Case law

Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. v. Kraft

318 F.R.D. 383 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 24, 2016

As stated above, [Kraft and KALP] clearly had notice of a potential claim as shown by their own emails threatening litigation. … Kraft’s motion does not identify any purported error or impropriety that could qualify as inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect on the part of the Court or otherwise.

Ignacio Escalante v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 20, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … If only a portion or portions of 17 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 19

Michele Ghersi v. City of Palm Springs

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 2022

If only a 8 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 9 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 10 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions 20 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 21 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 22 margins

Ramon Mosqueda v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the 17 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 18 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 19 markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Samantha Arredondo v. County of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a pag 1 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protecte 2 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedur 8 || may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without pric 9 || privilege review.

Demajay Williams v. Kohl s Department Stores, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 25, 2019

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 12 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins

Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Di Giorgio v. Lee (In Re Di Giorgio)

96 Daily Journal DAR 13602 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 1996

The Court must assess therefore whether the Di Giorgios’ possession of the premises qualifies as an interest protected by the automatic stay. A. … The Court agrees with CALIF that “none of [these cases] establish this legal principle based on independent legal reasoning.” CALIF, Reply at 5.

Cityscape Rentals, LLC v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 23, 2019

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 7 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 … If only a 17 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 18 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 19 || in the margins). 20

Estate of Abel Chacon v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 3 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4

Top Industrial, Inc. v. Builders Network, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 11 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) ( … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Lang v. Cullen

725 F. Supp. 2d 925 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 23, 2010

Jackman has not established, however, that he is qualified to offer an opinion as to whether trial counsel’s actions constituted ineffective assistance under Strickland v. … I was too upset to think clearly at the time____ But, Mr.

Jorge Perez v. Performance Food Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2019

If only a portion or portions of the material 17 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 … If only a portion or portions 28 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 1 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 2 margins).

Sweet v. Pfizer

232 F.R.D. 360 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 15, 2005

In holding that typicality was not established, the court laid out the differences between commonality and typicality. Id. at 550 . … met the requirements of Rule 23(a)(4): (1) the class representatives must not have interests antagonistic to the unnamed class members and (2) the representatives must be able to prosecute the action “vigorously through qualified

In Re ZZZZ Best Securities Litigation

864 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 1994

There is clearly a disputed issue of fact as to this point. … Both the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit have clearly stated that an alleged failure to act cannot give rise to a Section 10(b) claim unless plaintiffs establish a specific relationship which creates such a duty.

M.W. v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 2023

If only a 12 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 13 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 14 making appropriate markings … If 25 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 26 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 27 by making appropriate markings

Pensmore Reinforcement Technologies, LLC v. Cornerstone Manufacturing and Distribution, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 7 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without

Softvault Systems, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 2019

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and

Burnett v. Raytheon Co. Short Term Disability Basic Benefit Plan

784 F. Supp. 2d 1170 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 2011

Anderson did not provide sufficiently detailed, specific, consistent, and objective mental health information to establish the presence of impairment during that time. (A.R. 296.) 43. On July 1, 2008, Dr. … Burnett is entitled to STD benefits for the maximum 10-week period — from *1185 February 15 through April 25 — because the evidence clearly shpws that Burnett qualified as fully disabled during that time period.

Norvell Fobi v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 15, 2022

If only a portion of the material 18 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 19 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20 A … of privilege or other protection, the obligations of 15 the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). 16 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established