Case law

Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. Rigo Trading, S.A.

District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the 11 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 12 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 13 … Party’s Own Information. 22 The restrictions on the use of Protected Material established by this Order

Salvador Correa v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 27, 2024

The parties’ mere designation 18 of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the 19 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 20 sought to be filed under … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 4 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 5 privilege review.

Switchmusic.com, Inc. v. U.S. Music Corp.

416 F. Supp. 2d 812 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2006

The admissions have been conclusively established since September 6, 2005. … In the present case, it is difficult to qualify the distinctiveness of Defendants’ Parker line of guitars. Although not generic, the Parker guitars do not squarely fit into any of the other classifications.

Adeline Lorraine Herrera v. City of Montebello

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 23, 2021

If only a 13 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 14 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 15 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 18 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 19 prior privilege review.

Lyle Spruill v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 9, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 25 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 9 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 10 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 11 appropriate markings in the margins).

Michael Sherlock v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 22 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s)(e.g., by making 23 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals Technology Corp.

272 F. Supp. 2d 1028 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2003

ICN did not clearly disclaim the dosage amount of 800 mg/day. … Moreover, the claiming of human “recognition” seems to run afoul of several well-established principles of patent law.

Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 27, 2024

Moreover, court clerks are “entitled to immunity from damages for civil rights violations for tasks that are integral to the judicial process.” Mullis v. U.S. Bankr. … Rocha which the factual predicate existed at the time of the first habeas petition qualify as second or successive).

Lowry McCray v. Westrock Services, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Jamal Mashat v. STV Incorporated

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2023

If only a portion or portions 12 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 13 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 14 the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 16 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 17 production without prior privilege review.

Samuel Nelson v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp.

278 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 26, 1967

Martin-Marietta Corporation is a Maryland corporation qualified to do business in California, having its principal office in New York, New York. … Interchemical Corporation is an Ohio corporation, qualified to do business in California, having its principal office in New York, New York.

Tremaine Carroll v. State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2022

As such, the Complaint clearly fails 15 to give defendants fair notice of the claims against them, and dismissal is therefore 16 warranted for violation of Rule 8. … State’s Eleventh Amendment immunity[.]’” 15 Dittman v.

Arturo Aceves Jimenez v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2022

as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 11 declaration, establishing … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the

Richard Tracy Henry v. Heather Shirley

District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2025

Second, petitioner cannot 27 relitigate any claim that was decided on the merits in state court unless the decision 1 “‘was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established 2 Federal law’ … established 26 federal law.

Trevor Bauer v. Lindsey C. Hill

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 2022

If only a 6 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 7 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 8 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 18 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 19 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Kellytoy Worldwide, Inc. v. Hugfun, International, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 2020

If only a portion or 25 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 26 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 27 portion(s) (e.g., … If 16 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g.,

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bradly C. Davis

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 15, 2020

If only a portion of the 21 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 23 margins). … This provision is not 18 intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 19 that provides for production without prior privilege review.

Garland Connect, LLC v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2021

If only a 3 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 || markings … If only a g 15 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing os 16 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

USA v. Montrose Chemical

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a 4 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 5 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 A Party … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).