Case law

G.D. ex rel. Dien Do v. Torrance Unified School District

857 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 8, 2012

The IEP team adopted the recommendation made in the Report that G.D. should qualify for special education because of his autistic-like behavior. … As a result, the ALJ’s Decision is clearly entitled to substantial deference as discussed in more detail below. C.

Gene Wechsler v. Hyundai Capital America

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 2023

The parties’ mere designation 20 of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the 21 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 22 sought to be filed under … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 1 provides for production without prior privilege review.

Kendall DeJuan Simon v. State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2021

Further, Rule 8 requires that a complaint clearly establish the claims and 16 parties such that a defendant would have “no difficulty in responding to the claims 17 with an answer and/or with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to … State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument.

Edwin Vasquez v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2023

clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 18 19 markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 16 17 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior

Kirk Harris v. T. Engels

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 20, 2019

immunize them from claims for prospective relief (such as forward-looking injunctive relief). … Because inmates do not have “an abstract, freestanding right to a law library or legal assistance, an inmate cannot establish relevant actual injury by establishing that his prison’s law library or legal assistance program

Jones v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare

136 F. Supp. 2d 1122 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 16, 2001

In order to qualify for LTD benefits, an employee must satisfy the eligibility requirements of the Group LTD Policy. … Based upon the individual circumstances of each claim, it determines whether a claimant qualifies for LTD benefits.

Dillard v. Pitchess

399 F. Supp. 1225 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 1975

The Sheriff operates several other establishments for the detention of prisoners, both unsenteneed and sentenced. … It is my informal understanding that the Los Angeles County Medical Association, if properly requested, would be willing to designate a team of qualified doctors who would make a survey as to the sufficiency of the medical

ESC-Toy Ltd v. Insomniac Games, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 16 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 17 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

David Lee v. Hyundai Capital America

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in 11 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 12 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 13 material … This provision is not intended to 17 modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 18 provides for production without prior privilege review.

Angel Francisco Sanchez v. City of Baldwin Park

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2023

If only a 10 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 2 11 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 || markings in … If only a 24 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 || markings in the margins

S.V. v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 10 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 22 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 24

Melissa Jefferson v. Justin Raisen

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 14, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the 5 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 6 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 7 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Joanne Toussaint v. City of El Monte

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2021

If only a 23 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 24 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 25 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 9

Nicole Juarez Zelaya v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2021

If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 7 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 8 margins). … If only a 18 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 19 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 20 margins).

Maribel Murillo v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 9, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 without prior privilege review.

M.O. Dion and Sons, Inc. v. VP Racing Fuels, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 4, 2020

If only 25 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 27 markings in the margins … If only a portion or 10 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 11 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins

Coachella Music Festival, LLC v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 9, 2022

If only a 3 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 4 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 5 margins). … If only a portion 15 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 16 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 17 (b)

Juan Molina v. Ralph Diaz

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 28, 2021

Further, evidence 24 may qualify as “some evidence” even where it does not “logically 25 preclude[] any conclusion but the one reached by the disciplinary 26 board.” … Supreme Court has held that 2 § 1983 was not intended to abrogate a State’s Eleventh Amendment 3 immunity.”).

Anthony Romero v. City of Baldwin Park

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 5 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6

Clara L. Barillas v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 16, 2019

If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 17 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 18 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 28 / / / 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion