Case law

Benjamin Montemayor v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2021

If only a 6 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 7 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 8 markings in the margins). … If only a 19 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 20 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 21 markings in the margins

AirDoctor, LLC v. Lonni, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 2024

If only 15 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 16 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 17 appropriate markings in … This provision is not intended 12 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 13 provides for production without prior privilege review.

Worthington Industries, Inc. v. Inland Kenworth (US) Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 17 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 18 making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 18 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 19 privilege review.

Paula Antunez v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 2, 2022

If only a 13 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 14 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings). 15 A Party or Non-Party … If only a portion of the material on a 24 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26

Perez v. General Packer, Inc.

790 F. Supp. 1464 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 1992

The Zogbi court reasoned, first, that as a general rule, a qualifying phrase only modifies that which immediately precedes it. Id. at 1039 . … The Horn court reasoned: ... it is well-established policy that removal statutes are to be strictly construed against removal. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v.

Isaiah Clifton Gaines v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 7, 2023

If only a 1 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 2 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 3 || markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of 3 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Thaddeus Sholes v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 16, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the 22 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 23 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 9 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

United States v. Seljan

328 F. Supp. 2d 1077 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2004

The evidence adduced at two suppression hearings identified the precise transpacific route established by FedEx for these packages. … Here, defendant clearly intended to send the parcel overseas and the search at the larger Oakland hub is sufficiently connected in space and time to the international departure from San Francisco to constitute a search at

Rave Wonderland, Inc. v. City Lingerie, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and … If only 20 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 21 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 22 markings in the margins

Fahmy v. Jay-Z

788 F. Supp. 2d 1072 · District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2011

The Court concludes that the witness is qualified to offer his opinions under Rule 44.1 and 104(a), and finds his testimony helpful to consider in making the determinations herein, while not determinative. … Specifically, in the 1995 agreements, defendants point to multiple uses of the term “music” and “songs” as distinct from “recordings,” to argue that these agreements clearly transferred both, separate rights.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Daniel A. Rosen, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 2022

Except as otherwise provided in 26 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 27 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 28 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(

Beryl Weiner v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 16, 2021

must b 3 || clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies fc 10 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g 11 || by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12

Margaret Stevens v. Britax Child Safety Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2021

If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 23 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 24 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Marco Diaz v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the 22 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 23 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 24 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 11 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Seandee Gayden v. FedEx Freight, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section B(2)(b) 15 below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 16 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a 23 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 24 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins

Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. Scotsman Group, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 30, 2021

Except as otherwise provided in 21 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 22 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 23 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Santiago Holdings, LLC v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2023

If only a 19 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 20 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 21 markings in the margins … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins).

Handel v. Artukovic

601 F. Supp. 1421 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 1985

The length of the statute is clearly determined on a different basis: the amount of time within which it is reasonable to expect plaintiffs to present their claims; the concern for protecting against the loss of evidence; … Supreme Court held that “the limitation goes to the right created and accompanies the obligation everywhere ... if the limitation ... was directed to the newly created liability so specifically as to warrant saying that it qualified

Premiertek v. Wei Bing Marc

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 13, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material 16 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 17 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 28 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

Jose Riera v. Mecta Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 22 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 4 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 5 by making appropriate markings in the margins).