Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

3,916 results

0.81s

  • Happy Ashley Ltd. v. All Access Apparel, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of 22 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kimberley V. Kelly v. Donald Trump

    District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2025

    “Where, as here, a case is at the pleading stage, the plaintiff must ‘clearly... allege facts demonstrating’ each element.” Spokeo, Inc., 578 U.S. at 338 (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 518). … Fla. 2023) (“[A]n individual citizen does not have standing to challenge whether another individual is qualified to hold public office.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Estate of Paul Rea v. County of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 2020

    If only a 15 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 16 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 17 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 28 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lucio Lemus v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 11, 2022

    If only a 21 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 22 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 23 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 6 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Murad Clark v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 2021

    If only a 11 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 || markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 28 || procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 1 || without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ranieri v. Terhune

    366 F. Supp. 2d 934 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2005

    Six years ago the California Supreme Court recognized that California courts routinely considered the federal constitutional merits of habeas petitions when determining whether petitions qualified for an exception to the … Bennett, 322 F.3d at 583 (Clark clearly “attempted to set out a definite *941 rule for prospective application” of the untimeliness rule). 2 The Ninth Circuit has recognized that before Clark , California’s timeliness bar

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Constantine Browne v. Rodney Sebastian Clark Donalds

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 7 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sheila Bates v. City of Torrance

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 18, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 9 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 11

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. v. Group XIII Properties LP

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 19, 2022

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 7 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 19 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 20 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 21 appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nicoline Ambe v. Air France, SA

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2021

    Counsel have an obligation to lay out their 10] support clearly. Carmen v. San Francisco Sch. Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2001). … external to the passenger, sufficient to qualify as an 12 “accident.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Raquel Martin v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2023

    Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section 26 B(2)(b) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery 27 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leodegario Chavez v. City of Los Angeles t al

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 1, 2019

    If only a 15 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 16 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 17 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 1

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sandra Oceguera v. Baby Trend, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 19, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 9 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 10 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion of the 20 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 21 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Randall Harris v. Broker Solutions, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 3, 2022

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 9 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 24

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • William Salpaka v. Ohio Security Insurance

    District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rydstrom v. Federal Insurance Co.

    263 F. Supp. 3d 868 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 2017

    Cal. 2009) (“To establish a breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, a plaintiff must establish the existence of a contractual obligation .,. ”). … Plaintiffs argue that Resnick and Johnson are not qualified to offer custom and practice evidence. The Court disagrees.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Armando Jauregui v. Huntington Beach California Police Department

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 9, 2019

    Except as otherwise provided in 19 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 20 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 21 the material … If 12 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 13 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Uptime Energy Inc. v. Casey's Retail Company

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 10, 2023

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 13 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 14 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jessica Woodward v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carlton Sims v. Jasmin Herrera

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 8, 2020

    In order to invoke the protection of the Due 24 Process Clause, an inmate must first establish the existence of a liberty interest and 25 then show that it was denied without due process. Sandin v. … On amendment, plaintiff must (1) clearly state whom he seeks to hold liable for which wrongs; and (2) allege facts 27 plausibly suggesting

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.