 1727 , 167 L.Ed.2d 705 (2007) (quoting Graham v. … Telemac Cellular Corp. v.

Rosebrock v. BEITER

788 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, C.D. California · May 26, 2011

Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Transp., 321 F.3d 1217, 1224 (9th Cir.2003). Case law from other district courts supports this conclusion. See Roe v. … The Court finds Brown v. California Department of Transportation, 321 F.3d at 1223-24 , instructive and directly on point.

Popovich v. United States

661 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, C.D. California · May 20, 1987

The holding in an earlier California decision, Heaton v. … U.S. v. Aetna Surety, 338 U.S. 366 , 70 S.Ct. 207 (1949). 5 .

Miller v. Reddin

293 F. Supp. 216 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 1968

Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 441 , 77 S.Ct. 1325, 1327 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). See also Times Film Corp. v. Chicago, 365 U.S. 43, 50 , 81 S.Ct. 391 , 5 L.Ed.2d 403 (1961). … Biddle, 177 F.2d 579 (2d Cir. 1949), cert. den. 339 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 803 , 94 L.Ed. 1363 (1950); Brown v.

United States v. General Dynamics Corp.

644 F. Supp. 1497 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 28, 1986

The Board finds its historical roots in joint directives within DOD, and is now provided for by statute. See, 41 U.S.C. Section 607 . The Supreme Court alluded to the Board’s function in United States v. … The Court notes that the stay will not become fully effective until the Defendant, General Dynamics, reapplies for consideration of this matter by the Board. See, Israel v.

Carter v. Variflex, Inc.

101 F. Supp. 2d 1261 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 15, 2000

See e.g., NCAA v. Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984); FTC v. Indiana Fed’n of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447 , 106 S.Ct. 2009 , 90 L.Ed.2d 445 (1986). … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 344 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) (“It is competition, not competitors, which the Act protects.”).

Wells v. Wise

390 F. Supp. 229 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 1975

See Shelton v. *231 U.S. Board of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 388 F.2d 567 , 574 (1967); Jones v. Johnston, 368 F.Supp. 571 (D.C.D.C.1974). … In Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270 (D.C.

International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

611 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 29, 1984

The Supreme Court recently dealt with this very issue. 2 Franchise Tax Board v. … See Rabinowitz v. Board of Junior College, 507 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir.1974).

Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union, Local 814 v. Salatich

318 F. Supp. 1047 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 1970

In N.L.R.B. v. … , see N.L.R.B. v.

Nicholas Green v. Board of Regents of the University of California

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 2022

See Kamakana v. City and FI 13 || County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Z 14 || Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … DEFINITIONS ay dl 2.1 Action: Nicholas Green v.

Theriault v. United States

395 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 1975

United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 , 73 S.Ct. 528 , 97 L.Ed. 727 (1953); Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Company, 415 U.S. 1 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Theriault v. United States, supra. 5. … v.

S.W. v. Board of Education for Los Angeles Unified School District

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 11, 2022

The School Board does not oppose S.W.’s 23 Motion. 24 III. … Ghazali, 46 F.3d at 53 25 (quoting Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)). The Ninth 26 Circuit has recognized that the first and fourth factors cut in opposite directions. See 27 Yourish v.

Pearson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

659 F. Supp. 2d 1084 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2009

See Long v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. Fixed Pension Plan for Pilots, 994 F.2d 692 (9th Cir.1993) (holding system board had exclusive jurisdiction over ERISA suit brought against pension plan); see also Stephens v. … Air, Inc., 464 F.3d 606 (6th Cir.2006) (holding system board had exclusive jurisdiction over parts of ERISA suit brought against pension plan); Jenisio v. Ozark Airlines, Inc.