Case law

Gregory McDonald v. Travelers Commercial Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 18 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 19 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … Then, 27 before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 1 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 2 must clearly identify the protected portion

Clairece R. Andrus v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2022

If only a 23 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 24 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 25 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Aphrodite Tina Weinstein-Nernberg v. Banner Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 23 … If only a 4 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 5 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 6 || in the margins).

Lewis Bruister v. Debbie Asuncion

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 8, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings on the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 1 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 2 without prior privilege review.

Eric Ayala v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 15, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 28 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 … If only a 11 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 12 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriatemarkings 13 in the margins).

Jacob Schumacher v. Georgia Pacific Corrugated LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 16 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 26 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) 28

William Scott Findley, Jr. v. County of Orange

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 9, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 … If only a portion of the 2 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 3 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in

Daniel Sydnor v. Honeywell International, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 3, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 3 A Party … If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins).

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ryan C. Drexler

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 7 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 17 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 18 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 19 in the margins).

Odyssey Nail Systems, Inc. v. Bio Seaweed Gel Limited

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 13, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 28 … If only a portion of the material on a 10 || page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Jerry L. Cooch v. City of Covina

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 2019

If only a 20 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 21 |} must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 22 ||in the margins). 23 … If only a 4 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 5 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 6 || in the margins). 7

Jovanna Silva v. City of El Monte Police Department

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 2022

The parties’ mere 9 designation of material as “CONFIDENTIAL” does not— without the submission 10 of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be 11 filed under seal qualifies … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 28 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Dangerfield v. Star Editorial, Inc.

817 F. Supp. 833 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 1993

Federal courts addressing the issue of discovery of media sources in libel actions have found that the First Amendment protection includes a qualified privilege against compelled disclosure. LaRouche v. … In so doing, the Ninth Circuit acknowledged that the balancing approach established by the Supreme Court in Branzburg v.

Airplane Pockets LLC v. Daniels

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 12, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 13 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 14 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 15 markings in the margins

Design Collection, Inc. v. The TJX Companies, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 29, 2020

If only a portion or 14 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 15 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 16 in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 without prior privilege review.

Aaron Dequan Wiggins v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 25, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 2 11 || this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection |lunder this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed … If only a portion or portions of the 21 ||material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.

284 F.R.D. 504 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 2012

The American Honda court clearly disagreed with this interpretation of Hicks . … A class action is clearly a superior to individual actions as respects these California warranty classes.

Veronica Rivera v. Medtronic USA, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2022

as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 18 19 declaration, establishing … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Paola French v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 22, 2021

If only a 24 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 25 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 26 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 9 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10

Isaac Garcia v. City of Santa Ana

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 21, 2019

If only a portion or portions of the material 16 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 17 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 18 … If only a portion or portions of the material 3 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 4 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 5