Case law

Allyson Allcott v. C.B. Fleet Company, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 11, 2020

Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section 19 B(2)(b) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery 20 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a portion or 13 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 14 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 15 in the margins

Masimo Corporation v. Politan Capital Management LP

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 2024

Designations 2 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose 3 (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose 4 unnecessary expenses and … Pursuant to 23 Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that 24 the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise 25 entitled to protection

Dr. Stewart Lucas Murrey v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 4, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 10 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 11 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 23 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

3570 East Foothill Blvd., Inc. v. City of Pasadena

912 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 2, 1996

However, such a licensing scheme qualifies as a prior restraint, “because it essentially requires the permittee to obtain the government’s permission or approval before engaging in an act of speech.” … Clearly, “live entertainment” was not suddenly completely prohibited in IG zones as a result of the TRO.

Beauty Business Builder, LLC v. Skin Gym Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 25, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material 7 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 8 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 22 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 23 privilege review.

Phoenix Books, Inc. v. Mr Bongo Worldwide Ltd

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 27, 2019

The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery 22 Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent 23 evidence by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under 24 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 14 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 15 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Robert Pickens v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 2024

Id. at 322 (“Rule 25 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, 26 against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element … 24 25 6 The Court notes also that the language of the warranty clearly

Henry C. Navarro v. Connie Gipson

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 20, 2021

The only definitive source of clearly established federal law under the AEDPA is the holdings of the Supreme Court as of the time of the state court 24 decision. Williams v. … as 27 “clearly established federal law” for purposes of federal habeas review.

Lang Van, Inc. v. VNG Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2019

Except as otherwise provided in 15 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 16 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 17 the material … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party shall, to the extent reasonably possible, clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Henley v. DeVore

733 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 2010

First, such use may qualify as “transformative” under the “purpose” factor. … That case, however, only establishes that failure to take such measures is probative of recklessness but not necessarily determinative.

Lashify, Inc. v. Urban Dollz LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 6 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 7 making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 19 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 20 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

G. Ashley v. Michael Rey Moore

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 21, 2023

Except as otherwise 19 provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery 20 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated 21 before the … If only a portion or portions of the 11 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 12 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 13

Jeremy Holloway v. County of Orange

District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2021

However, Gomez later clearly corrects himself and states that he spoke with the deputies 27 during the second incident. See Pertinent Deposition Testimony of Gomez at 103–104. … 21 immunity regarding the arrest of Plaintiff, and because no material issues of fact exist.

Regina Castro v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 10 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 11 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 21 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 22 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 23 appropriate markings in the margins).

Estate of Scott Hultman v. County of Ventura

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 | protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 | (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 18 | only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 | Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 20 | appropriate markings in the margins

Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · May 14, 2021

Designations that 19 are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose 20 (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose 21 unnecessary expenses … Except as otherwise provided in this 28 Order (see, e.g., second paragraph below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 1 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly

Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · May 25, 2023

Designations that 19 are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose 20 (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose 21 unnecessary expenses … Except as otherwise provided in this 28 Order (see, e.g., second paragraph below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 1 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly

Beyond Blond Productions, LLC v. Edward Heldman III

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 11 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 12 appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 8 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 9 without prior privilege review.

Aliign Activation Wear, LLC v. lululemon athletica inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on 16 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 17 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18 … This provision is not intended to modify 18 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 19 production without prior privilege review. 20 12.

Sebastian Palma v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 2, 2024

for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 14 the material is disclosed or produced. … This provision is not intended 26 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 27