Case law

Julian Pulido v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2024

If only a 25 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 || Party also must to the extent practical clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 27 || by making appropriate … To the 2 11 || extent practical, if only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for x 12 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 13 || (e.g., by

Calvin Johnson v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2021

If 3 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualify for protection, the 4 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 5 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or 16 portions of the material on a page qualify for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins

Juan Marquez v. Joshua Corrales

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualify for 26 protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 27 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 9 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 10 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 11

NextG Networks of California, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

522 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 20, 2007

Plaintiff informed the County that it qualified as a telephone corporation under California law and must be treated nondiscriminatorily, but the County still required Plaintiff to proceed via the CUP process. (Id.) … In any event, because Congress clearly sought to remove barriers preventing companies from entering the telecommunications market, the Court finds that City of Auburn's rationale applies under the TCA and Plaintiff has suffered

Yasir Anwar v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2024

If only 10 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 11 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 23 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 24 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

United States v. Hudson

3 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 2014

With the Government dangling over $600,000 in front of clearly impoverished individuals, it is no surprise that they took the bait. … Since this Court’s Order Dismissing the Indictment did not enunciate the elements listed in § 3142(h), the Government contends that the Court’s Order does not qualify for the release-order exception under § 3143(c).

Christopher Urquijo v. State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 13 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 14 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 24 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 25 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Tremaine Carroll v. State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2022

a State’s Eleventh Amendment 15 | immunity[.]’” … State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument.

Federal Trade Commission v. Jason Cardiff

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 2019

If only a portion or portions of the material 7 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 8 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9 … This provision is not intended to modify 27 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 28 1 production without

Aurora Rosario v. PIH Health, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 16, 2023

The parties’ mere designation 10 of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the 11 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 12 sought to be filed under … If only a 13 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 14 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 15 markings in the margins

Jasibel Canchola v. Allstate Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 19, 2023

for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before or at the 24 time the material is disclosed or produced. … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 17 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without

Cruz Perez Jr. v. Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 16, 2022

If only a portion of the material 26 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 18 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 19 without prior privilege review.

Ik Soo Jeon v. Martin Frink

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2020

Nonetheless, the Court exercises its discretion to 28 consider the new claim because it is clearly without merit. 1 said at trial is mere speculation. See Dows v. … Petitioner is unable to 15 establish a due process violation from the admission of Dr.

Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. v. Nexus Energy Systems Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the 16 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 17 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 18 … If only a portion or portions 3 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 5

Takeda v. Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.

67 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, C.D. California · May 28, 1999

The Ninth Circuit has held that representation is “adequate” when counsel for the class is qualified and competent, the representative’s interests are not antagonistic to the interests of absent class members, and it is unlikely … defendants, which have been the focus of decisional discussion of the difficulties inherent in certifying transnational classes, are not an issue with respect to the selection of Lead Plaintiffs, since those persons will clearly

Scott v. Tighe (In Re Buck)

307 B.R. 157 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2004

We The People asserts that the court in In re Kangarloo, 250 B.R. 115 (Bankr.C.D.Cal. 2000) followed Reed , thus establishing a "California view" of section 110(g) that should be followed in this case. … Since the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, and the case law clearly supports the imposition of a fine in this case, the Court will not address the policy arguments in this memorandum.

Millenium Inc. v. SW Distribution Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 18, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 8 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 9 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Calandra Smith v. Department of Public Social Services

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 2023

satisfies the California 26 Government Claims Act (“CGCA”) claims presentation requirement for this emotional distress claim, which is questionable at best, because Defendants’ acts as 27 alleged simply do not qualify … If Plaintiff utilizes the Notice of Dismissal, she is instructed to clearly 10 || state whether she is dismissing the entire action or only certain claims or certain 11 || defendants. 12 13 14 || ITIS SO ORDERED.

Adrian Humberto Rios v. City of Azusa

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2022

Except as otherwise provided in 8 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection 9 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or … If only a portion or portions of 2 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 3 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Jorge Alejandro Acosta-Quiroz v. Los Angeles County

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in