Case law

Alexis Agar-Valencia v. PSL Associates, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2021

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies th 1 || for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 2 || appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 11 || Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 || markings in the margins

Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.

224 F. Supp. 3d 957 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2016

The statute clearly requires that a performance, or transmission of filtered content must come from an “authorized copy” of the motion picture. … VidAngel also contends that any damage their service might cause to Plaintiffs is economic in nature and thus doesn’t qualify as irreparable harm. (Oppo. at 28-29.)

BSB Industries, LLC v. Fasthouse, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 2020

If only a portion or portions of 11 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 12 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) 13 … If only 24 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 markings in the margins

Tracy Wendell Adams v. Doerer

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2024

To obtain a conviction under §§ 1512(a)(1) and 1513(a)(1), the government had to establish that Petitioner “kill[ed] or attempt[ed] to kill another person.” … Petitioner was clearly aware of Johnson, arguing in his § 2255 motion that his conviction on count three should be vacated in light of that decision. See Adams I, Dkt. 48.

Burhaan Saleh v. Nike, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 8 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 9 appropriate markings in the margins).

Eric Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 10, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 25 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 26 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 9 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Roryce Dirden v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2020

If only a 2 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 3 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 4 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 16

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside County

181 F. Supp. 3d 725 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 2016

“Generally, district courts have been unwilling to grant a Rule 12(c) dismissal unless the movant clearly establishes that no material issue of fact remains to be resolved and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of … Applicable Federal Law Defendants contend that section 162.017 does not preempt the PIT, because it is clearly established by “applicable Federal law” under Agua Caliente and Fort Mojave that a possessory interest tax on

Worthington Industries, Inc. v. Inland Kenworth (US) Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 17 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 18 making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 18 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 19 privilege review.

Buono v. Norton

212 F. Supp. 2d 1202 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2002

On January 81, 2000, the NPS completed an evaluation of the cross for commemorative significance, and concluded that the cross did not qualify for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. … The presence of the cross clearly prevents them from freely using public land.

Thaddeus Sholes v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 16, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the 22 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 23 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 9 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Helio Health, Inc. v. Helio Health, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 20, 2022

If only a portion of the 2 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 3 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Vincent Reed v. Six Unknown Agents

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 22, 2022

Complaint 17 and is required to dismiss the case at any time it concludes the action is frivolous or 18 malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 19 monetary relief from a defendant immune … s general allegations that he has filed 21 a grievance concerning the facts alleged in the Complaint and completed the 22 grievance procedure at USP Lompoc, without providing any details regarding the 23 same, do not establish

L.D. v. EzyRoller, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 2, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 14 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making

Peter T. Erdelyi and Associates v. Optimum Seismic, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 10 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 11 appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 7 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 8 without prior privilege review.

Margaret Stevens v. Britax Child Safety Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2021

If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 23 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 24 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Seandee Gayden v. FedEx Freight, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., Section B(2)(b) 15 below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 16 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a 23 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 24 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins

Ian LaMonte Cormier v. The People Of The State Of California

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 10, 2024

SIDA of Hawaii, Inc., 810 F.2d 869, 873 n.2 (9th Cir. 1987) (“The Eleventh Amendment may be described as either creating an immunity for states or establishing a jurisdictional limitation on federal courts. … Like a jurisdictional … State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument.

Tracy Wendell Adams v. Doerer

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 4, 2024

To obtain a conviction under §§ 1512(a)(1) and 1513(a)(1), the government had to establish that Petitioner “kill[ed] or attempt[ed] to kill another person.” … Petitioner was clearly aware of Johnson, arguing in his § 2255 motion that his conviction on count three should be vacated in light of that decision. See Adams IJ, Dkt. 48.

Fahmy v. Jay-Z

788 F. Supp. 2d 1072 · District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2011

The Court concludes that the witness is qualified to offer his opinions under Rule 44.1 and 104(a), and finds his testimony helpful to consider in making the determinations herein, while not determinative. … Specifically, in the 1995 agreements, defendants point to multiple uses of the term “music” and “songs” as distinct from “recordings,” to argue that these agreements clearly transferred both, separate rights.