Case law

Patent Category Corp. v. Target Corp.

567 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 2008

Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002). i. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Defendants argue that claims 4 and 6 are anticipated by U.S. … Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002).

Steven Scott Richardson v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2023

Brown-Hunter v. … See Brown-Hunter v.

David Mandel v. Aether Holdings, Inc., et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 3, 2026

Aether contends that although plaintiff and Lin, Aether’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of its board of directors, are both citizens of Canada,4 Lin’s citizenship should be ignored because he is a sham defendant. … Grancare, LLC v. Thrower ex rel. Mills, 889 F.3d 543, 548 (9th Cir. 2018); see Allen v.

David Castro v. TalentBurst, Inc., et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2026

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005). “[T]his includes any result of the litigation, excluding interests and costs, that ‘entails a payment’ by the defendant.” Gonzales v. … Lewis v.

Charles Michels v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 2025

Brown v. Beazley USA Servs., Inc., 2025 WL 436716, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2025). … Martin v.

CoStar Group, Inc. v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 26, 2025

Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th Cir. 2007). “In evaluating proffered expert testimony, the trial court is ‘a gatekeeper, not a fact City of Pomona v. SOM N. Am. … Primiano v. Cook, 598 F.3d 558, 564 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 597 (1993)).

Karen Barnes v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 2019

As the court in Gardiner Family, LLC v. … (citing Brown v. TranSouth Fin. Corp., 897 F. Supp. 1398, 1401 (M.D. Ala. 1995)); c.f. Gardiner Family, 147 F.

Wady v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of America

216 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 30, 2002

See Johnson v. … See Shapoff v.

Prompt Staffing, Inc. v. United States

321 F. Supp. 3d 1157 · District Court, C.D. California · May 8, 2018

Fund v. … V.

David Stramel v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2020

Defendant also failed to employ proper screening protocols for COVID-19 before boarding on the Hawaii voyage. … Before boarding on February 21, passengers were simply asked to fill out a form confirming they were not sick.

Stephanie La Grow v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 3, 2024

Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transp. Servs., 28 F.4th 989, 6 994 (9th Cir. 2022) (quoting Theis Rsch., Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 662 7 (9th Cir. 2005)). … See id.; Alvarez v. Off. Depot, Inc., 22 No. 2:17-cv-07220 PSG (AFMx), 2017 WL 5952181, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2017) 23 (60% violation rate); Brown v.

Biomagic, Inc. v. Dutch Brothers Enterprises, LLC

729 F. Supp. 2d 1140 · District Court, C.D. California · May 25, 2010

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989). Volt is where things get interesting. 3. VOLT Volt was a case similar to this one. Procedurally, at least. … Ctr. v. Health Net of Cal., Inc., 101 Cal.App.4th 711, 726 , 124 Cal.Rptr.2d 607 (2002) (disagreeing with Wolsey); Sec. Ins. Co. of Hartford v. TIG Ins.

Brian Sheedy v. Princess Criuse Lines, Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2020

Defendant also failed to employ proper screening protocols for COVID-19 before boarding on the Hawaii voyage. … Before boarding on February 21, passengers were simply asked to fill out a form confirming they were not sick.

Robert Jacobsen v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2020

Defendant also failed to employ proper screening protocols for COVID-19 before boarding on the Hawaii voyage. … Before boarding on February 21, passengers were simply asked to fill out a form confirming they were not sick.

Marshall v. Marshall (In Re Marshall)

275 B.R. 5 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2002

V. … King v. Acker, 725 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex.App.1987) (citing Tippett v. Hart, 497 S.W.2d 606 (Tex.Civ.App.1973)).

Heinz v. Havelock

757 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 19, 1991

Lew v. Moss, 797 F.2d 747, 749 (9th Cir.1986). … Because, given the requirement of complete diversity, Strawbridge v.

Rebel Van Lines v. City of Compton

663 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 25, 1987

Wood v. … Gulf Coast Investment Corp., 660 F.2d 594, 603 (5th Cir.1981) 7 ; see also Jacobs v. Board of Regents, 473 F.Supp. 663, 669-71 (S.D.Fla.1979) (collecting cases).

Craig Lamell Watley v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 8, 2020

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 7 || F.3d at 492 (citations omitted).

Migliori v. Boeing North American, Inc.

114 F. Supp. 2d 976 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2000

Browning-Ferris Industries of Cal., Inc., 7 Cal.4th 926, 931 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 , 873 P.2d 613 (1994) (quoting Sanchez v. South Hoover Hosp., 18 Cal.3d 93, 99 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 657 , 553 P.2d 1129 (1976)). … See Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal.3d 1103 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 658 , 751 P.2d 923 (1988); O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc., 92 F.Supp.2d 1026 (C.D.Cal.2000); Carey v.

William Mendenhall v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2020

Defendant also failed to employ proper screening protocols for COVID-19 before boarding on the Hawaii voyage. … Before boarding on February 21, passengers were simply asked to fill out a form confirming they were not sick.