Case law

Antranik Minassian v. City of Montebello

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 19, 2020

If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 6 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 8 margins).

Barbara McHugh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 14, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 20 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 2 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly 3 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.

Barbara McHugh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 21, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 3 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.

Julian Vargas v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 10 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 28 || may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 11 Cace No 2:19

Jamal Mashat v. STV Incorporated

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2023

If only a portion or portions 12 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 13 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 14 the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 16 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 17 production without prior privilege review.

Edward Pena v. International Medical Devices, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in 22 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 23 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 24 the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 7 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 8 privilege review.

Muth v. Sebelius

856 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2012

Notably this treatment did not qualify as being “in connection with” cancer treatment and was subject to the statutory exclusion. Id. … Our plan uses Medicare’s coverage rules to decide what services are medically necessary.”), 3376 (“Services must be provided according to the Medicare coverage guidelines established by the Medicare Program.”), 3397-98 (“

CJ Montano v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions of the material 21 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Garland Connect, LLC v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2021

If only a 3 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 || markings … If only a g 15 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing os 16 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

Hollywood Innovations Group LLC v. Netflix Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2022

If only a portion of the 12 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 14 margins) and … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 27 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins)

Agustin G. Valdez et al. v. Nissan North American, Inc. et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 17, 2025

Courts, including this Court, have found that initial disclosures and CMCS can qualify as the “other paper” in Song-Beverly actions when they set out clearly the amount in controversy. See, e.g., Golik v. Gen. … Thus, the initial disclosures do not establish the amount in controversy for purposes of making removability “unequivocally clear and certain” under section 1446(b)(3).

CJ Montano v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 16, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions of the material 21 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Dr. Andrew Kerr v. Endologix, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 2, 2019

Except as otherwise 23 provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of 24 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be 25 clearly so designated before the … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 7 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8

Nadine Jarrard v. G/O Media, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material 17 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 12 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 13 privilege review.

Textile Secrets International, Inc. v. Ya-Ya Brand Inc.

524 F. Supp. 2d 1184 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2007

And measures should be studied to ensure that systems established to serve these functions are not readily defeated. … Defendants then requested that plaintiff re-designate the individual qualified to testify regarding the creation of the FEATHERS design. (Defendants’ SUF No. 26).

Kareen Anderson v. B.O.P.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2021

A plaintiff can establish an equal protection claim 9 either by showing that he was intentionally discriminated against based on his membership 10 in a protected class, see Lee v. … Oregon Dep't of Agriculture, 553 U.S. 591, 601-02 (2008). 14 Plaintiff has not alleged facts demonstrating that he is a member of a protected class, 15 as holdover inmates do not qualify as a protected class for equal

Milton Quinones v. XPO Logistics, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 24, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in 21 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 22 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 23 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 16 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 17 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Cynthia Romano v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 18 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 19 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify 25 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 26 production without prior privilege review.

Standing Committee on Discipline v. Yagman

856 F. Supp. 1384 · District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 1994

Standard of Proof This Panel has located no precedent establishing the standard of proof to be applied in attorney discipline proceedings in this district. … State Bar, 43 Cal.3d 713, 725 , 239 Cal.Rptr. 68 , 739 P.2d 1236 . (1987), yet the Local Rules do not clearly compel adherence to the state standard of proof, see Local Rules 2.5.1 and 2.5.2.

Carlos Torres v. City of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 2, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 28 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 6 Case No. 5:21-CV-00454 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 12 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 13 making appropriate markings in the margins).