Case law

Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2023

designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material 22 23 as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 24 declaration, establishing … #:114 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 3 A Party or Non-Party that makes original

Banco De Mexico v. Orient Fisheries, Inc.

680 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2010

However, the notarial certification clearly acknowledges that Church personally appeared and is “personally known to me.” (SAC, Ex. A at 66.) … Although both parties rely on article 1934 establishing a two-year statute of limitations for tort liability, article 1161(v) of the Mexican Civil Code also establishes a two-year statute of limitations for unlawful acts.

Victor Ruiz v. Correction Officer Stout

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 3, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 7 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 … If only a 17 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 18 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 19 || in the margins). 20

James Lewis Grey v. Zayo Group, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 20, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 21 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 4 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 5 in the margins).

Harrison v. Catholic Healthcare West Group Long Term Disability Plan

612 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2009

Plaintiffs primary contention appears to be that Defendant’s conclusion was based on clearly erroneous findings of fact. … In sum, Defendant had two highly qualified doctors review the test results, and both found critical errors with Dr. Metzger’s diagnosis that Plaintiff was infected with the three co-infections.

Financial Marketing Pros v. Retirement Thru Design

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 2021

If only a 4 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 5 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 6 markings in the margins … If only a 16 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 17 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 18 markings in the margins

Juan Pozzi v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2020

If only a portion or portions 21 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 22 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 23 appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 8 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 9 appropriate markings in the

Phyllis Stuckey v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 25 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 8 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 9 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10

Keri Neilsen v. LoanCare, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion … If 5 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 6 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion

D. R. v. City of Anaheim

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 21, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies 25 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only 8 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 9 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 10 markings in the margins).

Feliz Kotovets v. Principal Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 9 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 11 (b

Terry Lovett v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 8, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins

Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Pandora Media, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 7 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.

130 F. Supp. 3d 1331 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 2015

Authorities vary on how to establish attorney fees in the different areas where fees are recoverable. These include fees under a contract clause, see, e.g., Becker v. … “Accordingly, not every case that qualifies 'as exceptional under § 285 will also qualify for sanctions under the court’s inherent power.” MarcTec, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson, 664 F.3d 907, 921 (Fed.Cir.2012).

Jessica Gholson v. Beacon Health Options, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 29, 2022

Except as otherwise provided in 6 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 7 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 8 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Victoria Becerra v. City of Barstow

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 25, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 20 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 21 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 4 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jesus Corrales v. City of Lompoc

District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2022

If only a portion of the material 12 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 13 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 14 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 9 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 10 privilege review.

Tupou Sekona v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 26 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 27 privilege review.

Betty Jean Courtney v. State Farm General Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).

Maria Landa v. FCA US LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 28, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion … If 25 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 27 appropriate markings in the margins).