Case law

Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A.

922 F. Supp. 2d 866 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 6, 2013

Counsel has an obligation to lay out their support clearly. Carmen v. San Francisco Sch. Dist., 237 F.3d 1026 , 1031 (9th Cir.2001). … Having concluded that Turner’s opinion is inadmissible for failure to apply reliable methods and rely upon sufficient information, the court does not address Skecher's contention that Turner is not qualified to present expert

Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Gordon R.A. Fishman Irrevocable Life Trust

638 F. Supp. 2d 1170 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 10, 2009

Fishman formed and which held the Policies when they were issued by Lincoln, clearly has an insurable interest in his life. … It is well established that an irrevocable trust, such as the one in this case, may purchase and hold life insurance policies on the life of its settlor. Moreover, Dr.

Collins v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

988 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 11, 2013

Can’t think clearly, slurred speech, can’t remember phone number.” … In her TSA report, Cook stated that Collins “would be qualified to work in a variety of occupations.” She listed five alternative occupations for which she found Collins qualified. (C.F. 636.)

Edwards v. First American Corp.

289 F.R.D. 296 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 30, 2012

Thus, Defendants argue that a detailed investigation of every class member’s loan would be needed to determine whether their loan was federally related, and even then it may be impossible to determine whether their loan qualifies … In addition, this evidence was clearly available to Defendants when they made their argument to the Ninth Circuit in 2010. See Wiener v.

Caroline Wichman v. City of San Luis Obispo

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2022

The parties’ 17 mere designation of material as “CONFIDENTIAL” does not— without the 18 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 19 sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential … Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section B(2)(b) 27 below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 28 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly

J.S.L. v. United States of America

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 2024

If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 11 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 23 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jane Doe K.G. v. Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 13, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material 12 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 14 … This provision is not intended to modify 28 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 1 production without prior privilege review.

Rigo Amavizca v. Nutra Manufacturing, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 29, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the 8 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 9 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 10 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 25 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Uche-Uwakwe v. Shinseki

972 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 18, 2013

In light of the severity of such a sanction, even if temporary, the Supreme Court found it qualified as an adverse employment action. Id. … The Ninth Circuit found the plaintiff “clearly met” the second element of his prima facie retaliation claim on this factual basis. Id. at 1375-76.

Griselda Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transportation Services Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 8, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 1 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Federal Trade Commission v. QYK Brands LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 21, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the 12 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 11 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 12 privilege review.

Albert Johnson v. Estension Logistics, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) … If only a portion or portions of the 1 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 2 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 3 || margins

American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada

District Court, C.D. California · May 12, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 28 … If 10 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 11 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 12 appropriate markings in the margins

L.A. T-Shirt and Print, Inc. v. Primitive Skateboarding, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section B(2)(b) 26 below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 27 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a portion or portions of the 20 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 21 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 22

Chris Jackson v. City of Santa Ana

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 26, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 18 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 19 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 2 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 4 appropriate markings in the margins).

G.D. ex rel. Dien Do v. Torrance Unified School District

857 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 8, 2012

The IEP team adopted the recommendation made in the Report that G.D. should qualify for special education because of his autistic-like behavior. … As a result, the ALJ’s Decision is clearly entitled to substantial deference as discussed in more detail below. C.

Gene Wechsler v. Hyundai Capital America

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 2023

The parties’ mere designation 20 of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the 21 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 22 sought to be filed under … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 1 provides for production without prior privilege review.

Kendall DeJuan Simon v. State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2021

Further, Rule 8 requires that a complaint clearly establish the claims and 16 parties such that a defendant would have “no difficulty in responding to the claims 17 with an answer and/or with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to … State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument.

Smartco International Asia Limited v. Charles Brian Gross

District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 1 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for … If only a 10 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 11 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins).

Edwin Vasquez v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2023

clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 18 19 markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 16 17 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior