Case law

Millenium Inc. v. SW Distribution Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 18, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 8 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 9 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Calandra Smith v. Department of Public Social Services

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 2023

satisfies the California 26 Government Claims Act (“CGCA”) claims presentation requirement for this emotional distress claim, which is questionable at best, because Defendants’ acts as 27 alleged simply do not qualify … If Plaintiff utilizes the Notice of Dismissal, she is instructed to clearly 10 || state whether she is dismissing the entire action or only certain claims or certain 11 || defendants. 12 13 14 || ITIS SO ORDERED.

TIW Holdings LLC v. EVO Brands LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 25, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 8 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without

A62 Equities LLC v. Chohan (In re Chohan)

532 B.R. 130 · District Court, C.D. California · May 28, 2015

INTRODUCTION This is an appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s July 24, 2014 Order Establishing Scope of the Automatic Stay in Connection with Alleged Swap Agreement. (8:14-bk-13606-SC Dkt. 74.) … Thus, the Congressional intent animating § 560 would not be served by allowing an assign-ee such as A62, under the circumstances of this case, to qualify as a “swap participant.”

Ravgen, Inc. v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 23 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 24 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Scott v. Tighe (In Re Buck)

307 B.R. 157 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2004

We The People asserts that the court in In re Kangarloo, 250 B.R. 115 (Bankr.C.D.Cal. 2000) followed Reed , thus establishing a "California view" of section 110(g) that should be followed in this case. … Since the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, and the case law clearly supports the imposition of a fine in this case, the Court will not address the policy arguments in this memorandum.

Business Partner Solutions v. Novacoast, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2024

If only a 20 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, then the 21 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 22 appropriate markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 5 for protection, then the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins or

Dohner v. McCarthy

635 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 1985

But these opinions will not ordinarily establish constitutional minima. … What experts may consider desirable may well constitute appropriate goals to which the other branches may aspire but they do not usually establish those minimums below which the Constitution establishes a prohibition.

Aron Miron v. Dr. Lewis

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2024

A claim may be dismissed as time-barred only when “it appears beyond 12 doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would establish … Here, there is nothing in the FAC to suggest that 2 plaintiff qualifies for any mental incapacity tolling under section 352. 3 Accordingly, assuming plaintiff qualifies for two years of tolling under section 4

WSYLAX, LLC v. True Lacrosse, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 23 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on 7\|a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 8 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in

Nathan Rocky Glover v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 25, 2022

If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 11 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 23 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Carrie Pi v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 13, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 4 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 5 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 (b

Manuel Martinez v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2023

If only a portion 5 || or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 … If only a portion or portions of 20 || the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 21 |jidentify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

Edwin Bazarganfard v. Club 360 LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 2022

for protection 2 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 3 material is disclosed or produced. … 7 are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). 8 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 9 established

Sobhani v. @ RADICAL. MEDIA INC.

257 F. Supp. 2d 1234 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 11, 2003

Defendant as the moving party bears the initial burden of establishing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-24 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2553 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). … Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Posner concluded that section 103(a) should not be read “as qualifying the exclusive right of the owner of a copyright of the original work to make derivative works based on that work

In Re: Ring LLC Privacy Litigation

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 27 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 1 portion, the level of protection being asserted. … If only a portion or portions of the 14 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins 16

Martinez v. Gonzales

504 F. Supp. 2d 887 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2007

The government has failed to meet their burden of proof establishing by clear and convincing evidence that [petitioner] presents a sufficient danger or flight risk.” [Petitioner’s Suppl. Mem., Ex. … Nothing in that statutory language suggests that an alien’s exercise of his right to seek judicial review of an order of removal qualifies as “conspir[ing] or act[ing] to prevent” his removal within the meaning of the statute

Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians' Tribal Council v. City of Palm Springs

347 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 1972

It appears that the prosecution of this action for declaratory relief comes clearly within the powers of the Tribal Council, as provided in its constitution and by-laws, and I so hold. … It is well established that so long as the law of the state in which the land lies permits the incorporation or annexation of federally owned land, no federal consent is necessary. In Surplus Trading Co. v.

Zeeshan H. Khan v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 7, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in

Sunil Kumar, Ph. D. v. Dr. Jolene Koester

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2023

If only a portion 7 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 8 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 9 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).