Case law

United States v. Acorn Engineering Co.

221 F.R.D. 530 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 19, 2004

Food & Drug Admin, v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). See also Richards v. … United States v.

Wady v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of America

216 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 30, 2002

See Johnson v. … See Shapoff v.

Linda Castellucci v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 2021

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005). “[W]here it is unclear or ambiguous from the face of a state-court complaint whether the requisite amount in controversy is pled . . . … Plaintiff cites Corral v.

United States Ex Rel. Giles v. Sardie

191 F. Supp. 2d 1117 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2000

Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 , 104 S.Ct. 2229 , 81 L.Ed.2d 59 (1984) (citing Conley v. … Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Jr. Univ., 161 F.3d 533 (9th Cir.1998), Stanford University’s alleged fraud was disclosed through governmental investigations and media reports. See id. at 535-36 .

Santos v. County of Los Angeles Department of Children & Family Services

299 F. Supp. 2d 1070 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2004

.”); Ram v. … VIII Having dismissed plaintiffs’ federal claims, this Court declines to retain jurisdiction over plaintiffs supplemental state claims because no federal cause of action remains. 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (c); Brown v.

Ara Eric Hunanyan v. Jeff Huberts

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2023

See Lonneker Farms, Inc. v. … Blixseth v. Brown, 470 B.R. 562, 566 (D. Mont. 2012) (citing Kashani v. Fulton, 190 B.R. 875 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1995)).

A.I.C., et al. v. Victor Corral, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 21, 2025

V. … Brown 5 V. René Daley | Attorneys for Plaintiffs A.I-C.

A. N. v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 5, 2021

N. et al v. Target Corporation et al. … See, e.g., Sotelo v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal., Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224665, at *10-11 (C.D. Cal.

De Oliveira v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

873 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 1994

On December 4, 1992, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the Id’s decision. Thereafter, petitioner filed this habeas petition. … We recognize that Kasbati v.

Alfonso Aranda v. Gavin Newsom

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 29, 2021

See Houston v. … See Brown v. Roe, 188 F.3d 1157, 1158- 9 1159 (9th Cir. 1999). Absent tolling, the one-year limitation period expired one year 10 later on May 14, 2003. Patterson v.

Edjuana Hall v. Walgreen Co.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2025

Brown v. Beazley USA Servs., Inc., 2025 WL 436716, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2025). … Freitag v. Ayers, 468 F.3d 528, 540 (9th Cir. 2006); Perata v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 2023 WL 4537695, at *11 (N.D. Cal. July 13, 2023) (citing Lyle v. Warner Bros.

Center for Biological Diversity v. Marina Point Development Associates

434 F. Supp. 2d 789 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 2006

Babbitt v. … .”); U.S. v.

Rebel Van Lines v. City of Compton

663 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 25, 1987

Wood v. … Gulf Coast Investment Corp., 660 F.2d 594, 603 (5th Cir.1981) 7 ; see also Jacobs v. Board of Regents, 473 F.Supp. 663, 669-71 (S.D.Fla.1979) (collecting cases).

Jennifer Christine Bye Garza v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2023

Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 10 1288 (9th Cir. 1996); see also Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 11 2015). … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495; 22 Bunnell v. Barnhart, 336 F.3d 1112, 1115–16 (9th Cir. 2003).

Angelique D. Spurlock v. People of the State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2020

Rule 6(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254; see 9 also Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904, 117 S. Ct. 1793, 138 L. Ed. 2d 97 (1997); Smith v. 10 Mahoney, 611 F.3d 978, 996 (9th Cir. 2010). … See Brown v. Roe, 8] 279 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2002) (district court has discretion, but is not required, to consider claims 9] presented in party’s objections to magistrate judge’s report and recommendation).

Heinz v. Havelock

757 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 19, 1991

Lew v. Moss, 797 F.2d 747, 749 (9th Cir.1986). … Because, given the requirement of complete diversity, Strawbridge v.

Pensmore Reinforcement Technologies, LLC v. Cornerstone Manufacturing and Distribution, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2022

Cal. 2008); Brown Bag Software v. … Brown Todd Gangel 13

Dunner v. University of Southern California Long Term Disability Plan

770 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2011

In Abatie v. … Welsh v. Burlington Northern, Inc., Employee Benefits Plan Plaintiff also relies on Welsh v.

Raizel Blumberger v. California Hospital Medical Center

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 2022

Mar. 1, 2018); K.C. v. Cal. Hosp. Med. Ctr., 2:18-cv- 22 06619-RGK (ASx), 2018 WL 5906057, at *3-5 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2018); see also 23 Allen v. … Martin v. Franklin Cap.

Patent Category Corp. v. Target Corp.

567 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 2008

Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002). i. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Defendants argue that claims 4 and 6 are anticipated by U.S. … Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002).