Case law

Diondra Williams v. Dumaguindin

District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in 8 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection 9 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 10 produced … If only a portion or portions of the 2 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 3 identifytheprotectedportion(s)(e.g.,bymakingappropriatemarkingsinthemargins). 4 (b) for

Michelle Valladolid v. Memorial Health Services

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 2023

DISCUSSION The parties do not dispute that Defendant qualifies as a “person” within the meaning of § 1442(a)(1) or that Defendant has a colorable defense. … Here Defendant has not established either requirement. B.

Tongfang Global Limited v. Element Television Company, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2021

The parties’ mere designation of 21 Disclosure or Discovery Material as Protected Material does not—without the 22 submission of competent evidence by declaration establishing that the material sought 23 to be filed … this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 15 produced. 16 Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

Daniel Saldana v. Martha Donovan

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 3, 2025

The Ninth Circuit has 21 “previously recognized a number of means of sufficiently establishing the privilege, 22 one of which is the privilege log approach.” Id. … J. 221 (2024) (discussing methods to more efficiently establish that a 25 privilege applies).

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. MediaPointe, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 2023

If only a 19 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 14 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Microsoft Corporation v. MediaPointe, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 2023

If only a 19 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 14 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Michael Ray Bredemier v. Theresa Cisneros

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2025

court of appeal unreasonably applied the clearly established federal law governing his insufficiency of evidence claims. … That was not an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

Gross v. Unumprovident Life Insurance

319 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2004

Performs operations, using variety of *1144 surgical instruments and employing established surgical techniques appropriate for specific procedures ... … But the authority cited above regarding working against a physician’s advice clearly contradicts this position. 5.

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

883 F. Supp. 2d 935 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 3, 2010

Teligence’s summary judgment argues that the promotional number does not qualify as a consumable participation key for two reasons. … Laches must be established by a preponderance of the evidence. Id. at 1045 . 2.

Jamie Peter Swart v. Lyle Forehand

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 2023

(Id.) 3 Within the SAC, plaintiff does not clearly raise any claim. … Additionally, if plaintiff wishes to proceed with 13 this action, then he must clearly and legibly sign his pleading.

Daisy Razo v. McLane/Suneast, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 2025

employment for the McLane Defendants, and expressed her willingness to work at any of the McLane Defendants’ locations in Riverside, Orange, San Bernardino, or Los Angeles Counties, and to work in any position for which she was qualified … In other words, the complaint’s shortcomings, if any, are strictly factual; Plaintiffs clearly may pursue a cause of action for harassment against [the supervisor] under section 12940(j)(3) of the California Government Code

Super Power Supply, Inc. v. Macase Industrial Corp.

94 Daily Journal DAR 4142 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 1994

Had this case gone to trial, and had plaintiff prevailed, Super Power’s lost sales could easily have been established by reference to defendant’s books. … WEINSTOCK [associate counsel to Super Power in Georgia] BECAUSE OF THE IMPLICATION WHICH I CLEARLY WAS TRYING TO DRAW THAT THE COURT WAS NOT AWARE OF THE CALIFORNIA COURT’S ORDER. THE COURT: I’M NOT. MR.

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

577 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2008

The Court is not convinced that the fact that the Ports rest on sovereign tidelands renders them immune from preemption under the FAAA. … The Ninth Circuit has held that state action qualifies as proprietary in either of two circumstances.

Lorraine De Leonardis v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 2024

Thus, the harm she alleges—the growing past due balance and charges—is not clearly caused by Defendant refusing to inform Plaintiff in October 2023 of why she was ineligible. … Lastly, in order for a plaintiff to have standing to bring a UCL claim, a plaintiff must “(1) establish a loss or deprivation of money or property sufficient to qualify as injury in fact, i.e., economic injury, and (2) show

Anthony Moreno v. V. Hull

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 2020

) but does not immunize them from claims for prospective relief (such as 13 forward-looking injunctive relief). … District civil rights complaint form to use for filing the First Amended 4 Complaint, which the Court encourages Plaintiff to use. 5 If Plaintiff chooses to file a First Amended Complaint, he must clearly

Daniel Medina v. Stila Styles, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 19, 2025

designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as Confidential 24 Material or Highly Confidential Material – Attorney’s Eyes Only does not— 25 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing … prohibition against 18 disclosure, or any other privilege or immunity.

In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation

438 F. Supp. 1303 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 1977

The burden is clearly on counsel to file adequately-documented applications for fees and those who fail to meet that burden do so at their own risk. … One-half of this multiplier represents the Court’s determination as to the risk of the litigation for these counsel, and one-half of the multiplier represents the Court’s evaluation of the nature and qualify of the services

Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.

307 F.R.D. 508 · District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2015

Plaintiff seeks to establish liability “against J.C. … This common evidence, as opposed to advertisement-by-advertisement analysis, may establish liability.

Chemical Producers & Distributors Ass'n v. Helliker

319 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, C.D. California · May 12, 2004

The California scheme, in short, makes it costlier for generic applicants to qualify for registration. Hence, Plaintiff seeks to invalidate it. The “hook” it uses is the doctrine of pre-emption. LEGAL ANALYSIS A. … The limited facts Plaintiff has adduced do not establish that Section 12811.5 has stifled innovation or decreased competition on a large scale.

Jack Leroy Carroll v. Ralph Diaz

District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2022

State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing fegal authority or argument. … State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument.