Case law

Fulwell 73 UK Ltd v. Slate Entertainment Group Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2021

If only a portion of the 22 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 24 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 7 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Darnell Henley v. Walmart Stores, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 15 || page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 16 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a 26 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 27 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 28 || appropriate markings in

Coppi v. City of Dana Point

88 F. Supp. 3d 1122 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2015

Title II TAM II-3.10000. 10 Dana Point’s Funicular operation policy clearly runs afoul of the TAM directives. … Circuits require that the burden of establishing the reasonableness of the proposed accommodation falls on the plaintiff, though only a facial or general showing of reasonableness is required. Id.

Abdirahman Aden Kariye v. Alejandro Mayorkas

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 13, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 12 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 22 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 23 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 24 in the margins).

Richard Aragon v. City of Colton

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 29, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 5

Roselia Tello v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 20 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 3 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 4 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 5 appropriate markings in the margins

Masimo Corporation v. Politan Capital Management LP

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 2024

Designations 2 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose 3 (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose 4 unnecessary expenses and … Pursuant to 23 Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that 24 the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise 25 entitled to protection

3C Engineering, Inc. v. Central Coast Community Energy

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2022

If only a portion of the material on 6 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 7 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 8 … If only a portion of 22 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 24

1LSS Inc. v. Apple Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 2025

be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 15 (a) Written Discovery and Documents and Tangible Things. … shall be interpreted to require 3 disclosure of irrelevant information or relevant information protected by the attorney- 4 client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or 5 immunity

Linda Guerrero v. FCA US LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2022

If only a 16 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 17 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 3 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5

Banc of California National Association v. Federal Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2020

If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 4 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 5 in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Michael Yaroshinsky v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 1 2 identify the protected

Jesus Torres v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2020

Plaintiff has not established that his conviction was reversed on direct 28 1 this Court a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C … The State of California has not waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity 26 for civil rights claims brought in federal court. Dittman v.

In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation

101 F.R.D. 34 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 1984

At this juncture, it is clear that some of the sealed information never would have qualified for protection under the terms of *40 P.T.O. No. 2 or Rule 26(c)(7). … The good cause requirement is met by a showing that disclosure will work a clearly defined, specific and serious injury. See, e.g., United States v.

Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.

944 F. Supp. 2d 877 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2013

The statement of ingredients on the soda can clearly states that the product’s flavor *890 is derived from extracts of natural fruits; this qualifies as “natural” under 21 C.F.R. § 101.22 (a)(3). 34 As FDA regulations explicitly … Conversely, the term "nutritious” clearly describes the healthfulness of the food. Williams is therefore inapposite. . FAC, ¶¶ 57, 126. . FAC, ¶ 135. .

Agustin Herrera v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 5, 2022

The parties’ mere designation 26 of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the 27 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 28 sought to be filed … If only a 11 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 markings in the margins

Bonin v. Vasquez

794 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 1992

Assistant United States Attorney that any offer of immunity had been made to him. … While the prosecutor did stress the “shall” aspect of the instructions, he also clearly informed the jury that there was a discretionary element to the deliberations.

Hyupsung T.R.D. CO., LTD. v. Volumecocomo Apparel, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 25, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must

McCracken v. KSF Acquisition Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 18, 2023

If only a 19 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 20 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 3 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 4 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

National Bank v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

938 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 2013

The Fraud Exclusion Modification, first, deleted the words “other than defense costs,” and, second, deleted the qualifying language “provided a final judgment or final adjudication establishes such fraudulent, dishonest, … The text clearly indicates that the language in the D & O Policy “is deleted and replaced” with the language in the Endorsement. (Policy at 30.)