Case law

Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation

153 F. Supp. 3d 1148 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 2015

Where, as here, federal court jurisdiction is premised on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1330 , et seq., the Ninth Circuit has held that federal common law choice-of-law rules govern. … In contrast, Spain has enacted laws, as part of its Civil Code, that specifically and clearly govern adverse. possession of movable property.

Nicole Cavicante v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2022

If only a 25 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 26 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 27 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 11 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12

MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 13, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the 26 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Calvin Johnson v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2021

If 3 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualify for protection, the 4 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 5 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or 16 portions of the material on a page qualify for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins

Arthur Lopez v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 2020

with qualified pro bono Appeal was found frivolous. … civil rights complaints This list contains multiple cases against judges, courts, and prosecutors who are immune from suit.

Marksman Partners, L.P. v. Chantal Pharmaceutical Corp.

927 F. Supp. 1297 · District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 1996

Ultimately, the Court can not say that the alleged misstatements of revenues here were clearly of no importance to the average investor. … To immunize the type of conduct alleged here would be to give companies a license to issue groundless appraisals to investors so long as they include a modest footnote or appendix with a kernel of truth that might enable

Noah U. v. Tribune Co. Medical Plan

138 F. Supp. 3d 1134 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2015

The ASA also establishes that in certain circumstances Tribune rather than BCBSIL will review claims.. … The PPO SPD clearly identifies BCBSIL as the Claims Administrator for the PPO Plan and indicates that claims should be submitted to BCBSIL. (Green Deck, Ex. D, at 5, 35-37.)

Steve Landy v. Pettigrew Crewing, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

Like the overtime provision that the Ninth Circuit reviewed in Curtis, the default rules established by § 204 do not, by the statute’s own terms, apply to an employee who is subject to a qualifying CBA. … Cal. 2015) (finding that claims under § 204 existed solely as a result of the CBA because the CBA (1) established time limits for when the employer was required to pay its employees after the pay period ended, and (2) clearly

Fletcher Aircraft Co. v. Bond

77 F.R.D. 47 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 1977

Here, where the plaintiff seeks to divest Air Parts’ right to hold “TC 4A12,” Air Parts is an indispensable party and clearly should be joined if at all possible, because in its absence complete relief cannot be accorded … level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2020

If only a portion or portions of 22 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 24 … If only a portion 5 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 7 the margins).

Erica Mora v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 14 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 20 || whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 21 || production without prior privilege review.

Garcia v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

207 F. Supp. 3d 1114 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 2016

transmitted by—someone with knowledge”); id. at 803(6)(C) (requiring that “making the record was a regular practice”); id. at 803(6)(D) (requiring that “these conditions are shown by the testimony of a custodian or another qualified … (Id. at 5). • “Neither of the initial complaints alleged an amount in controversy exceeding $5 million, nor did they include ‘figures clearly stated’ that could be multiplied to ascertain re-movability.”

Harold C. Lee v. Maranda

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2022

established law.” … Oral 18 threats to file grievances, as opposed to actually filing grievances, are also protected, 19 and that law is clearly established as of 2012, at the latest. See Gleason v.

Juan Marquez v. Joshua Corrales

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualify for 26 protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 27 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 9 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 10 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 11

California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. Flo Services USA

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2024

If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 24 appropriate markings in the … If 6 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 7 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 8 appropriate markings in the margins).

United States v. Hudson

3 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 2014

With the Government dangling over $600,000 in front of clearly impoverished individuals, it is no surprise that they took the bait. … Since this Court’s Order Dismissing the Indictment did not enunciate the elements listed in § 3142(h), the Government contends that the Court’s Order does not qualify for the release-order exception under § 3143(c).

Jasibel Canchola v. Allstate Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 19, 2023

for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before or at the 24 time the material is disclosed or produced. … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 17 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without

Ik Soo Jeon v. Martin Frink

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2020

Nonetheless, the Court exercises its discretion to 28 consider the new claim because it is clearly without merit. 1 said at trial is mere speculation. See Dows v. … Petitioner is unable to 15 establish a due process violation from the admission of Dr.

Adrian Aldaco v. Los Angeles Police Department

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 4, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 25 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 8 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 9 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10

Angelina Atabekova-Michaelidis v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the 11 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 12 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 13 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 28 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate