Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,916 results
1.14s
WSYLAX, LLC v. True Lacrosse, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2022
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 23 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on 7\|a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 8 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in
Cited 0 timesUnknownPryor v. Aerotek Scientific, LLC
278 F.R.D. 516 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 15, 2011
Jan. 17, 2006) (‘“Although there is no explicit requirement concerning the class definition in FRCP 23, courts have held that the class must be adequately defined and clearly ascertainable before a class action may proceed … To be typical, a class member need not prove that she is immune from any possible defense, or that her claim will fail only if every other class member’s claim also fails.
Cited 15 timesPublished635 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 1985
But these opinions will not ordinarily establish constitutional minima. … What experts may consider desirable may well constitute appropriate goals to which the other branches may aspire but they do not usually establish those minimums below which the Constitution establishes a prohibition.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNathan Rocky Glover v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 25, 2022
If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 11 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 23 making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Nat. Broadcasting Co., Inc.
449 F. Supp. 1127 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 26, 1978
effect of the provision would be to establish a controlling standard in the television industry. … The legislative history clearly and expressly establishes that “[i]t [was] not the intent of *1144 the committee to compel a hearing or trial on the public interest issue.”
Cited 15 timesPublishedMichael Lopez v. City of El Monte
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 25, 2022
If only a 16 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 17 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 18 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 28 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8
Cited 0 timesUnknownGospel Missions of America v. Bennett
951 F. Supp. 1429 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 10, 1997
“Prior authorities ... clearly establish that charitable appeals for funds, on the street or door to door, involve a variety of speech interests— communication of information, the dissemination and propagation of views and … Thus, the City's licensing requirements for professional fund-raisers are not immune from First Amendment scrutiny. 16 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedSiobahn Carroll v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2022
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBible Club Ex Rel. R.G. v. Placentia-Yorba Linda School District
573 F. Supp. 2d 1291 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2008
The District’s argument is misplaced; issuing an injunction would not result in the establishment of a limited open forum at EHS. … EHS has already likely established such a forum already by admitting the Red Cross Club among others.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSunil Kumar, Ph. D. v. Dr. Jolene Koester
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2023
If only a portion 7 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 8 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 9 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2022
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 23 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 24 making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownPocketbook Int'l SA v. Domain Admin/SiteTools, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2021
Designations 8 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 9 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose 10 unnecessary expenses and burdens … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 11 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 12 privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEstate of Michael Vasquez v. County of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2024
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9
Cited 0 timesUnknownOne Horn Transportation, Inc. v. Brown United, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 23, 2019
If only a 24 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 |; Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 || markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 || procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 || without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknown836 F. Supp. 2d 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · May 26, 2010
Clearly Haas is no longer of the opinion that, had the examiner been privy to the information revealed on page 8, this would have been sufficient to support a rejection of Plumley’s patent as anticipated and obvious. … By the same token, “the fact that an issue [is] submitted to a jury does not automatically immunize an accused infringer from a finding of willful infringement.” DePuy Spine, Inc. v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMontano v. Bonnie Brae Convalescent Hospital, Inc.
79 F. Supp. 3d 1120 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 7, 2015
“[T]he history of the FHAA[ 4 ] clearly establishes that Congress anticipated that landlords would have to shoulder certain costs involved, so long as they are not unduly burdensome.” California Mobile Home Park Mgmt. … [ ] ... or other social service establishment”); Hubbard v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedViacomCBS Inc. v. Great Divide Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 28, 2022
If only a portion or 25 || portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 27 ||appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a Oo 13 || page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 14 |lidentify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in
Cited 0 timesUnknownZeeshan H. Khan v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 7, 2022
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohn Forrest v. Thahesha Jusino
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2021
The Eighth Circuit determined that the 27 complaint “clearly charged a generic burglary offense” and that the evidence was sufficient to permit the district court to find that the judgment was in fact a 28 conviction … An intervening court decision must “effect a 27 material change in the applicable law” to establish unavailability.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKolon Industries, Inc. v. Hyosung Advanced Materials Corp.
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 26, 2024
Designations 14 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 15 … P. 26, the producing party bears the 13 burden of establishing the privilege or protection of all such challenged documents. 14
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna